Page 2 of 2

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:55 pm
by Bjam
I'd be old enough to vote in '08, but I'm not a citizen. I may be a green card holder by then though! Maybe I'll be able to vote by '12... or '16 :/

I would definitely vote if given the choice though. And I wouldn't care if it was a guy or a girl or a Jew or a Muslim or white or black or whatever.

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:43 pm
by Lunkhead
I would rather vote for Cythia McKinney or Barbara Lee than either Hillary or Obama.

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 6:24 pm
by fodroy
This is going to sound mean, but I probably wouldn't vote for anyone who's retarded. :(

Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:27 am
by HeuristicsInc
A friend posted this graphic to his livejournal. I figured it would fit in with this discussion:

Image

The poll still has the problem that someone might not voluntarily identify themselves as prejudiced vs. some groups, but it's interesting to see the rankings between the different groups.
-bill

Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:51 am
by roymond
Yes on both.

I doubt I'd vote for Hillary since she's an insanely divisive character (her own doing or not, just a fact) and we need people to bring us together not divide us.

I wouldn't vote for Condi Rice since, while obviously an intelligent gal, she's screwed up too many things in her security and state roles.

I think Obama is too inexperienced, but I'm still considering him.

Colin Powel sort of lost his chance and exhibited questionable "anything for our team" activities while working for W. McCain lacks this but is also a bit unfrayed at times. I sort of like that.

The only criteria that freaks me out at face value is a religious one. I will never vote for someone who professes to rely on the word of god in the decision making process. [edited to clarify that I don't hold peoples' faith against them]

Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 11:50 am
by deshead
bill wrote:it's interesting to see the rankings between the different groups
Why on Earth would an athiest want to run for president? Aren't they too busy killing babies?

Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 12:26 pm
by roymond
deshead wrote:Why on Earth would an athiest want to run for president? Aren't they too busy killing babies?
Yes, and coveting our neighbor's spouse. Very busy, indeed.

Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 12:45 pm
by fodroy
So does this mean that being an Atheist is more taboo than being Homosexual?

I'd like to know what the figures would've been for Agnostics. Or Muslims.

Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 1:24 pm
by Caravan Ray
Excuse me...but I think your Vice President has gotten loose and wandered over into our yard.

Could somebody come and get him please - we don't want to have to call the pound and have him put down

Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 1:33 pm
by HeuristicsInc
fodroy wrote: I'd like to know what the figures would've been for Agnostics. Or Muslims.
M said she thought the list of groups was based on who is considered a candidate for Pres. at this time, except for the last two (unless one of you knows a candidate that is one of them) ;)
-bill

Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 2:31 pm
by deshead
Dawkins references the poll in The God Delusion, so I don't think it's that recent. Unless it's a do-over.

What makes the U.S. such a great country is that 72 year old, twice-divorced hispanic lesbians can utter the phrase "thank God I'm not an athiest," and have it actually mean something.

Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 7:42 pm
by Hoblit
Caravan Ray wrote:Excuse me...but I think your Vice President has gotten loose and wandered over into our yard.

Could somebody come and get him please - we don't want to have to call the pound and have him put down
While I don't endorse the idea, I would turn my head away and stare at the pretty trees.

Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 8:42 pm
by mico saudad
I want to see the polling numbers for:

"<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/photo/070222/480/ ... ncompetent to be president</a>"

</sigh>