Underworld: Evolution
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 11:23 pm
I dunno wtf Rotten Tomatoes expects from Underworld: Evolution. I mean, please, it's frikkin' Kate Beckinsale in a vinyl suit fighting vampires and werewolves.
That's what I wanted to see, that's what I got. And I can't hate any movie where when the bad guy gets his just desserts the whole audience goes "YEAH!"
I give it a solid <b>B</b>, <b>B</b>ecause it was lots of fun but kinda jampacked with irrelevant detail and plot stuff that I'm sure the writers thought they had to include in order to tie up loose ends from the first movie, but which just kinda cluttered things a bit. Still, I enjoyed it.
Oh, it's waaaaay more gory than I remember the first one being. A definite R rated flick and they don't pull many punches, which I always appreciate. Kate even *almost* gets naked, and they drop the f-bomb a couple times though it's not a sweary movie really.
That's what I wanted to see, that's what I got. And I can't hate any movie where when the bad guy gets his just desserts the whole audience goes "YEAH!"
I give it a solid <b>B</b>, <b>B</b>ecause it was lots of fun but kinda jampacked with irrelevant detail and plot stuff that I'm sure the writers thought they had to include in order to tie up loose ends from the first movie, but which just kinda cluttered things a bit. Still, I enjoyed it.
Oh, it's waaaaay more gory than I remember the first one being. A definite R rated flick and they don't pull many punches, which I always appreciate. Kate even *almost* gets naked, and they drop the f-bomb a couple times though it's not a sweary movie really.