Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 2:03 pm
Getting drunk is not "excessive". I seriously doubt anyone here is an alcoholic.Lord of Oats wrote:But is no one here guilty of continued excessive use of alcohol?
Getting drunk is not "excessive". I seriously doubt anyone here is an alcoholic.Lord of Oats wrote:But is no one here guilty of continued excessive use of alcohol?
Still fucked up. Need more money to fix it. Don't get me started.Billy's Little Trip wrote:Hey Erik, what turned out to be the problem with your car?
I'd say the definition of excessive is pretty subjective. Some might say any recreational use is excessive. And I thought I made it pretty clear that I was exaggerating.erik wrote:Getting drunk is not "excessive". I seriously doubt anyone here is an alcoholic.Lord of Oats wrote:But is no one here guilty of continued excessive use of alcohol?
Well, that was speculative. A preponderance can refer to a majority, but does not necessarily specifically do so. The most frequent posters are also the most likely to be under the influence of alcohol when they post. Also consider that drunk posts and sober posts aren't the only two categories. You've also got stoned posting, tripping posting, strung-out-on-heroin posting, my-mental-acuity-went-missing-otherwise posting, etc.jb wrote:Drunk posting is fun, but there sure isn't a PREPONDERANCE of it on this board, meaning that more posts than not are by drunk people. Or mayber there is, I could be wrong. I do know that if I'm drunk and in the mood to be a silly-ass on the Internet, I'm going to do it "here".
not to get you started, but I meant to mention this before; my Mazda used to lurch forward too. (for the last six months before the engine died)erik wrote:Still fucked up. Need more money to fix it. Don't get me started.Billy's Little Trip wrote:Hey Erik, what turned out to be the problem with your car?
No, I read that, but you were like "C'mon, I was joking about y'all being alcoholics. But are you suuuuuuure you don't adhere to this definition of alcoholism?"Lord of Oats wrote:I'd say the definition of excessive is pretty subjective. Some might say any recreational use is excessive. And I thought I made it pretty clear that I was exaggerating.erik wrote:Getting drunk is not "excessive". I seriously doubt anyone here is an alcoholic.Lord of Oats wrote:But is no one here guilty of continued excessive use of alcohol?
It's also a wonderful pantie remover.fluffy wrote:I find that cheap vodka works really well at removing sticky gunk from surfaces.
Yeah, that's about right. I guess my tendency is to get defensive, even when it's with something I was kidding about. That's just part of my personality. I don't necessarily like that about myself, but it's kind of there until it goes away.erik wrote:No, I read that, but you were like "C'mon, I was joking about y'all being alcoholics. But are you suuuuuuure you don't adhere to this definition of alcoholism?"Lord of Oats wrote:I'd say the definition of excessive is pretty subjective. Some might say any recreational use is excessive. And I thought I made it pretty clear that I was exaggerating.erik wrote: Getting drunk is not "excessive". I seriously doubt anyone here is an alcoholic.