Brokeback Mountain

mkilly · Post by **mkilly** » Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:55 am

I can't believe nobody's made a topic for this yet.

I saw it last week, it was great. Solid "A." Heath Ledger did fantastically well as Ennis, Ang Lee's direction was spot-on, ultimately it was a very sad story but it had an uplifting aspect too.

Hoblit · Post by **Hoblit** » Tue Jan 31, 2006 10:40 am

I saw this last night.

It's excellent but it's VERY FREAKIN' SAD.

Also, it's edited poorly. I think it's a very high 'B'.

Not a lot I can say about it that won't be some kind of spoiler. If you like gay cowboys (eating pudding?) then go see this movie. If you like to have a good cry then go see this movie. If you are gay then go see this movie.

Post by **Lunkhead** » Tue Jan 31, 2006 6:20 pm

For some reason I just find the whole premise of this movie to be too ridiculous for me to want to suspend my disbelief. Two big hunky cowboys fall in love on a lonely night on the range, but their love is forbidden by the world they live in. Ugh. It feels to me like the same old tale of forbidden love, with the whole gay cowboy thing thrown in as a gimmick. I don't want to sound insensitive to the difficulties of homosexuals in our society. It just seems like this premise is so contrived. Something much simpler and more present could handle the same themes in a way that would seem to me to be more immediate, relevant, and effective.

fodroy · Post by **fodroy** » Tue Jan 31, 2006 6:53 pm

but something more simple and present wouldn't get nominated for an oscar.

Hoblit · Post by **Hoblit** » Tue Jan 31, 2006 7:18 pm

gimmick?

I just thought it made the premise MORE INTERESTING.

erik · Post by **erik** » Tue Jan 31, 2006 7:40 pm

Lunkhead wrote:For some reason I just find the whole premise of this movie to be too ridiculous for me to want to suspend my disbelief. Two big hunky cowboys fall in love on a lonely night on the range, but their love is forbidden by the world they live in. Ugh. It feels to me like the same old tale of forbidden love, with the whole gay cowboy thing thrown in as a gimmick. I don't want to sound insensitive to the difficulties of homosexuals in our society. It just seems like this premise is so contrived. Something much simpler and more present could handle the same themes in a way that would seem to me to be more immediate, relevant, and effective.

I think it's the whole other way around, that the whole "forbidden love in a big cruel world" thing is the gimmick to sell the gay story.

Post by **Lunkhead** » Mon Feb 13, 2006 2:04 am

OK, so now I've actually seen the movie. I think it's overrated and more of a B than an A. It seems pretty arbitrary when they first get it on which made the whole thing harder for me to buy in to. Jake Gylletc.'s character was kind of annoying. Either that or Jake G. is annoying. I haven't seen him in anything else so I can't say. Definitely good acting otherwise, though, and of course the film looks great. I think I liked The Hulk better...

fodroy · Post by **fodroy** » Mon Feb 13, 2006 10:49 am

Lunkhead wrote:Jake G. is annoying.

it's that one.

same for heath ledger. i'll probably eventually see this when it comes out on dvd and a friend rents it, but i choose not to support the career of anyone from the "brilliant" donnie darko.

prayformojo · Post by **prayformojo** » Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:04 am

I choose not to support anyone who puts "brilliant" in quotes when talking about Donnie Darko.

Adam! · Post by **Adam!** » Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:26 am

fodroy wrote:i choose not to support the career of anyone from the "brilliant" donnie darko.

Not a Battlestar Galactica fan, eh? I loved Donnie Darko when I thought I knew what it was about. Then the Director's Cut came out and I started to feel a little conflicted about it.

j$ · Post by j$ » Fri Feb 17, 2006 8:21 am

Lunkhead wrote: Ugh. It feels to me like the same old tale of forbidden love, with the whole gay cowboy thing thrown in as a gimmick. I don't want to sound insensitive to the difficulties of homosexuals in our society. It just seems like this premise is so contrived. Something much simpler and more present could handle the same themes in a way that would seem to me to be more immediate, relevant, and effective.

Hmmm I think you'll find it's based on a short story and therefore accusations of gimmickery aimed at the movie are meaningless. I don't recall any great body of homosexual activism to get this film made.

What it comes down to is - it's a period love movie, Lunkhead. Gay, straight, interracial, zoophiliac comes second to the 'romantic drama' angle.

Although I would state for the record that not every 'gay film' has to fit a particular vision of how a 'film for gays' should be presented. That's diversity.

For what it's worth, I saw it. And found it really boring. Not enough bum sex for me so I'll wait for the inevitable porn parody 'Bareback Mountain'

fodroy · Post by **fodroy** » Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:44 am

Puce wrote:
fodroy wrote:i choose not to support the career of anyone from the "brilliant" donnie darko.
Not a Battlestar Galactica fan, eh? I loved Donnie Darko when I thought I knew what it was about. Then the Director's Cut came out and I started to feel a little conflicted about it.

i stopped liking it about half way through when i realized it was basically just a dark art movie for teens.

Adam! · Post by **Adam!** » Fri Feb 17, 2006 8:18 pm

fodroy wrote:i stopped liking [Donnie Darko] about half way through when i realized it was basically just a dark art movie for teens.

[Spoilers, I guess] I stopped liking it when I realized Donnie was a superhero sent to destroy a parallel universe, which had been created by a time anomaly, in order to save the real universe.

j$ · Post by j$ » Sat Feb 18, 2006 6:12 am

I have to admit, I got that from the cinema version as well. I wouldn't have used superhero to describe it, but yeah, i thought that was pretty obvious?

Lyricburglar · Post by **Lyricburglar** » Sat Feb 18, 2006 6:47 am

This is one of the funnier news stories I've seen recently.

Bob Katter, a redneck Member of Parliment from North Queensland said there was no point showing 'Brokeback Mountain' in 'cowboy' cities like Townsville or Rockhampton - because there's no such thing as a gay cowboy. Mr Katter said:

Gays in the cattle industry would be about as common as a beautiful sheila at a (horse) breakers camp out the back of Turrawalla,"

To rebuff - former front-row forward of the North Queensland Cowboys rugby league team, Ian Roberts made his own statement:

NORTH Queensland's highest-profile gay Cowboy has laughed off the suggestion there are no homosexuals living in the state's rugged north....the gay former rugby league international-turned-actor fiercely rejected federal MP Bob Katter's claim that homosexuals are scarce in central and north Queensland's cattle industry.

full story here:

http://www.thesundaymail.news.com.au/co ... 65,00.html

anyway - just to be on the safe side - maybe I wont barrack for the Cowboys next year - and I certainly won't be "rooting' for them - as you Americans so charmingly say...

Adam! · Post by **Adam!** » Sat Feb 18, 2006 4:36 pm

Richard Kelly wrote:"The Living Receiver is chosen to guide the Artifact into position for its journey back to the Primary Universe. The Living Receiver is often blessed with Fourth Dimensional Powers. These include increased strength, telekinesis, mind control, and the ability to conjure fire and water."

j$ wrote:i thought that was pretty obvious?

No. No it wasn't.

I'm glad the original version is ambiguous enough to have a couple different interpretations, because you can give the movie the benefit of the doubt and assume that it's not embarrassingly silly high-school-level soft-sci-fi. Now I can't take it seriously.

mc3p0 · Post by **mc3p0** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 1:00 pm

Brokeback Mountain ala LEGO.

slowRodeo · Post by **slowRodeo** » Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:50 am

Brokeback To The Future

The story brokeback mountain ripped off!!