You're new here. The standard response in this situation is "CDO".Loilage wrote:hehe, lol. im afraid all i can say to that Lord of Oats is WTF?!?!?! that's like well random! xxx
("Calm down Oats")
You're new here. The standard response in this situation is "CDO".Loilage wrote:hehe, lol. im afraid all i can say to that Lord of Oats is WTF?!?!?! that's like well random! xxx
No one said anything about sheet music and lyrics!! When I was talking about music and lyrics, that includes singing in pitch and properly playing your instrument... So when someone comes on here and all they can do is talk about mixing all I can think is "why are you so intense about this?... it has nothing to do with the music... being a good mixer does not mean you are a good musician." I think a goal for a musician should be that they can go and perform live... and not get boo'ed off the stage because they can't sing in pitch and they cant play their instrument. There is no doubt in my mind that mixing has its place in reviews, but it should come after lyrics and music... way after...Lunkhead wrote:This thread hijacking is a bit confusing but welcome nonetheless.
This place may be called "song fight" but you submit a recording of your song, not sheet music and lyrics. People are listening to and evaluating the whole package, including songwriting, performing, recording, mixing, and mastering. If you care about getting better reviews, then work on improving the whole package, starting with whatever is your weakest element. Or if you don't care, then don't tell people how they should write reviews.
As for SF! reviewers being more focused on mixes, I think that's baloney. It might seem that way because they actually know something about mixing, unlike average listeners, and can and do provide feedback about how mixes could be improved. To me that seems like a good thing.
Also I think SF! reviewers are actually much more lenient than people who are used to commercial music. SF! reviewers at least understand that there is going to be a lot of really amateurish music on here. Average listeners don't really hear much amateur music and they're personally not invested in SF! either. They have no reason to listen to someone singing way off pitch, or playing his/her instruments badly, or making a recording that sounds like it was made through two paper cups connected by a string. I have tried many times to get many different people to listen through a whole fight, and I always have to skip through most of the songs at their request.
Not everyone agrees with your goal for a musician. If someone disagrees, it will be reflected in their recordings, and in their reviews.tbuk00 wrote: I think a goal for a musician should be that they can go and perform live... and not get boo'ed off the stage because they can't sing in pitch and they cant play their instrument. There is no doubt in my mind that mixing has its place in reviews, but it should come after lyrics and music... way after...
HAHAHAHAHALord of Oats wrote:...I'm almost certain my comment will not be moderated. <3
A bit arbitrary, don't you think? You seem to have made up your own rules here. There are plenty of good songwriters out there who can neither sing nor play an instrument. It has been said - everyone has their own priorities. Yours are clear. They just may be different than someone else's. That's cool.tbuk00 wrote:No one said anything about sheet music and lyrics!! When I was talking about music and lyrics, that includes singing in pitch and properly playing your instrument....
That's what you think, hehe....tbuk00 wrote:lol I think we can safely end this argument with an agree to disagree... fun none the less...
Fine if that's what your goal is, but don't impose that on the rest of us. I, for one, don't have any intention of performing live (unless it's a one-off thing at a future song fight live). My interest and my focus is recorded music, and my goal is to be the best songwriter/musician/lyricist I can be, but ALSO the best engineer/mixer/masterer I can be. And just who are you to tell me that my goals are wrong? Some of the most helpful reviews I've ever gotten have been filled with mixing advice. You don't want it? Fine... disregard it, but don't impose your narrow ideals on the rest of us. Like the man said, writing reviews is enough of a pain in this ass as it is without people like you coming along and telling us all how it should be done.tbuk00 wrote:I think a goal for a musician should be that they can go and perform live... and not get boo'ed off the stage because they can't sing in pitch and they cant play their instrument.
haha I like your style... I'll admit a good portion of my argument was just for the sake of keeping the rant going. I've been killing time at work for a while now...fürrypedro wrote:That's what you think, hehe....tbuk00 wrote:lol I think we can safely end this argument with an agree to disagree... fun none the less...
but seriously, my two cents, gotta throw 'em in.
5. Once you start a rant it's so hard to stop isn't it? I'm in my element....which thread shall I troll next......
The irony there almost killed me. I mean, they had to call the paramedics and everything. It was a crisis.Lord of Oats wrote:Please stop telling people what they can and cannot say.
She's playing it to everyone? That was meant to be a special moment just between us. I feel violated.jb wrote:the only thing she's ever recorded is a dirty call she got one time on her cell phone that she won't stop making everybody listen to as if it's a joke but which she secretly masturbates to every night while watching Entertainment Tonight on mute.
I fully agree with your central hypothesis here: if this is your recording scenerio, what you are recording has to be pretty fucking incredible. *Damnit, right here would be the punchline, which would have been a link to 'Mammoth Stylings Of This Tiny Tiny Dog' but it seems to have gone missing/hidden on somesongs. Now my whole post is ruined, damn you internet, damn you straight to hell.jb wrote:if you insist upon recording into the left ear of a pair of walkman headphones you found on the sidewalk after school one day in 1986, onto what's left of the rust on a cassette tape you've recorded over about twenty dozen times (etc etc etc)
Dude, go sign yourself up for a fucking battle of the bands if that is what you are looking for. Do not come to a place that competes via recorded music if you are going to whine about people caring about how recorded music sounds.Alphie wrote:I think a goal for a musician should be that they can go and perform live... and not get boo'ed off the stage because they can't sing in pitch and they cant play their instrument. There is no doubt in my mind that mixing has its place in reviews, but it should come after lyrics and music... way after...
That's just because you're so much smarter than the rest of us.roymond wrote:Nobody understands me
I almost cried laughing... JB knows whats up and that this is seriously a laughing matter because this thread is all opinion...jb wrote:
We like shiny poppy recordings just like the receptionist at your office does and the only thing she's ever recorded is a dirty call she got one time on her cell phone that she won't stop making everybody listen to as if it's a joke but which she secretly masturbates to every night while watching Entertainment Tonight on mute.
First of all, settle down... second of all, that's not what I was "whining" about...did you read everything? Back with this all started, I was merely saying that you can't judge someone's song solely on their mixing ability and that some reviews seem to only talk about that. Its true, other people apparently agree with me or this argument wouldn't have lasted this long. If that wasn't the case, I would have just gotten a big "fuck you newb" and that would have been the end. Well not really cuz I would have retaliated... but either way, this is all just opinion. I apologize for manipulating the thread and sending it way off subject for my own amusement. This is how this site seems to be divided, between people that put more stake into the mixing and those who put more stake into the music and lyrics. Whatever you want to do is fine, I don't care anymore. Advice on mixing is totally fine, but when you make a review... just try to comment on the actual music as well. I can't imagine someone writing a song and not wanting to know if the actual music portion was good or not. And if you can't agree with that statement, I don't know what to say to you anymore...Eric Y wrote: Do not come to a place that competes via recorded music if you are going to whine about people caring about how recorded music sounds.
You tell'em Ray! Who said its not good to fade out? Thousands upon thousands of songs that have been recorded with a fade out (not to mention sold way more cd's than anyone on this site)... and you think the person who did the mixing knows less than you do?!?!?!... that is called arrogance... you know, its that thing I have when talking about my opinionCaravan Ray wrote:The only thing that pisses me off is when the mixheads start evoking the "golden rule" that fade outs are bad (yeah...I'm lookin' at you Glennnny). I'll freaking fade out if I want to freaking fade out, no matter what the freaking fade out Nazis say. Just like Neil Young said "It's better to fade away, than be a stupid, dirty old hippy"...or something like that, I don't remember exactly how it goes.
Case in point...Generic wrote:That's just because you're so much smarter than the rest of us.roymond wrote:Nobody understands me