And The Horse You Rode In On (I Hate You Reviews)
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:22 am
post all negative reviews here, no niceties allowed.
Illegitimi non carborundum
https://songfight.net/forums/
I'm not sure if the fightmasters are used to some sort of unlove from people. However receiving an e-mail from your own father with a subject of "I hate you", well... that's just sadRik wrote:The fightmasters must have enjoyed opening their mailbox this morning to a bunch of messages declaring 'I Hate You' as the subject. One wonders if today's mail subjects are any different from the ones they get every other day.
Yes, it is too trebly--not too sure why/how that happened and I tried to fix it in the mastering, but what are you gonna do. I almost went with a fatter snare drum sound (this is a drum machine, dude--an almost 20-year-old drum machine!), but didn't like the "reverb" built into it. I figure one day I'll re-record with a real drummer and it'll have more of what you're looking for. If the chorus hooked you, that's all I really care about. I try to make decent recordings, but given that this was recorded in four hours the morning it was due, I'm cutting myself some slack.tonetripper wrote: Frankie Big Face - Your review....
I would love it, though I've never done one before. Name the time, the song and the tools, and I'm in.johnsonic wrote:I'd really like to collab...
I think the implication is that your song claims the sort of genuine punkiness of something like the DKs but also has something too naive and unpunky about it so that it doesn't sound too legitimate. Like the musical style is stolen and then the vocals, which are the most personal part of this piece, sound a little forced. That's how I read it. Culture is cannibalizing itself which is not good for it. I look forward to next week's!G. Rant wrote:Hey H,
Please never mention my name and Avril L's name in the same sentence ever again . . . Anyways, what the hell is your review of my song trying to get at? I'm assuming you didn't like it by your "culture is eating itself" thing you wrote. I don't know what that means, but for the next songfight I'm planning on doing something along the lines of Hanson mixed with Slayer all the while throwing in hints of Oingo Boingo and some Creedence Clearwater Revival. Waddaya think?
Gert is most pleased with your description of your visualization of Gert. We welcome such a rawk stereo-type, albeit we do feel it's pretty. And well the flash pots are what make the rawk, tight trousers are for the ladies and head bands are to keep the sweat off our brows. We're sorry you don't like the aesthetic. All hail Metal and Rawk. We also feel as though this song sounds more in the vein of S. Wonder and Jamiroquai to sound so... as you call it.... rawk.Caravan Ray wrote:Gert – Hello Songfight! Are you ready to raaaawk!?!
All a bit too big-hair and tight-trousery sounding for me. I’m picturing head-bands and flash-pots. Not pretty.
..... uh ..... money...... fame......notoriety....... to get better suits.........sex..... drugs..... tour bus........ alcohol....... better instruments..... expensive studio time with great producers....... should Gert continue? Gert thanks "h" for the ..... uh..... review.h wrote:gert it sounds like you want to be in the radio and be popular. i guess you could, but why would you want that?
The ladies are all quite fearful, I mean you all have armadillos in your trousers.gert wrote:tight trousers are for the ladies ...
My mummy always told me:gert wrote: We of Gert also wonder about your reviews and how it's possible for you to have such genre bias when you seem to skip across genre like a small stone across a still pond?
Zing.Caravan Ray wrote:My mummy always told me:gert wrote: We of Gert also wonder about your reviews and how it's possible for you to have such genre bias when you seem to skip across genre like a small stone across a still pond?
"If you can't say something nice about sombody - blame a genre bias"