Thanks to everybody for the feedback so far; here's some notes on what was going on with this recording re: your comments.
Generic wrote:Josh Millard - I find it interesting how sometimes, fighters with alphabetically proximate names wind up constantly following each other. Your songs and mine seem to form interesting compliments. I'm slightly bothered by the fact that this song can't seem to decide whether it's in a major key or a minor key. Oh well; your lyrics are great. I was expecting a second verse; got a fadeout instead. I wish it were a touch longer, but that's way better than wishing it were shorter. you get a vote! (You're three for three with me so far!)
Too short is definitely better than too long, always. But it should have been longer, I just ran out of time to give it the proper treatment I'd have preferred to. As for mode, I don't think a song always has to pick minor or major -- this one changes feels kind of aggressively for sure, but there's a lot of fun movement to be had in explicitly rejecting harmonic expectations a little if your goal isn't specifically to make the listener comfy. I've written so many straightforward four chord songs over the years that I try and at least weird it up a little when I can these days.
And yeah, we do seem to be in kind of similar places in terms of writing/arrangement sentiment. Curious!
Rabid Garfunkel wrote:Mixing Reason tracks with live instruments is a bitch, ain't it? I like where your head's at, man. Let's start a band.
Heh. No Reason on this (I played with it some a few years ago but these days do basically everything as live takes of physical instruments, or maybe an iphone/ipad toy if I need a cute synth); that stuff in the intro and outro is actually just loops of a stretched-out slice of the descending line near the end of the song. I recorded the intro drums and bass and guitar against a scratch piano track that I recorded ahead of time to fill the right space and time, did the rest of the song, and then went back and used PaulStretch on a sans-vox bounce of the "shadows on a wall of a cave in an allegory" bit, and jimmied that into the front and back of the song.
Frostytheshowman wrote: The only part of this I am not digging is the kind of staticy cymbal sound washing over the piano in the intro and outro.
Yeah, I'm not in love with it either. See above: the biggest problem with using PaulStretch to create the ethereal stuff at the front end is that it has a really, really characteristic effect on the sound that it processes. If you missed the whole ridiculous Justin Bieber Slowed Down thing a couple weeks ago, I dorked out about it
on my music blog and rounded up some of the basic story. Short version is that stuff put through PaulStretch gets effectively "smeared" to keep it from ending up super choppy the way naive time-stretching algorithms tend to go, and so transients disappear and turn into slow crashing waves of sound.
So this is kind of a proof of concept and unfortunately I didn't have time to refine it at all -- just bounce, stretch times four, insert. I'd have loved to play with it more carefully and will probably do so for some future recording, but I liked the idea of using a seriously distorted portion of the song as its own intro and outro enough to just run with this as it came out. Total sucker for self-reference.
Frostytheshowman wrote: Sounds like you're really getting into it, and I'm nodding along.
I've been trying to get really energetic recordings. Working fast is probably helping there because it doesn't let me slow down and overthink. One of my goals long term is to find a way to keep some of the headlong spazz-out energy of these NO TIME, NO TIME! recordings when coming back to give the actual mechanics of a song the time and treatment they deserve to get past "this is sloppy but fun!" to "this is fucking TIGHT and fun!"
Oddly enough, one of the things I realized I disliked about this one once it was too late to fix it is that the tempo is pretty damned sluggish. I cranked it back ten bpm from my initial instinct, and that was a mistake; I might even have wanted to crank it UP a little from there, something like 155 or 160. As is it works okay but it feels sort of deliberate where it should feel insistent-bordering-on-frenetic.
BBABM wrote: hmm... i like it... it confuses me... i want it to be longer
Yeah, the proper treatment for this would have had at least a second verse, and the slow-down thing at the end of the chorus (if we want to call the "shadows..." line the chorus) would be a coda on the end, not a standard part of it. I'll keep chewing on this one, I think it's worth trying to develop into the sort of epic thing it wanted to be in the first place.
TheCapitalistYouth wrote:I'm sure other people will talk about this, but the guitars sound really muted.
Some of that is just me not taking enough time to mix I think (and maybe overcorrecting a bit from last round's HEY ALL I CAN HEAR IS THE GUITAR disaster) but, yeah, in general I'm still struggling with how to capture really solid electric guitar tones. I play an L6-S through a 2x12 Fender Deville in a big unfinished basement, and tend to one-mic the amp from between 6 and 12 inches off one of the cones with an unremarkable dynamic mic, and sometimes it works well and sometimes not so well and I haven't really gotten my head around how to nail a specific tone. I've got a PodXT I use occasionally to try and shape the signal going in but I tend to like to keep things really simple so it's mostly a matter of me tweaking settings on the amp itself.