Great Site
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 3:43 pm
DELETED
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 3:57 pm
FART!
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 3:57 pm
I am not answering your post in hopes that I will get a free review ($29.99 value), but to tell you that you might be able to get more of a response if you didn't use a hotmail account.
Re: NEED A RECORD DEAL???
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
Ah-haha!img2002
A New Player
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 6:35 pm
"Since working with IMG our album has not only received airplay in Canada, the USA and Europe but we've also had some positive interest from record labels in the USA and Germany." - Amanda N. Toronto, Canada
Who is Amanda M.?? I see Maroon Five and someother band I recognize on their list... uh..Third Eye Blind I think? Three Days Grace? whatever... If buddy was so hot for talent, he could just listen to the tunes and pm those he'd be interested in... 30 bucks for him to critique my music?? Maybe 8 years ago I'd give it a go.... nah. This may be well intentioned, but it just feels like dirty business to me... later, he'll ask ya to blow him under the table for promo photos... dirty.
Who is Amanda M.?? I see Maroon Five and someother band I recognize on their list... uh..Third Eye Blind I think? Three Days Grace? whatever... If buddy was so hot for talent, he could just listen to the tunes and pm those he'd be interested in... 30 bucks for him to critique my music?? Maybe 8 years ago I'd give it a go.... nah. This may be well intentioned, but it just feels like dirty business to me... later, he'll ask ya to blow him under the table for promo photos... dirty.
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 7:00 pm
i'd be happy to critique anyone's music for only $25. limited time offer.
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 7:44 pm
jack shite wrote:i'd be happy to critique anyone's music for only $25. limited time offer.
Hey, does Hoblit still owe you 20 bucks or something? ...just review his tunes dude! Win Win!!
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 7:56 pm
website's fulla broken link images too.
rock!
-bill
ps i stole that from glenn, but i've been saying "rock!" in conversation a lot lately so i thought i'd give him kudos.
rock!
-bill
ps i stole that from glenn, but i've been saying "rock!" in conversation a lot lately so i thought i'd give him kudos.
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 8:14 pm
Well it was predicatble that you would flame me for some constructive criticism of your site. A few answers to some of your responses:
First off, I'm not a "dude", nor am I a talented musician in that I don't play any instruments. But I am a talented talent agent. I primarily represent artists who have just released their first product into the marketplace. I am liscensed in the state of California and have a great track record in getting new bands into lucrative moneymaking venues. Thus that IS why I care. And that is why I feel qualified to give you my honest opinions of your music, and to tell you..if you suck..you indeed do suck. My friend was telling me that there are many people in here that could make it...and indeed I do think there are a small handful. Dylan Nau is first on my list. I've only heard one track from Carol Cleveland Sings which is in here, and I will be watching that group for future submissions.
But most of you really bug me in that you have the nerve to criticize other people's music when your own is quite frankly nothing at all to be proud of to have posted. In that catagory Octathorpe and Kapitano reign supreme....Jon Eric and Leaf 62, I have no idea what you have submitted in here but you are obviously frustrated at your lack of success. You should show some respect to the other people that post in here as they are all in the same boat as you. In fact, if you actually did become successful you would never give this place the time of day. The only reason that I am here in fact is due to my job desciption.
wow that was a fun trip down memory lane
First off, I'm not a "dude", nor am I a talented musician in that I don't play any instruments. But I am a talented talent agent. I primarily represent artists who have just released their first product into the marketplace. I am liscensed in the state of California and have a great track record in getting new bands into lucrative moneymaking venues. Thus that IS why I care. And that is why I feel qualified to give you my honest opinions of your music, and to tell you..if you suck..you indeed do suck. My friend was telling me that there are many people in here that could make it...and indeed I do think there are a small handful. Dylan Nau is first on my list. I've only heard one track from Carol Cleveland Sings which is in here, and I will be watching that group for future submissions.
But most of you really bug me in that you have the nerve to criticize other people's music when your own is quite frankly nothing at all to be proud of to have posted. In that catagory Octathorpe and Kapitano reign supreme....Jon Eric and Leaf 62, I have no idea what you have submitted in here but you are obviously frustrated at your lack of success. You should show some respect to the other people that post in here as they are all in the same boat as you. In fact, if you actually did become successful you would never give this place the time of day. The only reason that I am here in fact is due to my job desciption.
wow that was a fun trip down memory lane
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 8:14 pm
(
)<b>ADMIN SEZ: DO NOT NEVADA THIS MESSAGE BOARD. IF YOU THINK A THREAD SHOULD DIE, PM JB OR SPUD. NEVADA IS NOT NECESSARY IN THE NEW PARADIGM. USE THE IRONIC EMOTICON. IN THE MEANTIME, ENJOY THE FIRST "NEW PLAYER" THREAD OF THE NEW MESSAGE BOARDS.</b>
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 8:34 pm
I can't believe that picture has 16-million pixels and it's only 90Kb. Neat.the sober irishman wrote:Bigass Nevada
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 8:42 pm
it is? i'm just seeing a broken image.
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 9:51 pm
wait, wait, wait... 30 bucks a review? Man...
I owe songfight about 24 thousand dollars.
I owe songfight about 24 thousand dollars.
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 9:57 pm
Well, thanks for trying, Sober: It just wouldn't be a New Player thread without being Nevada'd at least once.
I just realized that the scenic Nevada emoticon must be tough to explain to the post-dumbrella crowd.
I just realized that the scenic Nevada emoticon must be tough to explain to the post-dumbrella crowd.
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 10:19 pm
Is this explained anywhere? I'm not post-dumbrella, but might as well be.Puce wrote:I just realized that the scenic Nevada emoticon must be tough to explain to the post-dumbrella crowd.
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 10:29 pm
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 11:37 pm
wow, i just read through that again and it is fun even a second time.
ooh, sf prehistory.
-bill
ooh, sf prehistory.
-bill
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:22 am
In line with the thread topic, I've just started using the Sonique2 beta release and am enjoying it. They were my favorite player during the Napster years, but some technical difficulties made me switch to less progressive programs. But they're back, baby!
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:34 am
'Post-drumbella'? *sigh*
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 10:51 am
j$ wrote:'Post-drumbella[sic]'? *sigh*
Not sure why that would make you sigh, unless it's a sigh of nostalgia.Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 11:58 am
i wasn't even here the first time 'round... and for future reference, it's equally funny the third and fourth times.HeuristicsInc wrote:wow, i just read through that again and it is fun even a second time.
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 12:02 pm
Typo. Apologies.Puce wrote:j$ wrote:'Post-drumbella[sic]'?
I'm not reknowned for nostalgic tendencies, so, no, it's not that.Puce wrote:j$ wrote:[*sigh*