Moderator: Mods
Spud wrote:They were consolidated here, Sam: http://www.songfight.net/ and that was linked to the front page. Clearly, too obtuse for the average user.
Manhattan Glutton wrote:It only imports the latest finished fight, but yes, I never made the redirect from "current fight" automatic, which has caused some confusion.
Anyway, we're on the same team here, dickface. I think if it's going to be official, we should figure out how to make tighter integration with the archive so bots aren't necessary. What do you say?
Manhattan Glutton wrote:I went through a lot of shit and put a lot of hard work into bootstrapping the damn thing.
Lunkhead wrote:All I can do is speculate, but I would guess that practically nobody looks at songfight.net. Maybe you guys have some stats/analytics about traffic to songfight.org relative to songfight.net that could provide some hard data that would show otherwise, though, I don't know. Anyway, not to get too far off topic but if you could please put back the Jukebox link on songfight.org some time I would be very grateful, thanks. Probably linking there to the wiki would help the wiki, too, whichever wiki is "the" wiki at the moment.
Spud wrote:I just do whatever you people want
Spud wrote:Lunkhead wrote:All I can do is speculate, but I would guess that practically nobody looks at songfight.net. Maybe you guys have some stats/analytics about traffic to songfight.org relative to songfight.net that could provide some hard data that would show otherwise, though, I don't know. Anyway, not to get too far off topic but if you could please put back the Jukebox link on songfight.org some time I would be very grateful, thanks. Probably linking there to the wiki would help the wiki, too, whichever wiki is "the" wiki at the moment.
Well, there was a link to it on the front page. The consolidation wasn't my idea, I can tell you that. I think I will blame the IRC room. I just do whatever you people want. I linked to both. You guys tell me when you've figured it out.
SPUD
jb wrote:Didn't Marcus have some wiki somewhere at some point too?
Niveous wrote:Perhaps for starting a wiki, we might want to consider taking a different approach. When wikipedia started, it was a more conventional encyclopedia with a group of people assigned to creating the articles. Once a foundation was in place, they could move forward and it became the behemoth it is today. Perhaps that's what we need, a closed encyclopedia first that a few people gather information for. Once there is something there for people to work off of, then we open the flood gates.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest