I think what Caravan Ray was doing is rhetorical sarcasm to segue into his incredibly parched punchline for the question of the day. Eh, I laughed.Generic wrote:Very much not true. I never signed any paperwork indicated liability in the event of engraver error. I was dumb enough to leave my possession with a total stranger without waiving my responsibility for it. And if she had said, "Sorry, you gotta bring me another watch," I'd have complained pretty loud, but suit would be ridiculous. You can't sue over a $75 watch. I mean, you can, but you'd lose more money in the process than you'd get back in the end. And in the end, even if I was dumb enough to bring her to court, I wouldn't have a leg to stand on. Plus, I'm leaving town in five days. I wouldn't even be present to press charges.Caravan Ray wrote: That bitch of an engraver was negligent and she knew it. She wasn't doing you any favours. Of course she had to replace the goods that she damaged. If she had given you the finger and told you to take the flawed merch and like it - then you could have sued her arse, run her out the engraving business, and have her charged with assault into the bargain.
But thank you for that fine explanation, Jon Eric.
