Page 2 of 2
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 8:14 pm
by jack
i never liked bjork. and i still don't. like her. overrated prima donna.
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 8:18 pm
by WeaselSlayer
Prima donna? Lucy, 'splain!
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:24 am
by furrypedro
jack wrote:i never liked bjork. and i still don't. like her. overrated prima donna.
I haven't always liked her, but I do now, more than you could dislike anything. You overrated prima donna.
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:27 am
by Adam!
Does Bjork lead a cult? Because Bjork fans seem ready-and-willing to die defending her from The Nonbelievers.
It is possible to like a band without alienating those who don't.
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 10:09 am
by WeaselSlayer
I don't think we're alienating the people who are referring to Bjork as "a nutbag" and an "overrated prima donna." I couldn't care less if someone liked her or not, I just don't get people having some sort of vendetta against her.
edit: And also, I don't get coming to a thread that asks for your favorite Bjork album only to say, "BJORK BLOWS." It's like going to a gun show and calling everyone a fuckin' hick.
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 12:14 pm
by furrypedro
Furrypedro wrote:This is the reason I don't go anywhere near the [insert name of band i don't like] thread.
Puce wrote:Does Bjork lead a cult?
No, but whatever it is you all just wish you were in on it. Would I die for Bjork though? now there's a question.
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 12:32 pm
by Billy's Little Trip
WeaselSlayer wrote:It's like going to a gun show and calling everyone a fuckin' hick.
Well, I still don't think "hick" should be considered a racial term. I mean, I've always used it to describe lazy people, not lazy gun freaks that talk stupid! I think if we really tried, we could reclaim "hick" and save it.
Hick 4 life!
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:46 pm
by furrypedro
Nooooo!
Hick 4 choice!!
so.....Homogenic's the one then, yeah?
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 5:44 pm
by jack
i love da hikk. but i still hate bjork.
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 6:51 pm
by j$
WeaselSlayer wrote:referring to Bjork as "a nutbag" ...
If you can't tell the difference between a character and an author, you shouldn't be allowed the privelege of posting to a thread.
the endless attention seeker wrote: And also, I don't get coming to a thread that asks for your favorite Bjork album only to say, "BJORK BLOWS." It's like going to a gun show and calling everyone a fuckin' hick.
I don't
get the opportunity of setting up a thread that doesn't accept the possibility that someone might disagree with you. Where is the 'e) none of the above', you arrogant piece of unjustified arrogance? This thread has nothing to do with Bjork and everything to do with you, and your ego. IMO, obviously.
I am sorry to mess up 'currently digging' with a 'currently not digging' but really, the world doesn't revolve around Luke and his today opinions. Borrrriiinngggg, regardless of what one thinks of his music.
Yes, I am drunk. Doesn't
neccessarily mean my opinions are wrong / worth deleting.
EDIT:Although, realistically, if someone dissed, say, The Clash or The Buzzcocks, I would be all over them, critically, and I couldn't guarantee that my critical faculties would be red-hot. But no-one has, so I am in a win-win situation, as long as I don't admit it ....... *DAMN*
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 7:29 pm
by WeaselSlayer
Sorry, I'm abandoning this thread for the one about your blog.
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 7:38 pm
by j$
Fair point, well made. Although I've never pretended otherwise, I guess, in my defence. I look forward to blocking yr ill-considered vengeance-posts on my website, I guess.
