Monkey Affairs IV MAIN

Märk · Post by **Märk** » Sat Apr 08, 2006 2:50 pm

If you are wearing headphones, TAKE THEM OFF NOW.
Do you have them off? Good.

Now, turn your volume control down.
Is it down? Good.

Now click this link: http://blogfiles.wfmu.org/KF/2006/04/luke_larsener.mov

Hoblit · Post by **Hoblit** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 5:23 pm

Sven wrote:If you are wearing headphones, TAKE THEM OFF NOW.
Do you have them off? Good.

Now, turn your volume control down.
Is it down? Good.

Now click this link: http://blogfiles.wfmu.org/KF/2006/04/luke_larsener.mov

good lord...where do I start.
0. Just horrible.
1. incredible waste of time
2. terrible art
3. stupid
4. why, just why?
5. very annoying
6. not entertaining
7. loud and obnoxious.
8. excruciating

should I go on?

Märk · Post by **Märk** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 5:29 pm

I think what you really meant to say was:

1. awesome
2. thanks sven!

Mogosagatai · Post by **Mogosagatai** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 7:16 pm

Hey, I dug it. ::slinks back to the Land of the Disenchanted::

Hoblit · Post by **Hoblit** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 7:20 pm

WHATS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE! (note that it wasn't in question form)

jute gyte · Post by **jute gyte** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 7:48 pm

I liked that a lot!

fodroy · Post by **fodroy** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 9:03 pm

i didn't get it either, hoblit. how is it art? it's a guy with microphones causing a crapton of feedback. so? what makes it different from a tame jackass clip?

jute gyte · Post by **jute gyte** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 9:19 pm

fodroy wrote:what makes it different from a tame jackass clip?

It sounds good.

mc3p0 · Post by **mc3p0** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 11:40 am

watch winder trans former

jack · Post by **jack** » Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:02 pm

the new nevada

anti-m · Post by **anti-m** » Sat Apr 22, 2006 9:11 pm

I think I may have heard this guy on songfight....

http://www3.youtube.com/watch?v=pq6vufmTJ9Q

(old news by now, I'm sure. But I can't resist)

fodroy · Post by **fodroy** » Sat Apr 29, 2006 11:55 am

a washington post article about pitchfork maybe being too powerful.

fodroy · Post by **fodroy** » Sat Apr 29, 2006 10:35 pm

this is hilarious. it may not be new to everyone, but it is to me.

"the ballad of bilbo baggins" by leonard nimoy

Bjam · Post by **Bjam** » Sat Apr 29, 2006 10:43 pm

Ever seen the music video to that, fodroy?

(I'm certain I've posted that video to Songfight before...)

fodroy · Post by **fodroy** » Sun Apr 30, 2006 12:00 am

well, dang. you've bested me again.

Kamakura · Post by **Kamakura** » Fri May 12, 2006 3:10 pm

The Dancing Bush

or, if you're British

GW's 'Friend'

Kamakura · Post by **Kamakura** » Mon May 15, 2006 3:25 am

How many forum members does it takes to change a light bulb?

1 to change the light bulb and to post that the light bulb has been changed
14 to share similar experiences of changing light bulbs and how the light bulb could have been changed differently
7 to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs
1 to move it to the Lighting section
2 to argue then move it to the Electricals section
7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about changing light bulbs
5 to flame the spell checkers
3 to correct spelling/grammar flames
6 to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light bulb" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid
2 industry professionals to inform the group that the proper term is "lamp"
15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the industry, and that "light bulb" is perfectly correct
19 to post that this forum is not about light bulbs and to please take this discussion to a lightbulb forum
11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all use light bulbs and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum
36 to debate which method of changing light bulbs is superior, where to buy the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs work best for this technique and what brands are faulty
7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different light bulbs
4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's
3 to post about links they found from the URL's that are relevant to this group which makes light bulbs relevant to this group
13 to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety including all headers and signatures, and add "Me too"
5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the light bulb controversy
4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"
13 to say "do a Google search on light bulbs before posting questions about light bulbs"
1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again.

from http://www.annoyances.org

c.layne · Post by **c.layne** » Mon May 15, 2006 5:32 am

Kamakura wrote:How many forum members does it takes to change a light bulb?

1 to change the light bulb and to post that the light bulb has been changed
14 to share similar experiences of changing light bulbs and how the light bulb could have been changed differently
7 to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs
1 to move it to the Lighting section
2 to argue then move it to the Electricals section
7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about changing light bulbs
5 to flame the spell checkers
3 to correct spelling/grammar flames
6 to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light bulb" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid
2 industry professionals to inform the group that the proper term is "lamp"
15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the industry, and that "light bulb" is perfectly correct
19 to post that this forum is not about light bulbs and to please take this discussion to a lightbulb forum
11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all use light bulbs and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum
36 to debate which method of changing light bulbs is superior, where to buy the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs work best for this technique and what brands are faulty
7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different light bulbs
4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's
3 to post about links they found from the URL's that are relevant to this group which makes light bulbs relevant to this group
13 to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety including all headers and signatures, and add "Me too"
5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the light bulb controversy
4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"
13 to say "do a Google search on light bulbs before posting questions about light bulbs"
1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again.

from http://www.annoyances.org

me too

Märk · Post by **Märk** » Mon May 15, 2006 5:40 am

c.layne wrote:
Kamakura wrote:How many forum members does it takes to change a light bulb?

1 to change the light bulb and to post that the light bulb has been changed
14 to share similar experiences of changing light bulbs and how the light bulb could have been changed differently
7 to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs
1 to move it to the Lighting section
2 to argue then move it to the Electricals section
7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about changing light bulbs
5 to flame the spell checkers
3 to correct spelling/grammar flames
6 to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light bulb" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid
2 industry professionals to inform the group that the proper term is "lamp"
15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the industry, and that "light bulb" is perfectly correct
19 to post that this forum is not about light bulbs and to please take this discussion to a lightbulb forum
11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all use light bulbs and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum
36 to debate which method of changing light bulbs is superior, where to buy the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs work best for this technique and what brands are faulty
7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different light bulbs
4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's
3 to post about links they found from the URL's that are relevant to this group which makes light bulbs relevant to this group
13 to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety including all headers and signatures, and add "Me too"
5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the light bulb controversy
4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"
13 to say "do a Google search on light bulbs before posting questions about light bulbs"
1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again.

from http://www.annoyances.org
me too

me too

Caravan Ray · Post by **Caravan Ray** » Mon May 15, 2006 6:33 am

Kamakura wrote:The Dancing Bush

or, if you're British

GW's 'Friend'

Don't leave Honest John out:

Dancing John Howard

Märk · Post by **Märk** » Mon May 15, 2006 9:01 pm

http://blog.wfmu.org/freeform/2006/05/s ... to_he.html

[edit] The Toys Went Berserk version is freaking awesome

Niveous · Post by **Niveous** » Tue May 16, 2006 2:21 pm

What the hell?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060516/ap_ ... ats_monkey