Rip It Up and Start Again
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 6:10 am
So I just finished reading this, a 500 page tome chronicling the history of post-punk from 1978 right up to Frankie Goes to Hollywood in '84, via PIL, Pere Ubu, No-Wave, Electronica and New Pop. It has some great anecdotes and a really interesting set of hypthoses on the psychology of the period.
It's pretty brilliant, with a few reservations
1. The author never misses a chance to have a sly dig at the Clash. Personal opinion and all, but it starts to smack of sourness on the 17th or 18th time.
2. Occasionally his argument threads contradict each other, usually when he's looking for a way to belittle punk in relation to post-punk. Like (correctly) pointing out that Punk was almost entirely a white european's music, and that post-punk deliberately tried to bring the rhythm back into it, but then later, in another context, quoting some of those same post-punkers saying they were deliberately avoiding the style of popular Black R&B artists ...
3. The first 300 pages are mind-blowingly good. Once he gets past 1982 however, interest tails off. I'm not so interested in heaven 17 or Culture Club so maybe that's just me. Fortunately it picks up again towards the end of the book.
4. Occasionally it falls into 'snapshots of loads of bands' - I guess even 500 odd pages isn't really enough to do them all justice.
I reccommend it to anyone interested in this era of music (that's enjoying something of a renaiisance at the moment, what with Franz Ferdinand et al) - I have a long list of albums I now want to track down just from reading about them, starting with James Chance & the Contortions ...
j$
It's pretty brilliant, with a few reservations
1. The author never misses a chance to have a sly dig at the Clash. Personal opinion and all, but it starts to smack of sourness on the 17th or 18th time.
2. Occasionally his argument threads contradict each other, usually when he's looking for a way to belittle punk in relation to post-punk. Like (correctly) pointing out that Punk was almost entirely a white european's music, and that post-punk deliberately tried to bring the rhythm back into it, but then later, in another context, quoting some of those same post-punkers saying they were deliberately avoiding the style of popular Black R&B artists ...
3. The first 300 pages are mind-blowingly good. Once he gets past 1982 however, interest tails off. I'm not so interested in heaven 17 or Culture Club so maybe that's just me. Fortunately it picks up again towards the end of the book.
4. Occasionally it falls into 'snapshots of loads of bands' - I guess even 500 odd pages isn't really enough to do them all justice.
I reccommend it to anyone interested in this era of music (that's enjoying something of a renaiisance at the moment, what with Franz Ferdinand et al) - I have a long list of albums I now want to track down just from reading about them, starting with James Chance & the Contortions ...
j$