Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 2:25 pm
Dizzy Gillespie just scored a double century against Bangladesh. How cool is that!john m wrote:There should be a sports subforum.
Illegitimi non carborundum
https://songfight.net/forums/
Dizzy Gillespie just scored a double century against Bangladesh. How cool is that!john m wrote:There should be a sports subforum.
that's two votes for the pirate thread.nyjm wrote:so, let's recap:
- random person spouting hyperbolic invective (trolling; foucauldian monstrous discourse)
- other people responding to said invective (whack-a-trolling; normalized discourse responds to monstrosity)
- bizarre sort of exchange ensues, with various positions at odds with others (multi-part discussion; evolving discourse)
- heated discussion makes a sharp left turn at albuquerque (thread-jack; monstruous discourse is subsumed into normalized discourse, creating a hybrid one)
i love the internet. it's just beautiful to watch how stuff flows.
d00d u so r totaly not megoatfucker wrote:It certainly wasn't me!Leaf wrote:Ok, who voted no??
aswipegoatfucker wrote:Are you sure about that?john m wrote:Hooray! You're back. We missed you.
I didn't miss you at all, John.
I'm Gripe.
And I just voted for myself not to fuck off.
I wasn't consulted in any banning and I definitely don't agree that this person typing herein appears ban-worthy. This whole thread is confusion.. people don't like LEF submissions so he was banned?! WTF?Oust The Mods wrote:The objective of Survivor was to destroy the community.
That's why whebn I come back it's just the same old bunch.
Some of you have been here 4 or 5 years.
I was happy to run you out of Dumbrella.
So I want to see how good you are at banning people.
LEF was not banned because of his submissions. In fact he was not banned at all. He was reprimanded by r stevens over on the dumbrella board at my request as moderator of the SongFight! forums for an offensive sexual comment he posted regarding another songfighter's underage daughter on 01/04/2004. While you may not have been personally consulted, I received many emails, PMs and phone calls to ban him, and none in his defense, except possibly from gripe here.mc3p0 wrote: I wasn't consulted in any banning and I definitely don't agree that this person typing herein appears ban-worthy. This whole thread is confusion.. people don't like LEF submissions so he was banned?! WTF?
He is absolutely being allowed to interact, and I believe that the discussion has become somewhat more rational. Please see (especially) the last few pages of http://www.songfight.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2387mc3p0 wrote: What is the real discussion please? What is this subversive manifesto?
Whatever - banning is a serious statement, but ex-LEF is correct - it's not practical to ban gripe.
Could this person be allowed to interact - I liked the clever dystopic absolute that hyper-compression of 8bit samples conveys so well.