The itsy bitsy Spuder went up the PRECIPITATION review spout
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:41 pm
...down came the songs and washed the Spuder out.


Illegitimi non carborundum
https://songfight.net/forums/

Neither were deliberate, but I certainly hear it now that you mention it. That's pretty cool! I was really trying to float the guitar over a punchy groove and of course, DJ pulled it all together nicely with her awesome vocal style.AJOwens wrote: Billy and the Psychotics -- Tight and engaging performance, punchy rhythms. I'm getting a taste of Cake, first detected in the low guitar lines, but also influencing the bass and drums. I didn't get that until the third listen though. I also noticed a Hendrix reference near the end (Third Stone from the Sun) -- was that deliberate? It's a cool, modern sound, and the singer gives it a lot of personality.
Like being on a big wave.....I like that metaphor. I was trying to give it a floaty feel, so that sums it up nicely. Thanks, EB.EvelBist wrote:Billy and the Psychotics
Super cool intro - distorted sustain and sloppy (obviously on purpose) sliding around. Then your vocalist has the right spitting-spite to carry the feel. I like the bass very much. I also like the flow works - like being on a wave. You could easily get over on an alternative (college) radio playlist with this. Why not send it to one or a hundred? *
Thanks, pup! I guess we just can't hide that 90s love no matter how hard we try to make our alternative blues rock style relevant for today.skypup wrote:Billy & The Psychotics
FUCK YEAH! I love this song. I feel like I'm listening to a long lost song from the 90s. Dangerous, angry guitars and awesome vocals. Nailed it.
VOTE
Interesting that you picked up on the bass harmonics. I told DJ that it's one of those cool creative things that's taken for granted as just being part of the soundscape. But you actually pointed it out, so that makes me happy. It's nice when the details are appreciated. Thanks, J!jlampson wrote:Billy and the Psychotics
I had high hopes after reading a review talking how this sound likes a long-lost 90’s song and it didn’t disappoint. Great mix and the parts-based method is something I always appreciate. Really good layering on the vocals and sweet breakdown with bass harmonics. I would pay money to go see this band play but since I can’t vote with my dollar on this one, I’ll vote the old-fashioned way and just vote.
...It's Ken on vocals this time right? (tell me if I'm wrong).
and many other super nice things.Your style is eclectically unique.....
Yes, I see that now. The tone and distortion, and the major third.Billy's Little Trip wrote:I thought the intro lead guitar I was floating over the rhythm kind of referenced the intro to that old song American Woman and thought someone would mention that. Maybe more of the tone and distortion than anything.
Thanks for listening - I think I did have a good idea at the beginning but I ran out of time, really. I just wanted to get something submitted.skypup wrote: John Lampson
This all sounds pretty solid but for some reason or other it just didn't grab me. I like how heavy it sounds at the start and the ending is pretty cool.
This jlampson guy is a joke. I mean where does he get off? Wait, that's me. Um, he's right.jlampson wrote:John Lampson
I don’t know if this is breaking tradition, but I’m not going to vote for my own song. I think the premise I started with was decent but the execution didn’t live up to it. It was an exceptionally busy week in work and life and I just wanted to submit “something”, even if it wasn’t done. I recorded the second verse when I was trying to be quiet and therefore it doesn’t have the energy the first one did. Then, it just kind of peters out and doesn’t go anywhere else, when it really needed some sort of hook or something. I feel like it sounds good, and the lyrics I had were alright, but it needs something more. If this were someone else’s song, I probably wouldn’t vote for it, either.
I felt the same way; there were just a lot of well-written pieces submitted. Hear, hear!AJOwens wrote:Lots of good ones in this fight. If I vote for all the ones I like, the way it says in the instructions, it might be more than half of them. There's nothing wrong with that, though, is there?
John Lampson -- Slap echo on the guitar is well placed. The singing connects, but it's a little pitchy here and there. The breakdown around 1:15 almost loses its way, but then recovers well. Too short -- seems like you just got started. The overall effect is of two song fragments loosely stitched together, and I never got the measure of either of them.
Yes, it does peter out, and it's not me that lost interest, really - I ran out of time!EvelBist wrote:As AJ said, there's a lot to like in the ingredients this week.
John Lampson
The vocals and tune are good, if a bit buried. The lyrical "...aster" is a clever hook too. The song just peters out, and didn't really get going though. It sounds like you were going somewhere but lost interest.
Welcome!skypup wrote:First fight!
Thanks. Can't disagree about the singing. This is my first attempt at an extended instrumental and I'm really psyched to hear you liked the payoff!skypup wrote: Foobar
I didn't really enjoy the bits with singing (sorry dude). However, the instrumental from 1:17 sounded epic. I really enjoyed that. Build up was dramatic and the pay off was worth it. Nicely done.
Thanks! I'm still working on learning how to work with electric guitar tone, so it's all a little trial and error for me now. I wonder if that accounts for some of the strangeness you're hearing.hoops wrote:Dang - all these songs are so catchy. This one is no exception and I find I have to repeat myself from previous comments about strong melodies and excellent chord sequences. I love the extended instrumental sections - great feeling and building dynamics and tension, excellent piano. I like the raw lead guitar sound though on occasions the rawness tended towards what I might have initially described as 'bum notes'. After a couple of listens, though, all the notes made sense to me. VOTE.
I think I know exactly what you're getting at. Thanks for the very thoughtful comments. It's nice to get insightful feedback on the emotion and energy as well as the technical stuff. Thanks.jlampson wrote:Nice-sounding song but the vocals sounded flat (not in a pitch way, just not very exciting). I’d like to hear more energy from the them. The instrumental portion of the song is very well done and nicely balanced. The vocals at the start of the second section start to sound more energetic and then kind of fade, almost like you were trying to be really quiet. It’s a shame I can’t connect with this song’s vocals because I really like all the other stuff you’ve done in it. I’d suggest working on getting more of “you” into your singing and I think it would make a big difference. (See my review of my own song below for something about this.)
Thanks! Agree all around, and very glad you liked the mix and instrumental parts. I had to look up MOR to find out what you meant. I agree the track sounds like it has a bit of the Mathematics of Operations Research about it. I do feel like there are lot of jokes I could make available at this disambiguation page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOR Anyway, appreciate the thoughtful comments.chocolatechips wrote: Foobar
+ Nice arrangement. I like all of the details I'm hearing.
+ I like the ambitiousness of the whole thing, instrumentally it sounds pretty close to a finished pop track.
+ I hear some pretty cool melodies ... but
- The weakest part of this track is definitely the vocals and in the world of pop music vocals are just about everything. With strong vocals this could be quite good (if a bit MOR).
Thank you very much. I too wish the vocals were more awesome but sadly that's about the best I can do!Hoops
Love the heavy scale-like riff. When it ends it makes everything sound really floaty in it's absence. Cool effect. Then the wicked solo. Very wicked. Vocals weren't bad but they didn't manage to sound as awesome as the music. Music was epic and epic vocals would have taken the song to the next level. Reminds me a little of Faith No More's final album. Very cool.
A common theme emerges in these reviews that the vocals are weaker than the music, which I've long been sadly aware of, but you're right - I could probably improve how they sit in the mix.Hoops
Is that “A Dream Theater Christmas” at the beginning? I mean that as a compliment. My first suggestion is from a mix perspective to get the vocals to blend a little more. They sit a bit too up top, in my opinion. I like the modulation and the overall mood. This is also a good example of a song shift that sounds like it belongs in the same song. Cool solo, nicely blended, with some super-crazy vibrato and guitar harmonies – oh cool! I’d be interested to hear what your influences were because you’ve got some cool, trippy stuff, that flows better than one would think it should. You’ve got my vote.
Why, thank you! There's a more interesting organ chord sequence under the solo - something like Am Em Fmaj7 E Eb D, which I was pleased to squeeze under a riff that's essentially written in A minor, but it's quite subtle.Hoops -- Another one with good atmosphere. Nice change-ups and contrasts in the rhythms, while maintaining a consistent feel throughout. The chords are fairly simple, but outstandingly decorated by the busy, thoughtfully designed riffs. I like this one a lot.
I have not had a song compared to a blue ball bitch before but I appreciate the comparison!Hoops
This dominates my head so much that I couldn't even start thinking about it technically until about a minute and a half into it. By then it was really cooking. You slipped the keys in there so smoothly and effectively that I didn't notice until they were working their magic. Then I was disappointed that they ended and wanted to chastise you but the doubled guitar work took that away and I was pacified for a while. Then the chorus comes back and soothes me again. If this tune was a woman she would be a bitch who sends you home every time with blue balls. But you always go back for more. *
All very kind stuff too - thank you!Hoops
+ One of the more ambitious tracks this week (if not the most) ... I feel like I would need to listen to it more times to really get everything you've packed into this one.
+ Musicianship is great, production is tight. No obvious flaws to point out.
+ I really like the spacey "precipitation" bits.
- Vocals aren't bad, but not as good as the rest of it.
I was hoping to leave the listener feeling slightly emotionally confused and a little cold. SUCCESS!!Hoops
I like recurring motif of that walking bassline. It goes well with the creepy vibe of the whole track. By 1:30 I'm really longing for a break. Oh, nicely timed. The slightly sour guitar part is kind of ruining this for me. Everything is just so dark and off-kilter that I'm not really enjoying myself, even though I think a lot of interesting musical things are going by. When the main part comes back in around 2:20, I feel like I didn't really get any relief. By 3:30 I'm really fatiguing. I wish these sections had more contrast with the main line. I appreciate that everything is pretty well put together, but I honestly don't know what you're trying to say with the song. What emotion do you want to come through? The whole thing leaves me a feeling a little cold.
Yeah, but I'm right. Trust me -- I WAS THERE.EvelBist wrote:I've been spaced out with life in general lately ... but many thanks for the reviews of my tune:
New Image
Now this is cool. I'd go to your show and have a lot of fun. Fun lo-fi alt rock. I like it. - skypup
lo-fi alt rock - YIKES!!!
New Image
Ratty guitar, alright! And a straight-ahead punk vibe. - jlampson
punk vibe - DOUBLE YIKES!!!
New Image --
... the arrangement and all the parts add up to a great sixties radio sound. - AJOwens
sixties radio sound - TRIPLE AND QUADRUPLE YIKES!!!
New Image
Fun 80's-style track. - foobar93
80's - MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF YIKES!!!
i guess it depends on where one wakes up in the space-time continuum as to what we hear. i prefer sleeping
It's a nice one too. Good energy in the rhythm, very clean and well-balanced production, appealing vocals. Could build a bit more toward the end. The words were clearly sung and recorded, but did not jump out at me and I have no idea what they were saying (which is normal for me). Coulda been a contender!Albatross wrote:I am unearthing this thread because I have only just now completed an entry for this fight. . .