I think his name IS Noel.Elvis wrote:D'oh - I left someguycallednoel off my review list. Nice guitar work. Reminds me of Beatles "Blackbird" and "Dear Prudence."
/end retard humour
I think his name IS Noel.Elvis wrote:D'oh - I left someguycallednoel off my review list. Nice guitar work. Reminds me of Beatles "Blackbird" and "Dear Prudence."
When you're EQing, are you doing it by ear, or by watching a spectrum analyzer? I find that a spectrum analyzer helps a LOT because it shows you exactly where things are clipping and distorting and the like. I especially like how Logic's ChanEQ lets you overlay an analyzer over the EQ controls so there's a direct one-to-one mapping, rather than having to figure out which knobs map to what spikes.Leaf wrote:My mixes STILL have this tight, narrow stereo, heavy almost muddy thing going on... or at least, that's how I hear it a few days later. Maybe it's the garage I'm mixing in. Maybe it's my fucked up hearing. Maybe not stepping away long enought to let it settle. I dunno. where's Rick Rubin when i need him???
**head asplode**BLT wrote:But still, I like to hear how my sound compares to a professional sound. So I'll look for Fluffy's analaser tool.
For anyone reckless enough to mix using this approach: Always remember how a good mix is supposed to look. Only reduce the BAD spikes. If you reduce the good spikes, or worse if you boost some of the BAD DIPS, your mix will not look right.fluffy wrote:I find that a spectrum analyzer helps a LOT because it shows you exactly where things are clipping and distorting and the like [...] there's a direct one-to-one mapping, rather than having to figure out which knobs map to what spikes.
Dear Gertrude,gert wrote:You want to "hear" how your sound compares by "looking" at a spectrum analyzer? Good luck with that!
Will it be easy to tell when I'm looking at it which are the rök spikes and which are the folkie spikes?gert wrote:Always remember how a good mix is supposed to look. Only reduce the BAD spikes. If you reduce the good spikes, or worse if you boost some of the BAD DIPS, your mix will not look right.
That's OK, "Sexual Healing" didn't really get much air play.Rone Rivendale wrote:That said, I didn't notice it was a sample until I read the reviews.
Comfortably the nicest thing anyone has ever said about anything i've ever penned..and also most likely the best songfight tittle that never will be..tonetripper wrote: Lasting Impression: Like having a smoke after my necrophiliac affair.
Haha yeah, that's all I heard. That said, yea for Melvin breaking out of the mold. Nice to hear some variety is possible. Keep stretching.Smalltown Mike wrote:That's OK, "Sexual Healing" didn't really get much air play.Rone Rivendale wrote:That said, I didn't notice it was a sample until I read the reviews.
According to a well known free online encyclopedia:Smalltown Mike wrote:That's OK, "Sexual Healing" didn't really get much air play.Rone Rivendale wrote:That said, I didn't notice it was a sample until I read the reviews.
No midi here, but I can see what you're saying. I wanted a really electronic sound for this - I love that kind of stuff, not sure if it entirely fits the song though.king_arthur wrote:Rhythm guitars sound good, the lead whatever at the start
sounds a bit too MIDI-fied.