Any US produce usually has big US flags printed all over it. I think you'll find most of that stuff is added at (or for) the destination, not the origin.Lord of Oats wrote:I find it weird and maybe a little jingoistic that nearly all the Australian produce I see in the US has a big kangaroo on the sticker. As if you employed them as farmhands or something. It makes no sense.
Does all the US produce have a deer on it or something?
Also: Do Australians find deer and bighorn sheep to be as weird as I find kangaroos and koalas? Are NZ and AUS fauna distinctly mutually weird enough that you blokes only have to take a short boat ride to marvel at wildlife? How about bears? There aren't bears there, right? Your predecessors got rid of all those big carnivorous kangaroos, but the people that settled this continent left bears all over. I don't even go in the woods at night here.
Deer are not weird - they are feral pests. And sheep in many cases (especially in NZ) are life-partner choices. (always be careful when using the term "big horn" in relation to sheep)
No - there are no bears in Australia. The only native placental mammals are bats. And maybe dogs, rats and humans - though is is debatable if the latter three are "native", but they were "introduced" almost 100,000 years ago.
And yes, the ecological equivalent of alpha predators such as bears would have been thylacoleo - the "marsupial lion", or "carniverous kangaroo" if you like. I don't think they were directly "gotten rid of by my predecessors" - they more fell victim to rapid ecosystem change due to the changing fire regime in the country, both from human burning and natural climate change. Smaller carnivores like thylacines lost out in competition with dogs - to be finally wiped out by Europeans in the 19thC. All that are left now are the increasingly rare cat-like carnivores such as quolls and Tasmanian devils. Australia's main alpha predators now (apart from humans) are salt-water crocodiles, wedge-tailed eagles and feral animals like dogs, cats and pigs.
And no, NZ and AUS fauna are not distinctly mutually weird enough that us blokes only have to take a short boat ride to marvel at wildlife. I must admit - I am finding NZ quite disappointing on that front. Firstly - NZ has virtually no native fauna. No native mammals at all. And of the interesting birds that still remain, such as kiwi and kakapo etc. they are extremely rare and never encountered casually. NZ ecosystems have become far more "Europeanised" than Australia. There are feral birds and animals and weeds everywhere. Looking out my window now here deep in rural NZ I see an oak tree and apple tree with blackbirds, sparrows, pigeons, starlings and Indian myna birds flying around. Not particularly inspiring.
And they have a big feral animal problem here. Far more introduced carnivores than we have in Aus. What native birds they have left are being quickly wiped out by these weird little things like weasels, stoats and ferrets. And Australian brush-tail possums are killing what's left of their native forests.
Admittedly - I haven't had much chance to travel here yet. And where I am is very disturbed as it is all farmland. I am looking forward to seeing some of the kauri forests in the north. And I do know from going there years ago, that the southern beech forests in the south-west of the South Island are very spectacular. Living remnants of the old Gondwanaland