Re: Thinkin' about Some Reviews
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 7:16 am
I just think ukulele is awesome. Are you literally gay? I can be your fag hag.
Illegitimi non carborundum
https://songfight.net/forums/
Literally gay! Haha, that's funny. He's already got a hag! eh, Cashpoint?LML wrote:I just think ukulele is awesome. Are you literally gay? I can be your fag hag.
Oh yeah I'm talking glitter make up and spandex gay. Literally.Heather. Redmon. wrote:Literally gay! Haha, that's funny. He's already got a hag! eh, Cashpoint?LML wrote:I just think ukulele is awesome. Are you literally gay? I can be your fag hag.Miss you, btw!
I'd like to referee that fight.j$ wrote:I'm everygay. You should see me dance. Feel free to fight over me, potential FHs.
"Kloberdanz" is in fact German, and we pronounce it "Klo-bur-dance".John Kloberdanz – where is that last name from – German, Polish? Anyway, not important – this is nice, well recorded and produced, and Dylan-esque harmonica is enjoyable (for an instrument that was clearly invented by SATAN that is!) – but it’s a bit too sing-song, a little bit too lurchy without a truly brilliant lyric to demand my attention (that said, there are some nice lines – I found Christ too late for example) – good but undemanding.
Ick BLT, just ick!Billy's Little Trip wrote:I'd like to referee that fight.j$ wrote:I'm everygay. You should see me dance. Feel free to fight over me, potential FHs.
....in jello.
I’ll be the straight woman who has touched a gay man’s heart <3j$ wrote: Hell Yeahs… that’s why my heart is yours. Maybe I should get a tattoo?
I feel that the time placement, as well as the rhymes and repetitions, are all like shining light on the lyrics. Those words in strong places or which have been reinforced by rhymes and repeats show up more brightly. When you design, don't just splash light everywhere, put it where you want people to see things! That's how I think about that.Larry Knox wrote:Elaine, Thanks ... I never thought of crafting lyrics in this way ...Elaine DiMasi wrote:Larry Knox - Phrasing ...
I wasn't sure whether I liked it either, but it was a noticeable element that made me stop and think, which I did like, and making the listener pay attention is always praiseworthy for any music!Larry Knox wrote: Not quite sure if you liked the fact that the protagonist finally remembered her name or not. I wanted it to be a kind of surprise to the listener and an admonition that he knew it all the time but had to bury it to move on. So maybe kind of a resolution.
YepLML wrote:Them's fightin words Heather.
I've been hung up on the "evolving lyrics" thing for the past couple months, realizing that I rely on it to write (and I pick on it to review!), but a truly cool song doesn't need it - does it? So now I'm thinking, motion is more interesting than being stationary. So I like the lyric to evolve unless I like the place where the scene is for the whole three minutes, or something truly amazing is going on in the music so that I don't care about the lyrics. Maybe this means that an evolving lyric makes songs reachable by more people. The static one is YMMV for me. Your song didn't resonate with the way I scream bloody murder to the enemies in my head. Tons of other people dug your music on that one, but I didn't; I seem to like simple songs from DuToVa which are boring for others, then I'm magically less critical of it when the lyrics don't do anything special.j$ wrote:Ha! ...Unsurprisingly - i disagree and think your points are disengenuous - it's not meant to be charming, it's an honest statement of opinion not a character song, and I don't think a lyric HAS to evolve, though I'm not opposed to it.ElaineDiMasi wrote:Johnny Cashpoint - This isn't charming at all, I don't care about the character or the character he's talking to. And, you know, this is an example where I totally don't know anything new about the situation at the end of the song than I did after verse 1.
Amusing lyrics? They're not! - I was going for 100% pretentiousness this time just to see what that actually is... Thanks for liking the music. I was in the mood to work on an instrumental that week and didn't "want" to make it a SF but then I just kind of did. I think this song gets pruned back and rewritten into an instrumental with a different structure. There is a real story to it, though (which is probably why I did the SF). I met a musician who I wanted rather badly to work with, and we had an interval where I realized he missed his old band like crazy and that while he liked writing with me, I was not going to be that for him, and it was flunking while he tried to make that work. Plus, I wasn't nostalgic for any old band days of my own, because I've never been up to anything cooler to me than where I am now.j$ wrote:Miss FancyPants – I really hope the words (which I can’t hear) are amusing otherwise this sounds remarkably like pretentious hippy crap to meFar too much of the mid(i)lle ages for my tastes. Still well performed, cleverly constructed and short to the point of me almost wanting more, which is a rare thing indeed..
OK, I take it back, I'm impressed. I actually have no problem with MIDI - it's never bothered me in the way it has other reviewers, so when I use the word it's simply to imply frighteningly robot-tight music skills. Specifically I think it was the clean sounding flute made me think of Ian Anderson and his ilk.ElaineDiMasi wrote:Oh and darn it there's hardly any midi in there ...
Hey Mr. Spoon,larry knox - you're quite lucky that i downloaded the correct version of this song, the mix is definitely better.... the vocal take is MUCH better. I was gonna make the kareoke comment again, but the most recent mix sounds pretty good. it's not a bad song, and it creates a feeling and sticks to it. i would agree that you might hear this at some lounge in a casino. do you like shirts with sequins?
Ok, forget the jello.Heather. Redmon. wrote:Ick BLT, just ick!Billy's Little Trip wrote:I'd like to referee that fight.j$ wrote:I'm everygay. You should see me dance. Feel free to fight over me, potential FHs.
....in jello.
Send your calls and letters to Irwin! To Irwin!Lucky Spoon wrote: Humboat - actually well done and consistent to its style. creative idea... but just gross. shame on you.
Nothing to be sorry about. Even though you came away ultimately disappointed, I still consider this one of the most flattering reviews I've ever gotten. But I agree with what you said about taking yourself seriously. In this case, we absolutely didn't take ourselves seriously (almost impossible to, with the subject matter), but we didn't expect to be taken seriously by anybody either. This was 95% about having a laugh with my songfight IRC pals, and seeing who else has a sense of humor that twisted. Anyway, thanks for the review, it made my day!Humboat & R Mosquito - Lovely. Weirdly I think it’s like Grandaddy unplugged. Which is clearly wrong but hey – this was an certain vote until you dragged out the song past its natural end at 2.17 and started all the Chieftans piccolo shit and the ‘wacky’ speak over. The first two minutes of this song are some of the best stuff I’ve heard at SF – the second two just fuck me off. Don’t expect me to take you seriously if you don’t take yourself seriously – sorry, I just REALLY liked the first two minutes and am very disappointed.
On one hand, I can see I cut to the quick. Please don't take it personally. I usually have very limited time to write reviews, so they're done on the first listen. If I don't have anything to say, positively or negatively, I don't try and bullshit you.Larry B. wrote:I think that this is a useless review. Ok, you don't like folk, that's cool at least live up to your own standard of how you want others to critique your efforts and give some kind of feedback as to why.nyjm wrote:--- meh. folky and not much else ---