Good to be back! My notes, with color commentary from my girlfriend transcribed and lightly edited by me to protect songfighter feelings. Listened again later on headphones to flesh out my notes.
Amby Moho: Quirky, toy guitar groove right out the gate. Feeling a strong Radiohead
You and Whose Army vibe here. You've done a good job of managing the off-beat swing/straight straddle here. When the panned drums comes in, I feel even more Beck. As far as productive notes, I don't know what I can add here. I don't know much about stoner groove music. I wish it was more groove and less stoner. I do appreciate the restraint in not going full art noise, though some people (a lot of them songfighters) like that I guess. Bottom line: While not my cup of tea, this is interesting and shows skillful intent. Songfight can always use that.
GF: What makes a song "lo-fi?" Is that lo-fi?
Berkeley Social Scene: Cross "complex time signature" off the songfight checklist. Well-executed. Nice, interesting bassline. Vocal is a well-constructed ensemble for 95% of the song - a few extra minutes of volume automation on the spots where unison diverges to harmony would have kept it tight and cohesive. Also, automate out bgv consonants that don't line up with the lead if you can't redo the takes later. Maybe bring the right acoustic down slightly. Am I hearing elastic audio artifacts? Felt like during the acoustic break I could hear some stretch. The lead guitar feels timid, apprehensive. If you're gonna have Santana tone and lines, be confident and nail every attack. Would love to hear this done with hammond, wurlitzer, rhodes, etc instead of synths. Would probably sound more like
Bob Schneider and the Scabs. Solid as always.
GF: I liked it. It was a bit nostalgic. Made me think of some band I listened to in high school
Brown Word and the Big Whine: Bass down a tad, give those drums room to remain big and groovy. Too many repeats of the intro - 30 seconds before first vocal is too long. Kind of Geddy Lee at first. Drum track could use more variation. Vocal feels too dry, and lacks oomph. This suffers from the trademark songfight "singing quietly to avoid bothering mom/roommate/neighbors, but growling a little bit to sound like singing loudly" vocal sound. This ought to be belted. The middle section is too Wreckdom for a non-Wreckdom entry. The "aah" vocal is pitchy and weird. Make it a proper middle 8 and get out. All the ingredients for a good meal are here, but the recipe needs work. Or some kind of metaphor like that.
GF: I like the unique voice and the transitions. It does need some editing (she has a film background, so she means "cutting sections out"), but for it to be truly great it needed some molly (she has never done molly)
Far North Daylight: Very Deathcab, I think maybe
Soul Meets Body is what I'm thinking of. Bring one of the vocal takes way down. Both of them in fact, but one much more than the other. The vocal levels are kind of all over the place - needs some time automating the volume if you don't want to compress (you should compress!). Get a pop filter. Synth outtro way way way too long. Give us 8 bars and get out. The top end of the audio spectrum is pretty empty. You have a couple of hat samples here in there that cut through - fill it with vocal sparkle, some subtle synth flourishes, something. There's a lot of promise here; keep at it.
GF: You can listen to it again. I'm really good at tuning things out
Glennny: Groove is very "royalty free corporate-friendly" minus ukulele and handclaps. Vocal performance needs more oomph. When you do the staccato quarters with the bass and guitar, I want the drums to acknowledge it. Chorus is weird: The lead vocal delivery goes Disney silly, and the harmonies are... "royalty free corporate-friendly." Which isn't bad per se, but it doesn't seem to fit. Do more takes or adjust your autotuner to get rid of some of those artifacts. Wayyy too much instrumental break. If you're gonna use a hammond patch for your bass, hammond players are gonna wanna hear some actual hammond playing. Bummer. When you do the "anticipated downbeat" thing in the outtro solo, the kick needs to hit along with the chords every time it happens, or it feels like a mistake. Too much tail silence; we don't need a full ten seconds of digital reverb. Potential here.
GF: Adorable. It sounds like it should be on the soundtrack of "Away We Go." It was great background noise; wouldn't want to see that performed live though
The Gross Tones: Very strong opening vocal line. Voice feels very
Steve Earl or
Robert Earl Keen. I don't mind the lazy affect of the vocal necessarily, but there are places where it's pulled off well, and places where it's uninspired and gets a bit pitchy. Robert Earl is a master at this - check him out! The guitar noodling is passable, but really doesn't fit the indy-pop vibe I feel everywhere else. Bass needs boosting and compression. You may not like to hear this, but what you've written here is a country song. This is a good thing! You evoke slice-of-life imagery in a way that reminds me of
Turnpike Troubadours,
Jason Isbell, or
Tyler Childers. Embrace it. Just trade the glockenspiel and driven guitar for a fiddle and slide. Really though, do your thing. There's potential here, and it's always good to hear something that sounds like an honest-to-god full band on songfight.
GF: I don't have any strong feelings about it. I didn't love it
Hostess Mostess: Lean into the Bowie feel more, please. I want absurd pastiche and stronger delay. Like, lean into the breaks between falsetto, head, and chest voice. Put a few more layers of bgv and bring them up. Rhythm issues in some of the instrumental tracks, vocals pitchy from time to time. This needs some kind of driving, cohesive element that brings everything together and moves us through the section changes. The stabby synth bit at 1:22 could have been it. Bass is lost; this craves a fat, melodic bassline. Overall this song has a ridiculous amount of potential, and I think you're more than capable of executing on it. As it is, you have a songwriting demo here. It's good, but I want to hear the master-level track.
GF: Maybe he can write commercials. (Me: why?) He's only good for a minute (she was reading about Sigfried and Roy during your song)
Hot Pink Halo: The vocal performance needs a great deal of work. You have moments of
Lucinda Williams or
Kirsty MacColl, and those moments are nice. However, there are a lot of missed intervals, pitch issues, and places where a late breath trips an entry. To be clear, this is a time and effort issue, not an underlying vocal talent/capacity problem. I don't mind the plodding drone of the synth wall, though I do think the bass needs to be confident, powerful, and perfectly aligned with what the vocal is doing. And yeah, ditch the trumpet thing. Let your words evoke imagery - being literal is corny. This is classic songfight. Please stick around and get better with the rest of us.
GF: That person should lay off the ganja
James Owens: Very strong
Christy Moore energy. The guitar sounds hesitant throughout, and I'm not a fan of the muddy, plugged in tone. Vocal needs work. You have the tools to do multi-track recording and editing, but this is a solo-guy-strummy song with a few extra layers of strummy bits. If you're going to put the effort into layering more onto that base, make it worth the effort! Give me parts that have purpose. Things that fill the space sonically and structurally. There's a song that appeals to me greatly under here, but I crave more in the execution.
GF: I didn't think it was bad. It inspired scenes of an old western film
Paco del Stinko: Intro too long. Not a fan of the Jonathan Davis impression. This the backing vocal that
Hostess Mostess needed. Man, this is bizarre. Lead vocal gets buried a lot. Unquantized triggers? There's a lot of push and pull in the tempo. The electric guitar is way too thin and clean for this. We need wall-of-sound distortion. As it is, the bass and bgv are doing most of the work of contextualizing the lead vocal. Big heavy guitars and a more
oi-style unison bgv would be very fun and much more cohesive. Maybe
HiM is more of a better target? I know you have the skills to turn this into something really good, you just have to decide what you want it to be.
GF: Is it over? Like anyone who has submitted, his vocals could benefit from some "passion behind his pipes"
The Pannacotta Army: Nylon strings and whistles, here we go.
I Fought the Law? Is that the song I'm thinking of? Maybe a little
Born to Run? This is gonna kill me. Anyway, cut a lot of mids on that nylon string guitar. That might solve some of the mix issues. More oomph in the vocals. The backing vocal style feels too doo-wop. The drop chorus at the end was the best chorus. Cut the bridge altogether, do the drop chorus, and repeat with a final big chorus. Also prefer the clean guitar to the fuzzface. A lot of good pieces here, need work tying it all together.
GF: Slightly PTSD'd from this one time I stumbled upon a 70's hippie jesus band
Phlebia: More Deathcab groove! This one feels like
I Will Possess Your Heart. Cool, you found the "submarine" delay preset. This is a looooong time to spend vamping on one chord. How many Jim Morrison posters do you have up in your recording space? You have the tools to make an interesting soundscape. Now give me an interesting song. Not much else I can say.
GF: It sounded a lot cleaner that the other stuff, but I just don't get it
Pigfarmer Jr: Guitar vamp feels swingy, makes the straight drums feel weird. Vocal too out front and dry, would sound good with a bit of tube burn. Might try doubling the chorus vocal with guitar to thicken it up a bit. It's a bit thin as is. I agree with the sentiments expressed, but I feel it's a bit on the nose. Could have used a few more takes on the guitar jam opening, and doubling it would have helped smooth out some of the rough edges. You have like three bridge sections in this tune. Pick one. Too many parts structurally - simplify a bit; this would punch through much better at 2:30 than 3:30.
GF: Thank you, next. I think I have a little bit of a headache
Pork Producer Jr: Fun
Earthbound-esque synth, a bit hot in the mix though. Acoustics sound great. On the group vocals, get your ending consonants together, or cut them out. Verses overall very plodding and uninspired. Opening descending chorus line good! Minor iii is an even weaker bridge move than a minor ii, and doesn't provide enough of a contrast to be interesting rather than dragging. Bass and drums up a bit, and acoustic down. Swap the synth pad for a hammond and we're off to the races. Some fun stuff here. Would like to see you razor-focused on one track versus two very different tracks. Get your vocal takes down as cleanly as your acoustic and you'll be doing really well.
GF: (She didn't like the lyrics)
shrts: Harvey Danger feel! Vocal up like 2db. Guitars sound perfect. Feel like the bass could use a touch of clarity - maybe a boost at ~400hz and another at ~2k? Congrats on being the only song this week that is too short, though
I like short songs. Don't have much else in the way of notes - you've nailed just about everything about this.
GF: If I was drunk I would dance to that, and that's exactly how long I would dance for
Sober: Following shrts, this sounds muddy! I definitely needed more vocal takes here, and should have done some harmony work beyond the 'ahhs.' Happy with the mandolin work, and I feel pretty good about my first recording project in two years. Dobro is really hard. I should bite the bullet and pay for pitch correction software. Definitely had some writer's block issues with this title, but I'm really happy I forced myself to push through it and get something done for this. The song itself isn't something I'll play forever, but I
think I've found my sound. Looking forward to participating more frequently.
GF: 10/10 would bang that guy
Sweeny Toad: Starfinger? Seriously is this
Starfinger? Very very good flow by songfight standards. Bring the vocal up a bit and compress more. Would like to hear more dynamism in the beat, particularly for the hook. Flesh it out with more melodic components than just the bass and vocal. Yeah, generally more work on the beat to make individual elements more impactful, and to support the vocal. So much potential here.
GF: I can't explain why but I hated it
Tim Hinkle: Tears for Fears or something here. Not a fan of the melodic kick beyond the instrumental hook. This doesn't know what it wants to be. Cut the lows and mids on that acoustic. Or just point the mic at the bridge instead of the soundhole. Also use a thicker pick. Some odd panning choices that stand out on headphones. This feels like 80s send-up, but it also feels like it's taking itself too seriously. Nothing here is particularly bad, but it's not very inspiring. Would like to hear you on a song where you've nailed everything.
GF: I think I yawned twice
toby roktot: I hate plugged in acoustic. I won't say any more about it. Figure out a click track solution; the tempo and rhythm is a mess - did you record this all together and in one take? Unpan the vocal and guitar. If need be, do the stereo phase trick on the guitar, and put the vocal center. The throwaway spoken vocal line should be thrown away or sung. Very much feels like the guy in his 50s who plays the Thursday happy hour at the local dive. Would love to see a more deliberate approach to this. Aim for
Chris Smithers.
GF: Did he record that in one take? (Me: I think so, yes) I like the simplicity of it. It's fine
Wreckdom: Reliably Wreckdom. Feeling very
Joy Division Disorder here. Would like a version with an upper-register punk-yell vocal. For some reason the "canary, opossum" line makes me think of
Chemical Warfare. I won't offer mix notes - y'all know what you're about, and I wouldn't want you to change <3
GF: It's called songfight, not songsuicide
At first listen,
shrts is the clear winner for me and the GF. And after listening 5-6x to every song, I'd put
Amby Moho and
Berkeley Social Scene in the next tier. No outright garbage! Overall a very good fight, though it did take a few listens for that to become apparent.