Re: Punk Rock Drivethru (All We Could See At The Window Reviews)
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:10 pm
That's interesting, but what I'd really like to know is what did you think of my song?melvin wrote:Mark: I like your sig.
Illegitimi non carborundum
https://songfight.net/forums/
That's interesting, but what I'd really like to know is what did you think of my song?melvin wrote:Mark: I like your sig.
You know, I felt the same on the final mix. I had time to work with the song before the due date, and I made some changes that don't flow as good as the original. The song finished out over 4:30 mins, so I cut out the post chorus that lets the chorus and verse transition. I'm not loving the verse vocal changes either. I should have left them as a high/low double voice harmony. But it sounded too Alice In Chains to me. But I think it did sound better. God forbid that someone tells me I'm stealing someones sound.melvin wrote:BLT: Wow man, great recording/mix. Not totally loving the melodic content, but totally respecting the slick execution, and feeling amused by the vocal delivery. Good job.
The SF logo is a reflection on your Mom's eyeball because she's looking in at Song Fight.ujnhunter wrote:BMX: did it hurt to get that backwards song fight! logo tattooed on yer eye ball?
ThanksMC Eric B wrote:Billy's Little Trip - This song rocks. Great job.
Thanks Roger. The only flange is on the intro guitar, I think.rogerroll wrote:Billy's Little Trip: Picked bass? Tisk, tisk. The flange on the guitar throughout is a little distracting. It rocks.
You should build a time machine and go back to 1 and tell that bish not to eat the fucking apple so we can all stay naykeez.Märk wrote:Billy's Little Trip: I'm not genre-biased against this. You should build a time machine and go back to 1992. Then move to Seattle. You'll do well! This will get a voteski from me.
You're a real smartass.Billy's Little Trip wrote:You know, I felt the same on the final mix. I had time to work with the song before the due date, and I made some changes that don't flow as good as the original. The song finished out over 4:30 mins, so I cut out the post chorus that lets the chorus and verse transition. I'm not loving the verse vocal changes either. I should have left them as a high/low double voice harmony. But it sounded too Alice In Chains to me. But I think it did sound better. God forbid that someone tells me I'm stealing someones sound.melvin wrote:BLT: Wow man, great recording/mix. Not totally loving the melodic content, but totally respecting the slick execution, and feeling amused by the vocal delivery. Good job.![]()
Thanks "Michael"
Well it is my second song ever and I'm only 14 so you're probably right.melvin wrote:Easy: This has potential. Five years of solid practice could make it great.
Haha. Interesting. I started off here when I was your age (well, somesongs, anyway; this is my first SF entry). And my posts were as questionable as I noted yours to be back there. Five years of solid practice later, here I am, and I like to think I've at least improved a little bit.EasyCollision wrote:Well it is my second song ever and I'm only 14 so you're probably right.melvin wrote:Easy: This has potential. Five years of solid practice could make it great.
He's right. If this is only your second song, you're doing really well.rogerroll wrote:My point? Don't take the terse comments personally (including mine). Keep at it. It gets fun.
Feel free to listen to my first few entries as evidence of thismelvin wrote:He's right. If this is only your second song, you're doing really well.rogerroll wrote:My point? Don't take the terse comments personally (including mine). Keep at it. It gets fun.
I'd just like to emphasize this. We (i.p.) have made 5 songs on songfight, and our first, The Sugar Shaker, got some unexpectedly disgusted reviews. Not only do the people here have a ton of experience listening to songs like yours, but many of them review all 20+ each week. This means you'll get very, very honest criticisms. But that's also what I love about SongFight.Kill Me Sarah wrote:Feel free to listen to my first few entries as evidence of thismelvin wrote:He's right. If this is only your second song, you're doing really well.rogerroll wrote:My point? Don't take the terse comments personally (including mine). Keep at it. It gets fun.
In truth, the reviews will possibly never get less terse (unless you happen to make slick productions that are liked by a majority, something I doubt I'll ever manage) but you will be able to hear yourself improve and I've found no other site quite like this one when it comes to getting solid advise on everything from music technique to recording and production.
Thanks, Chuck E Cheese. Explain the twist in the middle that you had in mind. You always surprise me with your ideas.Paco Del Stinko wrote:Billy's Little Trip[/b] - Great main riffs and progressions. I like the half-steppy lines best. I think that your guitars are sounding better on this track as well, not that they necessarily sound bad prior. The vocals may be a little off, but the powerful delivery makes up for any wobbleage. I wonder what you cut out of here, as although the arrangement is fine and rocks hard, a weird turn in the middle might've been quite dramatic. Great tune and glad you're dishing out the goods.
I don't think you included enough in your lyrics for your intended meaning to be easily understood by the listener. If you really care about your audience getting the true meaning of your lyrics, you have to write the lyrics with enough clues for them to discover what you were singing about. What specific phrases do you think would lead a listener to know that this song is sung from the point of view of a celebrity whose mind has been taken over by the media?EasyCollision wrote:Why doesn't anyone get the true meaning behind the lyrics?
Thanks Paco. That reverb is actually a fully tiled basement, which was the only space we had to record the drums in. I'm hoping in the future we can record somewhere w/ better acoustics. I also had a problem with too much of the snare and toms coming thru the kick mic, even though it was IN the soundhole, so any recommendations on how I could improve the bass mic positioning is welcome. Also, all these bass comments are making me wonder if I should be focusing on getting a bass for recording rather than an amp for performing right now.Paco Del Stinko wrote: Kill Me Sarah - Don't start a coast war, please.I like the jaunty feel here and dare I say, I can hear the influence of your buddy in their melodically. (the Friz) Mix-wise, the snare has a decent combo of snap and boom, if a bit much reverb perhaps. The toms are too boomy though and the kick lacks a strong definition. I like the song though it makes me hanker for some Beatles bass.
Heh! Yeah, it is a bit, isn't it. I hadn't realised - nice call. I love REM, so that is understandable. I even sped up the final mix slightly which raised the pitch of my voice and probably Stipeified it a bit.nyjm wrote:give our regards to the earth's core [vote]
+++ good job channelling early R.E.M. +++
The drums were outside i.p.'s normal method. We ususally record everything live, but do to noise factor, the vibes, a little bit of synth, and the drums were done with Reason, through Pro Tools to compliment the guitar, vox, bass and others. Also, I ended up trying to mix the drums, which is not my forte. James is the producer extraordinaire, and he had been asleep for an hour when I woke him up to listen to it one last time...nyjm wrote: i.p. [possible vote]
/// vox are little hot ///
--- drums are cluttered and distracting; it may partially be a matter of mixing/panning ---
+++ great vox tone and melody +++
I am far less generous with the ticks:Lord of Oats wrote:Um, here's who I'm voting for.
cut/copy/edit Oatsy's list