Page 1 of 1

Stupid-Ass BB Bickering

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 2:23 pm
by erik
For quicker bickering, please refer to your talking points by letter:

A) You no0bs think you've got everything figured out, don't you? [/raised eyebrow of smug indignation]

B) hahhaha u oldtimerz are teh ghey

C) You people are arguing semantics.

D) Gawd, why does everyone dislike the music that I like? I guess they must be close-minded.

E) THAT song won? Had to be a friendflood.

F) Whatever it is that you hate about my music, I don't really care and I'm not going to change it.

G) Could all you lazy bastards do some reviews? Isn't that what this place is all about?

H) Gawd, you people are mean, can't you be constructive?

I) Being mean and being constructive are not mutually exclusive, you illiterate nimrod.

J) You know Erik, you're not half as funny as you think you are.

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:01 pm
by john m
But won't people get confused with the existing number system? I don't want to type "#3" and have half the readers thinking semantics and the other half thinking "Pussy."

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:03 pm
by erik
You are a wise old man.

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:22 pm
by j$
You missed my favorite - 'you two - get a room.'

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:29 pm
by erik
Nice one.

K) You two... get a room.

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 4:11 pm
by WeaselSlayer
J

Re: Stupid-Ass BB Bickering

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 4:39 pm
by Hoblit
erikb wrote:For quicker bickering, please refer to your talking points by letter:


J) You know Erik, you're not half as funny as you think you are.
NO! you're TWICE as funny!

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 7:59 pm
by Lunkhead
How about the generalized: "Just because x doesn't mean not x"?

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 8:54 pm
by Dan-O from Five-O
Lunkhead wrote:How about the generalized: "Just because x doesn't mean not x"?
Is that as in "Just because I use poor grammar doesn't mean not stupid I is"?

Doesn't, and Not should ALWAYS be used in that close of proximity of one another.

Just kidding chief.

J - but replace Erik with Dan-O

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 12:17 am
by Lunkhead
Yeah, that didn't really read the way I wanted it to. I'm thinking of comments of the nature "Just because a review is mean, doesn't mean it isn't constructive" etc.

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 12:30 am
by blue
uh, hi.

i'd like a double F with cheese and a side of I.

tks.

ps: Phunt still suck shit.

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 5:39 am
by Caravan Ray
L) What none of you realise is that I'm typing this completely naked.

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:03 am
by jimtyrrell
M) What Caravan Ray doesn't realize is that everyone assumes he's typing naked as a general rule. Make that a specific rule. This specific rule, in fact.

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 8:32 am
by Leaf
this means he's reading Jim's post naked as well. While looking at his avatar, and the twinkle in his eye as he raises a glass towards Ray's raised...uh... uh....



J.
M.
L.