Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 12:44 am
No, because in a blog you write about things that are 1) happening right now, and 2) boring.
Illegitimi non carborundum
https://songfight.net/forums/
no. in a blog, you tend to write alot about you and your opinion. while i don't mind reading about the history of songfight, this reads like a blog.drew wrote:What I meant to say (we were en route to a movie but upon getting there, the theater was packed, the parking lot was full, and the movie had already started so we came back home) was:
The acoustic space (bear with me, this is a sort of tenuous concept, maybe) around your music is a variable. And I think that if you don't consciously work to change it, it reflects the general mood of your life.
I felt like my music was quirky and okay but rather directionless for a while and finally ended up focusing on what I wanted to do over about the past year and a half. That is a long time considering I started writing songs with a 4-track in maybe 1996 or 1997.
And funny enough, I was in college, I didn't know what I was doing, I just tried to do what I liked (in a pretty unfocused manner.) Over time I've been able to hone in on what I want to do with myself as far as a career, my personal life, and in my music. When you sharpen a knife you gotta cut off part of the metal and it sucks to lose some of an expensive knife, but it ends up sharper than before. And if you don't end up working and constantly pushing to do something different, you end up bored, and boring. (Finish the dull knife metaphor here if you want.)
So the acoustic space. A lot of my stuff before sounded like "small music" - stuff made by a dude in a bedroom with a tape recorder. Even if it had reverb or delay on it, it still sounded small and somewhat timid. A lot of you have talked about singing quietly because of your neighbors. I think that is exactly what I am talking about here - your music is reflecting the limits of your abilities (whether real or perceived) and the whole idea of that is pretty interesting to me.
I am not going to assign a good/bad scale to the authenticity or size/style of your own music's acoustic space, but I finally realized I did not want to make quirky and small (acoustically small) music any more. I experimented with real acoustic spaces in my house while recording my new album. I have worked more with amps and recording in different spaces and different ways. I have gotten some different mics and experimented with recording stuff the "wrong" way, like using a crap mic as a drum overhead or a TURBO RAT as a mic preamp.
Here is an interesting thought for all of you recordists: When you put up a mic and record something, you are getting the direct sound from the instrument and the diffuse sound from your space. No matter how close or far you are from the instrument, you record the room you are in, the acoustic signature of the room. This influences (great or small) how your music sounds. If you want your music to be a characteristic portrait of the space you inhabit, try focusing on recording the space as well as the instrument(s) you want in your song. A simple way to do this is to record acoustic guitar with one or two mics up on the guitar at the neck or body (however you usually like to do it), and then put a LDC (large-diaphragm condenser mic) in the opposite corner of the room. Or out in the hallway. Or in the bathroom. Record both tracks at once and experiment with how they sit in your track.
If you use a drum machine, output the signal to your computer speakers, or to a guitar amp, and mic the amp. Try micing it from close distances, or from across the room, or somewhere in between. Try compressing the track after it "gets some air in it" to bring out the sound of the room.
Recording can be more about who you are and what you're doing in your life than the actual song you are singing or even the lyrical content of the song, at least to yourself. You can never fully disconnect your life from the music you write or any other art you create, but I think that's good, because it tangibly tethers you to your past and reminds you to keep pushing forward.
I know a lot of this is philosophical more than concrete information but I hope it is enlightening or at least interesting as another way of looking at the recording process.
FUN FACT: A glockenspiel, much like an accordion, will almost always sound like a glockenspiel when recorded, no matter how you record it. BUT. Record them and play back at half speed (so the pitch drops an octave) and listen. The accordion turns into a terrifyingly deep, warm pipe organ. The glockenspiel is slow, pure, impossibly huge metal tubes resonating.
COROLLARY: It may be hard to play instruments in double-time so you can play them back at half-speed and end up synchronized to your song, but doing so lets you examine your sounds under a microscope. It is visualization without psychedelics and magnification of the intangible. And it is just one of a hundred interesting things you can do to tie yourself closer to, and bury yourself in the music you make.
drew
'Specially that.drew wrote: If you like tropicalia, dub, synthpop, pop, rock, hip-hop, grunge, and who knows what else, it is hard to synthesize a middle ground and I found it is more fulfilling to try to work in a style that hits closest to home.
Then a couple years later she came back to the forum and started pimping her forum and album under a different name, I suggested that she post some stuff to Songfight before she started pimping her own not-Songfight stuff, she told me to eat shit and die (in French!), and then someone else (JB?) pointed out that it was Lispector. Oops.drew wrote: Lispector: Another lady I think in new york who actually released an album at some point. Lispector means something in french but I don't speak it so who knows. Midnight rendezvous and don't dance.
... this is history?Me$$iah wrote:the title was Piece of my heat
tviyh wrote:... this is history?Me$$iah wrote:the title was Piece of my heat
I think I've only let two people down - Erik for one song, and Blue for another. I dunno, I forget
For the purpose of recounting stories of songfight history, take "songfight history" to mean "any fight that is over" and "story" to mean "anything you want to tell about the song making process for a particular song".Leaf wrote:How do you define the past?
Wow, I'd hate to see what actually trying would look like.j$ wrote:not trying to wrinkle the thread
or the drugs. sometimes it comes together as the drugs meant it to beroymond wrote:..". I am into how a lyric happened to correspond to a news event that happened the next day, which led to a sample used for the rhythm track, which wss from a Google search on related topics, and then the Britney Spears sample fit perfectly when played backwards over President Bush talking about the same item in the State of the Union. It all comes together as if god meant it to be.