I don't get to respond too much to posts, and this will probably be my only one, but just to clear up some stuff:
>Now I see that its just spam targeted at us.
>
You are a musician, and the email is about promoting musicians. No, you did not ask to get it.
>He/they probably followed the link in my signature and found that contact email.
>
What does it matter how we found you?
>you'd think they'd be telling you the names of their "artists", who are getting all
>this recognition.
No, not in an intro email. And we don't post them on the site, either, because we don't have an in-house web person to keep it updated (you'll notice everything on the site is non-changing info that does not need to be updated.)
>Even if they are legitimate would their artist still be all that popular?
>
This is correct. Since we don't work label acts, most people would not have heard of them. Even if they were well known in NY, you would not have heard of them in LA. We work independent, unknown, unsigned acts who are paying for things by themselves. This is most artists in the world, by the way. In other words, we are focusing on promoting artists that are currently getting no help from labels. That is why we have salespeople... the salesperson's only job is to spend time with the artist and educate them on how things work. All the other promoters that are mentioned in the above posts have label clients, meaning that when they do get hired by an unknown artist with no label, no shows, no sales, no press, etc., then this artist is going to fall to the bottom of that promoter's priority list. You just don't put "Unsupported Indie Artist" in a higher priority than your artist from Universal. At least, not if you want more business from Universal. Remember, everyone see the priority lists. Of course, those promoters absolutely can't tell an artist that they'll be a lesser priority, because that artist would never hire them.
>They're all about a paycheck
>
Please mention which of the above listed promoters are working for free. While you are at it, please mention which staff person(s) (not interns) at any major or mid size label that is working for free.
>not about the quality of music
>
In whose opinion? And how does this opinion affect the opinions of the 2,000 college music people we contact each week in all seven CMJ and Chartattack charts (and other niche charts)?
>and any kind of dedication to supporting it.
>
Please tell me how a minimum of eight weeks of promotion, with between two and four dedicated college-only promoters (depending on how busy we are), is not "supporting" it. Plus the option of expanding to commercial specialty, and commercial regular rotation.
>I know other music directors at other stations
>
So do we.
>and I can tell you my feelings are not unique
>
You probably do have some folks that think like you.
>and their artists do not do well in, at least, college radio.
>
Please state which artist feels that he/she did not do "well", and also what your definition of "well" is. Keep in mind that your opinion of how well an artist did is not important to that artist; that artist only cares about how well THEY think they did. Out of over 700 artists in the last ten years, an awful lot of them felt they did really good.
>I don't believe I've ever received a call in my year on the job
>
That's because college folks are most easily reached by email. If we get busy we'll add a phone person, especially if the artist is also doing commercial specialty. But email gives you much better quotes from MD's (just copy and paste) that the artist can use in their other marketing. And even though you yourself may like to get calls, many non-comm MD's and hosts do not. This is opposite of commercial, where calls dominate over emails. And keep in mind that emails still need to be operated by a human (and I'm not counting any mass emails.)
>I don't know what CD they got in the most-added, but that they didn't mention what
>it was is suspect to me. Hoblit's point about not disclosing their clients is off the
>mark.
See above.
>Literally every other promoter's website will have a list of current clients and,
>on their page to prospective clients, they'll have a list of past artists they've worked
>with (and helped to get off the ground.)
Every other promoter, at least those listed above, does non-comm only (and maybe specialty). These campaigns are purchased more by younger people who are swayed almost exclusively by "big names that they've heard of". Since we are the only one of those listed above that do not work with labels, then by definition an indie band somewhere in the world would not have heard of ours. A $2500 campaign is not enough to make an artist a "well known name that people across the country have heard of". It's just a campaign to give them a tool to use for other music business purposes.
>Bryan Farrish's website, despite the generic URL) has pages and pages of advertising
>
Please show me the paid advertising that someone hacked onto our site, and I'll remove it.
>This isn't the first time I've heard of Bryan Farrish cold calling.
>
Correct. Been contacting musicians for ten years.
>It's close to a scam
>
Please state what information you have that an artist hired us for a service (example: contacting hip hop MD's at CMJ Hip Hop reporting stations for 8 weeks, with weekly reports) for an agreed upon cost (for example $2500), and did not receive said service. You can email this information to
airplay@radio-media.com, or call us, and we will pursue.
>For Warner Brothers releases, he employs some of the same promoters
>I've just mentioned.
Makes my point above.
>but not necessarily with concrete results.
>
Who did you contact here (or which client did you contact) to obtain said results? As said above we don't post weekly changing results or lists.
Bryan
310-998-8305