he just wasn't getting enough validation.Puce wrote: Plus if you win too many fights you run the risk of going loco.
or maybe it was the iron clef that finally did him in
he just wasn't getting enough validation.Puce wrote: Plus if you win too many fights you run the risk of going loco.
erik wrote: Validation is meaningless.
Without wishing to start some uneasy flame war, Leaf saying validation is not meaningless is not the same thing at all as saying it being the only reason for every human action. The brain can multi-task. You appear to me to be trying to shout him down by putting words in his mouth.later, erik wrote:I don't really care to prove anything beyond a shadow of a doubt to someone who disagrees with the notion that validation is not the only reason for every human action.
Yeah, like seeking it, for instance? If not from the world at large, from the woman he loved, or from his patron, or a small group?since he wasn't being validated a whole hell of a lot during his life, then there must have been some other factor driving him.
I just found the whole thing interesting, because I am the kind of person who gets stuck on a theme (philosphically... spelt better... hmmm) for a while, and before I read any of this, my latest theme HAS been the issue of validation. I agree with (I think) one of your points, in that validation is meaningless... but my twist on that (for me) is that it ends up being meaningless beyond myself. I think the desire for validation is HUGE in humans... it becomes distressing when one realizes that this is a personal desire, and rarely if ever is it some type of thing that is universally understood.erik wrote:You're right, by golly, I have no idea if he made his art because he wanted to. He could have made his art without having any real desire to do so. I have no idea whether he thought his art was good. He could have kept making all those paintings without thinking they were good.Leaf wrote:erik wrote:He made his art because he wanted to and because he thought it was good. Validation is meaningless.
How do you know this? (the first part about Van Gough, the second part is merely your opinion and one I personally don't agree with).
I am curious if the first part is your opinion, or a "fact" you have derived from some validated source.
My point was, he wasn't getting alot of validation in life. If you need a source, here is a Wiki pedia link:
http://en.[CENSORED].org/wiki/Vincent_van_Gogh#Posthumous_Fame
If you need a better source than Wiki pedia, I will admit that I don't really care to prove anything beyond a shadow of a doubt to someone who disagrees with the notion that validation is not the only reason for every human action.
I am totally going out on a limb here when I say that since he wasn't being validated a whole hell of a lot during his life, then there must have been some other factor driving him.
Leaf wrote:I think the desire for validation is HUGE in humans...
Bingo! What other life form can take such liberties with a concept such as "validation". In the animal kingdom, it's called "survival". We, on the other hand, can either give a shit or not and live to give a shit or not tomorrow. And right there lies the heart of your point, perhaps. We don't require validation for much of anything, but it does give great value to life and I think fundamentally there are threads of our animal instincts that desire validation (whether we admit it or not). For some people, negative feedback is all the validation they need for their actions.Leaf wrote:I see, from my perspective, how vaidation is meaningless, and yet, I still strive for it... I still lack understanding, completely, as to why I do that... and so it still has meaning to me
Sure, but we don't always get validation. So it's not necessary. You can get by without being validated, which is the point I was making when I responded to Rone Rivendale when he said:j$ wrote:erik wrote: Validation is meaningless.Without wishing to start some uneasy flame war, Leaf saying validation is not meaningless is not the same thing at all as saying it being the only reason for every human action. The brain can multi-task. You appear to me to be trying to shout him down by putting words in his mouth.later, erik wrote:I don't really care to prove anything beyond a shadow of a doubt to someone who disagrees with the notion that validation is not the only reason for every human action.
Yeah, like seeking it, for instance? If not from the world at large, from the woman he loved, or from his patron, or a small group?since he wasn't being validated a whole hell of a lot during his life, then there must have been some other factor driving him.
I agree totally that validation is meaningless in objective terms, but that doesn't mean that the subjective mind doesn't crave it anyway.
You're right that I was trying to shout someone down, but it wasn't Leaf, it was Rone, and it wasn't by putting words in his mouth, it was by refuting what he had said.Whatever we do in life, we do it for the validation. Otherwise, it's meaningless.
Well, you actually asked for a source, so I gave you one. If you were asking for clarity, that's cool, and I can appreciate that.Leaf wrote:I'd guess that the LACK of validation could have been a driving force for an artist like VanGough, in that he continued to seek it out simply cause he kept getting rejected. Now, I don't know this as fact no more than you did, but I was sincere... if you knew this as some reported fact on his life or if you were merely speculating to make your point, which is obivously fine...
And I don't need a "source" man, or the "by golly". You're the one who threw the point out there, I asked for clarity because I WAS INTERESTED in your point. For someone who likes to have "discussions" you SEEM to take it a little too personal too quick. Of course, I KNOW I do that!! So it's all good.
Speaking from personal experience, it's most important that you never try and figure it out or else your head will explode like that scene from the beginning of "Scanners". Women just want to hear us say it, and they really want to hear it if there's another guy there to hear us say it. Because they like the way it makes us squirm is as near an answer as to why as I've ever gotten.erik wrote:I don't know, it seems to me like how some people need to end every single phone call to their girlfriend with "I love you." Is it more important to hear those words all the time because that's the only way you *know* it, or is it more important to believe the words more when you hear them less?
jb wrote:Dan-O has a point.
JB