Yup, he knows for sure.Reïst wrote:It's 89.98 with the shock mount, and looks cool.
Another thread about vocals
- roymond
- Ibárruri
- Posts: 5235
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 3:42 pm
- Instruments: Guitars, Bass, Vocals, Logic
- Recording Method: Logic X, MacBookPro, Focusrite Scarlett 2i2
- Submitting as: roymond, Dangerous Croutons, Intentionally Left Bank, Moody Vermin
- Pronouns: he/him
- Location: brooklyn
- Contact:
Re: Another thread about vocals
roymond.com | songfights | covers
"Any more chromaticism and you'll have to change your last name to Wagner!" - Frankie Big Face
"Any more chromaticism and you'll have to change your last name to Wagner!" - Frankie Big Face
- Reist
- Roosevelt
- Posts: 3066
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 2:26 pm
- Instruments: Drums, Guitar
- Recording Method: Yamaha AW1600, Reaper
- Submitting as: Therman
- Location: Calgary
- Contact:
Re: Another thread about vocals
Just so the question doesn't get lost in the funny thread ... I'm going to repost it on this page.
Oops. For some reason I had them fused as one in my brain. I've checked around a bit online, and they both seem to be quite favorably reviewed. Would you recommend the Studio Projects B1 over the Behringer B1?Steve Durand wrote:Don't confuse the Studio Projects B1 with the Behringer B1.Reïst wrote: 2. B1s and all cheap Behringers suck.
That's exactly what the keyboard guy at Axe looks like. The guy giving me advice was bald though. Something's up.Caravan Ray wrote:No. Simply having a black T-shirt, body odour, long, greasy hair and 6 inches of visible arse-crack* does necessarily qualify someone to distribute technical advice.jb wrote: I don't trust music store dudes at all one little bit.
- Adam!
- Niemöller
- Posts: 1433
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:10 am
- Instruments: Drum 'n' Bass (but not THAT Drum 'n' Bass)
- Recording Method: Reaper + Stock Plugins
- Submitting as: Max Bombast
- Pronouns: he/him
- Location: Victoria, BC, AwesomeLand
- Contact:
Re: Another thread about vocals
Oops. For some reason I had them fused as one in my brain.
-
- Orwell
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 1:26 pm
- Instruments: trumpet, trombone, sax, clarinet, flute, keyboards, banjo, guitar, bass, ukulele
- Recording Method: SONAR 6, Dell Inspiron E1705, Edirol UA-25, Studio Projects B-1 Mic
- Submitting as: Steve Durand, Elastic Waste Band
- Location: Anaheim, CA
Re: Another thread about vocals
I've never used the Behringer so I really couldn't say. But Ross, Ken, and I all have direct experience with the Studio Projects mic and we all like it. Plus we all have our music out there for you to listen to so you can judge if it sounds like it is well recorded.Reïst wrote: Oops. For some reason I had them fused as one in my brain. I've checked around a bit online, and they both seem to be quite favorably reviewed. Would you recommend the Studio Projects B1 over the Behringer B1?
Of course the best thing would be for you to try them out yourself.
"Writing about music is like dancing about architecture" -Unknown
"Seems to me this is the point of Songfight" - Max The Cat
"Seems to me this is the point of Songfight" - Max The Cat
- Reist
- Roosevelt
- Posts: 3066
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 2:26 pm
- Instruments: Drums, Guitar
- Recording Method: Yamaha AW1600, Reaper
- Submitting as: Therman
- Location: Calgary
- Contact:
Re: Another thread about vocals
Is that possible without buying them?Steve Durand wrote:Of course the best thing would be for you to try them out yourself.
- Märk
- Churchill
- Posts: 2048
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 8:35 pm
- Instruments: Guitar, bass
- Recording Method: Presonus Audiobox 44VSL, Cubase
- Submitting as: ROTR, svenmullet, I forget what else
- Pronouns: master
- Location: Canada
Re: Another thread about vocals
Again, I can't stress the importance of at least trying an SM58. Shure got it right like 40 years ago, and thousands of recording artists can't be wrong. With a 58, you can scream like a maniac, and it will sound good. I guarantee it. If you want to do softer, folksy, emotional vox, get a condenser. (you can do this stuff on a 58 too, just crank up the preamp gain)
* this is not a disclaimer
-
- Orwell
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 1:26 pm
- Instruments: trumpet, trombone, sax, clarinet, flute, keyboards, banjo, guitar, bass, ukulele
- Recording Method: SONAR 6, Dell Inspiron E1705, Edirol UA-25, Studio Projects B-1 Mic
- Submitting as: Steve Durand, Elastic Waste Band
- Location: Anaheim, CA
Re: Another thread about vocals
Reïst wrote:Is that possible without buying them?Steve Durand wrote:Of course the best thing would be for you to try them out yourself.
I don't really know of any way to do that. If you lived near me I'd be glad to let you borrow mine.

"Writing about music is like dancing about architecture" -Unknown
"Seems to me this is the point of Songfight" - Max The Cat
"Seems to me this is the point of Songfight" - Max The Cat
- Billy's Little Trip
- Odie
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 2:56 pm
- Instruments: Guitar, Bass, Vocals, Drums, Skin Flute
- Recording Method: analog to digital via Presonus FireBox, Cubase and a porn machine
- Submitting as: Billy's Little Trip, Billy and the Psychotics
- Location: Cali fucking ornia
Re: Another thread about vocals
I have the Behringer B1 and I don't care for it for vocals. Of course, that's just me for the type of vocals that I do and my recording environment. But it does make for a great room mic, where my SM58 does not.
By the way Steve, thanks for pointing out that there are two different B1 mics. All of this time when people were talking about how much they like their B1, I thought they were talking about the one I have. I was starting to think that mine was a dud made by drunk monkeys on a Friday afternoon.
By the way Steve, thanks for pointing out that there are two different B1 mics. All of this time when people were talking about how much they like their B1, I thought they were talking about the one I have. I was starting to think that mine was a dud made by drunk monkeys on a Friday afternoon.

Re: Another thread about vocals
Can that be the title for round 4 of Nur Ein? Or better yet, can we find a way to make it the non-optional challenge?Billy's Little Trip wrote:drunk monkeys on a Friday afternoon.
-
- Goldman
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 11:49 am
- Submitting as: shrts, Sewer Ppl, Flaming Tiger, shrts, shot pounder, Gert, Slither, Gaping Maw
- Pronouns: he/him
- Location: Toronto
Re: Another thread about vocals
You could probably rent one from Long + McQuade for really cheap. I know you could rent a SM58 from there for a couple bucks for the weekend. I don't know about renting the others.Reïst wrote:Is that possible without buying them?
Punk rock is for children. Grab a six-pack at Half-a-Dozen Records.
- Reist
- Roosevelt
- Posts: 3066
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 2:26 pm
- Instruments: Drums, Guitar
- Recording Method: Yamaha AW1600, Reaper
- Submitting as: Therman
- Location: Calgary
- Contact:
Re: Another thread about vocals
That sounds like it could be a good plan.Smalltown Mike wrote:You could probably rent one from Long + McQuade for really cheap. I know you could rent a SM58 from there for a couple bucks for the weekend. I don't know about renting the others.Reïst wrote:Is that possible without buying them?
But from the sounds of it - if I want a dynamic, I should do the SM58. If I want a condenser, the Studio Projects B1 could be awesome, but there's probably more shopping around to do. Maybe today I'll stop by L&M to ask which ones they have - I hate to ask the store guys, but I think I trust them a bit more than you guys do (and the L&M guys are less sketchy than the Axe guys)
-
- Goldman
- Posts: 590
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:50 am
- Instruments: Keyboards (88-note and qwerty), guitar, bass & edrums.
- Recording Method: Pod X3 Live & Yamaha 01X -> Cubase 5 & Komplete 5
- Submitting as: soon as I see a title that inspires me.
- Location: Nottingham.
Re: Another thread about vocals
The SM58 is certainly a decent mic (I have one myself) but I wouldn't dismiss the others out-of-hand. For a start, if you like the SM58, you really want to take a look at the Shure Beta 58, which is like the SM58's big brother.Reïst wrote: But from the sounds of it - if I want a dynamic, I should do the SM58.
obscurity.
"Only the great masters of style ever succeed in being obscure." - Oscar Wilde.
"Only the great masters of style ever succeed in being obscure." - Oscar Wilde.
- jb
- Roosevelt
- Posts: 4200
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:12 am
- Instruments: Guitar, Cello, Keys, Uke, Vox, Perc
- Recording Method: Logic X
- Submitting as: The John Benjamin Band
- Pronouns: he/him
- Location: WASHINGTON, DC
- Contact:
Re: Another thread about vocals
Wow this has dragged on. Here is your prescription.
1. Try the no-money fix first. I think it was Lunkhead who gave you directions for that. Use your existing equipment better-- position yourself to sing correctly into the microphone-- six inches away or less with appropriate gain adjustments to avoid clipping. Take your resulting vocal track and normalize it, then apply EQ (your software may have a generic setting that will improve the sound without your having to know anything), then apply compression (again, look for a preset that sounds good-- try them out, one at a time).
2. If results are unsatisfactory, get an SM58. If it doesn't work for this purpose, you can use it for something else-- mic an amp, mic a guitar, play a show, etc. Do all the stuff in step 1 with the SM58.
3. If the SM58, plus the software improvements don't work, get the Studio Projects B1.
Getting a new mic can remove some of the hassle of getting a good sound, so you don't have to know so much about EQ, compression etc. HOWEVER, if you don't have a lot of money, and judging by the lengthy discussion here about which $100 microphone to buy I suspect that you in that situation, then resign yourself to study and trial and error. You can get excellent results from crappy equipment with enough trial and error.
DONE!
1. Try the no-money fix first. I think it was Lunkhead who gave you directions for that. Use your existing equipment better-- position yourself to sing correctly into the microphone-- six inches away or less with appropriate gain adjustments to avoid clipping. Take your resulting vocal track and normalize it, then apply EQ (your software may have a generic setting that will improve the sound without your having to know anything), then apply compression (again, look for a preset that sounds good-- try them out, one at a time).
2. If results are unsatisfactory, get an SM58. If it doesn't work for this purpose, you can use it for something else-- mic an amp, mic a guitar, play a show, etc. Do all the stuff in step 1 with the SM58.
3. If the SM58, plus the software improvements don't work, get the Studio Projects B1.
Getting a new mic can remove some of the hassle of getting a good sound, so you don't have to know so much about EQ, compression etc. HOWEVER, if you don't have a lot of money, and judging by the lengthy discussion here about which $100 microphone to buy I suspect that you in that situation, then resign yourself to study and trial and error. You can get excellent results from crappy equipment with enough trial and error.
DONE!
blippity blop ya don’t stop heyyyyyyyyy
- Reist
- Roosevelt
- Posts: 3066
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 2:26 pm
- Instruments: Drums, Guitar
- Recording Method: Yamaha AW1600, Reaper
- Submitting as: Therman
- Location: Calgary
- Contact:
Re: Another thread about vocals
Sorry to drag this out more but ... I think my problem with that advice is that I'm doing all those things (as well as I understand how to) - I'm starting to think I don't have an ear for what makes a good vocal track - I couldn't tell there was anything wrong with it (aside from the sickly sounds my cold gave it). Was the track muffly? Because I took the bass down and upped the high range. I compressed it mildly so the levels didn't jump as much. I'm just not sure what a good vocal track sounds like or how to alter mine to make it better - my ear just doesn't get it.jb wrote:position yourself to sing correctly into the microphone-- six inches away or less with appropriate gain adjustments to avoid clipping. Take your resulting vocal track and normalize it, then apply EQ (your software may have a generic setting that will improve the sound without your having to know anything), then apply compression (again, look for a preset that sounds good-- try them out, one at a time).
- jb
- Roosevelt
- Posts: 4200
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:12 am
- Instruments: Guitar, Cello, Keys, Uke, Vox, Perc
- Recording Method: Logic X
- Submitting as: The John Benjamin Band
- Pronouns: he/him
- Location: WASHINGTON, DC
- Contact:
Re: Another thread about vocals
Well then perhaps our diagnosis is incorrect and you don't need a new microphone after all. Perhaps you need new monitors, or a set of those headphones Ross Durand just got. What are you mixing on?
You can also Isolate your vocal track and upload it to the forum (the forum supports attachments now!) for other people to play with. Maybe do a new take to get a fresh copy that you haven't messed with. That would take this stale conversation in a new direction
You can also Isolate your vocal track and upload it to the forum (the forum supports attachments now!) for other people to play with. Maybe do a new take to get a fresh copy that you haven't messed with. That would take this stale conversation in a new direction

blippity blop ya don’t stop heyyyyyyyyy
- Märk
- Churchill
- Posts: 2048
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 8:35 pm
- Instruments: Guitar, bass
- Recording Method: Presonus Audiobox 44VSL, Cubase
- Submitting as: ROTR, svenmullet, I forget what else
- Pronouns: master
- Location: Canada
Re: Another thread about vocals
Hey, Reist, check this guy out- he's in Edmonton. If you have the cash, get the sm57 too...
* this is not a disclaimer
- Lunkhead
- Rosselli
- Posts: 8482
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 12:14 pm
- Instruments: many
- Recording Method: cubase/mac/tascam4x4
- Submitting as: Berkeley Social Scene
- Pronouns: he/him
- Location: Central Oregon
- Contact:
Re: Another thread about vocals
The fact that you had a cold may have a lot to do with the issues. JB is right, too, that if you upload a raw track then we can figure out how far you can get with just post-processing, and how much you need a better signal chain.
- Rabid Garfunkel
- Churchill
- Posts: 2468
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 12:43 pm
- Instruments: Absurdity
- Recording Method: iPhone, Reason & rando apps/toys
- Submitting as: Rabid Garfunkel, Primitive Screwheads
- Pronouns: that guy
- Location: Hollywood, Calif.
Re: Another thread about vocals
[offtopic] JB's urban Clayton Moore avatar freaks me out. [/offtopic]
- jb
- Roosevelt
- Posts: 4200
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:12 am
- Instruments: Guitar, Cello, Keys, Uke, Vox, Perc
- Recording Method: Logic X
- Submitting as: The John Benjamin Band
- Pronouns: he/him
- Location: WASHINGTON, DC
- Contact:
Re: Another thread about vocals
Ha! Bingo! It was for Halloween last year. I went around all night shouting "Tau Lambda Rho!" I had a holster with two cans of Coors Light.Rabid Garfunkel wrote:[offtopic] JB's urban Clayton Moore avatar freaks me out. [/offtopic]
I'M NEVER TAKING THE MASK OFF IN PUBLIC.
blippity blop ya don’t stop heyyyyyyyyy
- Reist
- Roosevelt
- Posts: 3066
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 2:26 pm
- Instruments: Drums, Guitar
- Recording Method: Yamaha AW1600, Reaper
- Submitting as: Therman
- Location: Calgary
- Contact:
Re: Another thread about vocals
jb wrote:Well then perhaps our diagnosis is incorrect and you don't need a new microphone after all. Perhaps you need new monitors, or a set of those headphones Ross Durand just got. What are you mixing on?
You can also Isolate your vocal track and upload it to the forum (the forum supports attachments now!) for other people to play with. Maybe do a new take to get a fresh copy that you haven't messed with. That would take this stale conversation in a new direction
Was the track for Sleepwalking bad enough for it to be used as an example? I don't feel like sending out the tracks for the other one, since I don't really like the song. If Sleepwalking's fine, I'll set up some links. Do you want links to every track in the song, or just the vocal ones?Lunkhead wrote:The fact that you had a cold may have a lot to do with the issues. JB is right, too, that if you upload a raw track then we can figure out how far you can get with just post-processing, and how much you need a better signal chain.
- Lunkhead
- Rosselli
- Posts: 8482
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 12:14 pm
- Instruments: many
- Recording Method: cubase/mac/tascam4x4
- Submitting as: Berkeley Social Scene
- Pronouns: he/him
- Location: Central Oregon
- Contact:
Re: Another thread about vocals
"Sleepwalking" should be fine. Just the raw unprocessed/un-eq'd/etc. main vocal track should be enough. And according to JB you could even just attach a file to a post to the boards. (Sounds neat-o.)
- Adam!
- Niemöller
- Posts: 1433
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:10 am
- Instruments: Drum 'n' Bass (but not THAT Drum 'n' Bass)
- Recording Method: Reaper + Stock Plugins
- Submitting as: Max Bombast
- Pronouns: he/him
- Location: Victoria, BC, AwesomeLand
- Contact:
Re: Another thread about vocals
So much about the song dictates the appropriate vocal processing, so I don't know what I'd do with just the solo'd vocal. If you do upload dry source tracks, I hope you upload Kick Start: I love that song, and I'll happily mix the fuck out of it (and post what I did).
Full Disclosure: I was going to ask you if I could mix this song, anyway. I have some multi-track drum tricks I want to try out, but no appropriate drum tracks of my own. I didn't ask earlier because you were still in Nur Ein.
Full Disclosure: I was going to ask you if I could mix this song, anyway. I have some multi-track drum tricks I want to try out, but no appropriate drum tracks of my own. I didn't ask earlier because you were still in Nur Ein.