To raise the overall quality of the reviews and set an example for others of how it should be done. That's why.Reïst wrote: Why would I review more songs to post another one of mine, when the quality of reviews is so weak?
Can we please get multiple titles again?
-
- Ice Cream Man
- Posts: 1994
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 12:26 pm
- Instruments: Vocals, Bass, Guitar, Saxophone, Flute, Keyboard, Violin, Other Stuff
- Recording Method: Logic, UAD Apollo Twin, Mac
- Submitting as: frankie big face
- Pronouns: he/him
- Location: Lancaster, PA
- Reist
- Hot for Teacher
- Posts: 3066
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 2:26 pm
- Instruments: Drums, Guitar
- Recording Method: Yamaha AW1600, Reaper
- Submitting as: Therman
- Location: Calgary
- Contact:
If the bands I reviewed on Garageband cared about anything except their own music, that would be reasonable. I find it's a lot like myspace - the only messages you get are from people trying to advertise themselves, and the only motivation to review is to gain credits for an entry. People are pleased to get a good review, but the whole process is so self-centered that I doubt my reviews could change anything.frankie big face wrote:To raise the overall quality of the reviews and set an example for others of how it should be done. That's why.
ps - I'm pretty sure my reviewer rating is at about 110% right now.
-
- Ice Cream Man
- Posts: 1994
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 12:26 pm
- Instruments: Vocals, Bass, Guitar, Saxophone, Flute, Keyboard, Violin, Other Stuff
- Recording Method: Logic, UAD Apollo Twin, Mac
- Submitting as: frankie big face
- Pronouns: he/him
- Location: Lancaster, PA
Your previous post makes it sound like you only care about your music too. It reads like you think everyone on Garageband exists only to give you feedback on your music.
Anyway, you asked a question and I gave you an answer. If you want Garageband to be a better place, then make it a better place. If you don't care that much, then don't pretend like you're any better than the other people who don't care.
Anyway, you asked a question and I gave you an answer. If you want Garageband to be a better place, then make it a better place. If you don't care that much, then don't pretend like you're any better than the other people who don't care.
- Caravan Ray
- bono
- Posts: 8665
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 1:51 pm
- Instruments: Penis
- Recording Method: Garageband
- Submitting as: Caravan Ray,G.O.R.T.E.C,Lyricburglar,The Thugs from the Scallop Industry
- Location: Toowoomba, Queensland
- Contact:
But that is the beauty of Garageband. It uses the self-centeredness of others to feed your own self-centeredness.Reïst wrote:If the bands I reviewed on Garageband cared about anything except their own music, that would be reasonable. I find it's a lot like myspace - the only messages you get are from people trying to advertise themselves, and the only motivation to review is to gain credits for an entry. People are pleased to get a good review, but the whole process is so self-centered that I doubt my reviews could change anything.frankie big face wrote:To raise the overall quality of the reviews and set an example for others of how it should be done. That's why.
I want to know what others think about my song. I couldn't give a toss about anyone else's song - but I am forced to listen to and comment on 30 of the damn things before I can get someone to listen to my song. While listening and commenting on that 30 - just occaisionally you will hear something you like. It doesn't hurt to mention that..."Hey mate - I liked your song, the guitar was cool...", or whatever. Then your turn comes and your reviews come pouring in. Most of them may be rubbish - but there is the chance you will get the odd..."hey - I liked your song"... I look at it as my personal quality assurance system. As long a faw total strangers can hear one of my songs and find some value in it - then I know I'm sort of on the right track.
Sure it's nice to have a place like SF! where nice people make an effort to comment where they don't have to. But people won't always be nice to you - it's good to get the klownhole's opinions as well.
- fluffy
- Eruption
- Posts: 11097
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:56 am
- Instruments: sometimes
- Recording Method: Logic Pro X
- Submitting as: Sockpuppet
- Pronouns: she/they
- Location: Seattle-ish
- Contact:
GB would work a lot better if the review:song ratio were lower. The last time I used it, it was 6:1, and that seemed excessive. Now it's 30? Jeeze, no wonder people just power through them.
3:1 would probably work much better, assuming the GB model were at all reasonable. (But it's not, because at the end of the day it IS a competition.)
3:1 would probably work much better, assuming the GB model were at all reasonable. (But it's not, because at the end of the day it IS a competition.)
- Caravan Ray
- bono
- Posts: 8665
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 1:51 pm
- Instruments: Penis
- Recording Method: Garageband
- Submitting as: Caravan Ray,G.O.R.T.E.C,Lyricburglar,The Thugs from the Scallop Industry
- Location: Toowoomba, Queensland
- Contact:
Haven't been there for a while - but from memory it is 30 (15 pairs of songs rated against each other). But doing lots means you get lots and lots in return.fluffy wrote:GB would work a lot better if the review:song ratio were lower. The last time I used it, it was 6:1, and that seemed excessive. Now it's 30? Jeeze, no wonder people just power through them.
3:1 would probably work much better, assuming the GB model were at all reasonable. (But it's not, because at the end of the day it IS a competition.)
Quantity always trumps quality (...hello ladies )
- Reist
- Hot for Teacher
- Posts: 3066
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 2:26 pm
- Instruments: Drums, Guitar
- Recording Method: Yamaha AW1600, Reaper
- Submitting as: Therman
- Location: Calgary
- Contact:
Well, of course I only care about my music - why else would I have joined Garageband?frankie big face wrote:Your previous post makes it sound like you only care about your music too. It reads like you think everyone on Garageband exists only to give you feedback on your music.
But seriously ... I enjoy doing the occasional review, and I've found some really good bands on there, which I suppose has made my time at Garageband worthwhile. I know they don't exist just to give me feedback, but it would be nicer if their existence provided me with more coherent feedback. I'd rather have 3 useful, coherent reviews than 10 confusing or biased reviews. When people have 15 review pairs to complete in order to bring a selfish motive to completion, there isn't going to be much quality in the reviews.
-
- Mean Street
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 3:51 pm
- Submitting as: The Weakest Suit, Test Week Hiatus, Observati, Alienboy, FAWMit, FACE, Epitaphs
- Pronouns: he/him
- Contact:
Re: Can we please get multiple titles again?
so i did a little number crunching on this myself from my first fight last april (C5SBD) to the CN9/PI fights.
with single title fights (including WCTW and CB):
average entires: 26 (n=23)
with the double title fights (these numbers are per title):
average entries: 13 (n=16)
the average number of entries has not changed, even with double fights. it's still a total of 26 per cycle.
i guess that shows that having a choice of title is not causing more people to enter the fights.
interesting.
with single title fights (including WCTW and CB):
average entires: 26 (n=23)
with the double title fights (these numbers are per title):
average entries: 13 (n=16)
the average number of entries has not changed, even with double fights. it's still a total of 26 per cycle.
i guess that shows that having a choice of title is not causing more people to enter the fights.
interesting.
- Spud
- Hot for Teacher
- Posts: 4770
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:25 am
- Instruments: Bass, Keyboards, eHorn
- Submitting as: Octothorpe
- Location: Seattle
- Contact:
Re: Can we please get multiple titles again?
Yeah, there are an equal number of people put off by it as there are people who prefer it. However, there are other benefits to smaller fights. Of course, they exactly offset the problems with same.
SPUD
SPUD
-
- Mean Street
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 3:51 pm
- Submitting as: The Weakest Suit, Test Week Hiatus, Observati, Alienboy, FAWMit, FACE, Epitaphs
- Pronouns: he/him
- Contact:
Re: Can we please get multiple titles again?
aside from my comments in another part of the forum about wishing i was "fighting" against the whole crowd, i've been enjoying the smaller fights from a reviewing perspective. i always though i preferred the bigger fights, but being able to "know" all the songs in a fight better has been pretty nice. i'm suprised that punctuation island had such a small turn out, i thought it was a title that people could have a lot of fun with. i did.