How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Discuss upcoming, current, and previous song fights.
booty
Karski
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 5:06 pm
Location: SF Bay Area

Re: How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Post by booty »

Dinnertime Boys wrote:Hi, i just wanted to start this off by addressing the comments I always get about doing an instrumental. I think that bad vocals can kill a song, and I'm usually much more grateful for an OK instrumental than a song with warbly singing and all that.
I view this as masterbating vs. having sex. Yeah it's always nice to do but until you place it where it counts...it don't count. Go for it! Fuck instrumentals on Songfight. They are lame. Nobody wants to hear about someone masterbating; now having sex, that is a different story. I'd rather hear "warbly" vox with someone trying to get better at singing and the whole production process of singing than jerking around with a keyboard. :D
User avatar
BBABM
Goldman
Posts: 666
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 11:34 pm
Instruments: Guitar, Voice, drums
Recording Method: Session, fruity loops
Submitting as: Bad Boys at Bat Mitzvahs, Fitzroy
Location: Charlottesville, Va

Re: How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Post by BBABM »

Plus the point is kinda for the song to be "inspired" by the title... Not just slapped on in post
User avatar
Manhattan Glutton
Niemöller
Posts: 1530
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:10 pm
Instruments: Angst
Recording Method: REAPER
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Re: How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Post by Manhattan Glutton »

There have been some good instrumentals that actually did feel inspired by the title (Lonbobby songs come to mind). But if DTB slapped on the title after the song, that's just wrong. Although, that's not enough for me to demand warbly vocals.
If I had a dollar for every one of my songs j$ has called a 90s pastiche, I'd have $1 for every song I've written.

Nur Ein Archives | The New Ugly Podcast
Dinnertime Boys
A New Player
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 9:41 am
Submitting as: The Dinnertime Boys

Re: How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Post by Dinnertime Boys »

hmmm......
Last edited by Dinnertime Boys on Wed Feb 09, 2011 1:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
booty
Karski
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 5:06 pm
Location: SF Bay Area

Re: How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Post by booty »

No rules. Just opinions. That is why you are here, right? Throw out a song and see how people react to it.
User avatar
Manhattan Glutton
Niemöller
Posts: 1530
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:10 pm
Instruments: Angst
Recording Method: REAPER
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Re: How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Post by Manhattan Glutton »

http://songfight.org/faq.html wrote:1. Write a song based on one of the titles posted.
Bill Clinton: Well, it depends on your definition of the word "based".
If I had a dollar for every one of my songs j$ has called a 90s pastiche, I'd have $1 for every song I've written.

Nur Ein Archives | The New Ugly Podcast
User avatar
irwin
Goldman
Posts: 621
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:09 pm
Instruments: insecurity
Recording Method: scotch
Submitting as: suckweasel, kasper, nutwalls
Location: Woodland, CA

Re: How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Post by irwin »

If you don't follow the rules, your song will be ineligible for the cash prize, should it win.
"Ouch. I wonder if this guy sounds like this when he speaks." -- Puce
User avatar
inevitableguy
Goldman
Posts: 534
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 9:19 am
Instruments: Stuff with strings, vocals, poor drum machine programming
Recording Method: Roland VS-1880
Submitting as: Naked Philosophy
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Re: How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Post by inevitableguy »

Manhattan Glutton wrote: Bill Clinton: Well, it depends on your definition of the word "based".
I did not base my song on sexual relations with that woman.
==========================================
Naked Philosophy, The Tedward Nixon Experience
==========================================
"Brilliant and disastrous at almost the exact same time" - Melvin
User avatar
BBABM
Goldman
Posts: 666
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 11:34 pm
Instruments: Guitar, Voice, drums
Recording Method: Session, fruity loops
Submitting as: Bad Boys at Bat Mitzvahs, Fitzroy
Location: Charlottesville, Va

Re: How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Post by BBABM »

http://songfight.org/faq.html

This has all the "rules" in writing, if you wanna call it that. I had to be shown myself after making similar mistakes. It's more a right way of entering a song fight, and a code of ethics, than following a checklist of rules. at least that's what I got from it.
User avatar
jonthecomposer
A New Player
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:53 pm
Instruments: BASS
Recording Method: 80s Realistic mixer, Radio Shack Mic, & SONAR
Submitting as: Jon Wilson
Location: BFE (No really, it's in Southern Illinois. Look up "Little Egypt." Yeah. I live THERE)

Re: How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Post by jonthecomposer »

Dinnertime Boys wrote: Jon Wilson: I don't know a lot about metal, but I thought this was good. I was impressed by the chanting parts, and the overall sound quality. Your singing is good enough to warrant including vocals.
Thank you! I'm glad I got it as good as I did considering I was running out of time. I didn't even have the chorus written until the night before the deadline. I tracked four separate guitars and separately emulated amp modules as well as not being used to playing a guitar OR with a pick (since I play bass normally). And the music wasn't written fully until 2 days before the deadline. Once that was all done, I had to mix and "apply effects" to each track and mix it down (my computer is old) then archive each set of tracks that I mixed off of. Starting out, there were 1 bomb track, 1 air raid siren track, 1 machine gun track, 1 dive bomber track, one marching track, 4 vocal tracks, 4 guitar tracks, 1 bass track, 1 pipe organ track, one synth track, and one programmed midi drum track (yes, I put every single little note into the piano roll for the drums and the beginning "war" sounds were hand-"placed and stretched" sound bytes, not acidized). Once all the premixing and archiving was done, I did a final mixdown to one track then another for "sweetening" the last mixdown track. Overall, I ended up with like 32 tracks, but not all sounding at once. And 95% of the mixing part took place on the last day! Oy :/
Andy Balham wrote: Jon Wilson
This is the highlight of the fight for me and reminds me why listening to the songs here is always worthwhile. Very well executed, with a hint of Iron Maiden-esque prog leaning.
Thank you! I am truly humbled by your compliment!
Dinnertime Boys wrote:Hi, i just wanted to start this off by addressing the comments I always get about doing an instrumental. I think that bad vocals can kill a song, and I'm usually much more grateful for an OK instrumental than a song with warbly singing and all that. There have been many worthy instrumentals, and in fact some of my favourite songs were instrumentals, such as Bathroom Girl by Air, or Peaches En Regalia by Frank Zappa. Not only that, but IDGAF about lyrics, and I almost never pay attention to them when I listen to music. I understand that people seem to think you should focus on making your song relevant to the song title, but to me, a song title is just the thing you slap on a song after you finish so that it can be identified.
Thank you for saying that!!! My thoughts EXACTLY!
I played swing and jazz on the trumpet from the time I was in 6th grade all the way through college. I couldn't even vibrato my voice effectively until I was almost 21. It took a LOT of practice to be able to get my voice to do what my brain wanted it to.... and I still don't like my tone and lack of control! So I am used to playing a LOT of instrumental stuff. Personally, I think that not considering something as a valid *song* simply based on the exclusion of vocals is almost like saying a Ferrari isn't a valid car based on the exclusion of sports/racing tires.
User avatar
bdog5778
Karski
Posts: 92
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:18 am
Recording Method: Schecter Tempest, First Act VW, Sonar, Superior Drummer, Melodyne, Toneport UX8
Submitting as: Metaluna
Contact:

Re: How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Post by bdog5778 »

DTB,

I've had this conversation here before. Useless exercise because there will inevitably be some 'tard who makes the comment that they can't see how the song is related to the title (when "inspired by" is the requirement).

Frankly, one of the best songs I've ever written was for "Robot Nina Zombie Bear" (attached). Didn't submit due to lack of vocals. It wouldn't have won, but whatever (not exactly a metal audience -but that's another conversation I've had here). Finding the right voice -even if it's your own- is the key. Of course, If the vocals truly aren't necessary, well, you can still rock out to "Orion". :twisted:

{Note: Yes, I realize that the .mp3 has a creation date of August 2010 while the RNZB fight was at the end of March 2010. Computer was destroyed by UPS and had to mixdown again. Remember, folks: always insure for the actual value of the item! $128 compensation for the destruction of a $1200 computer. Oi.]

Jon,

I enjoyed the music on your RN website, but "via Sunderland" is a cut above. This is why I keep coming back to SF 8) You never know when an odd title is going to spur your creativity to new heights.
Attachments
robotninjazombiebear.mp3
(4.43 MiB) Downloaded 142 times
"In Heavy Metal... Precision is ALL. ALL THINGS TO ALL MEN AT ALL TIMES.... HAHAHA. Yes indeedy." --Slipperman

www.metalunarocks.com
historyman68
Karski
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 7:52 pm
Submitting as: Iqballers (it's pronounced Ick-ballers!)
Location: Providence, RI
Contact:

Re: How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Post by historyman68 »

To throw my cents in about the instrumental deal, it works when it's appropriate. Here, it seemed to fit tonally.

Na style ja

Nice beats and tones
Rap a little lackluster but kind of endearing
Chorus is good, though- singing works 
I like the instruments at the end, too.

Yeah, I like the idea of the rap, but the rap itself just doesn't quite work for me, sorry. Every other element of the song is great, though- beat, music, chorus.
Vote: maybe?

Jon Wilstein
Someone mentioned Rammstein- yes, definitely!
Great impression of them
I could tell exactly what the chorus was gonna do, but works
Nails the bombast and drama of Rammstein, but doesn't make a huge impression on me overall
Definitely skilled- I kept turning up my headphones many times while I was listening, which is a good sign

Vote: maybe?

Criminals
I feel like i'm listening to a song by a character in a McG movie
I like the speaking, somewhat compelling
Beat is a little NIN, I like it
It's a good mood piece, a little insubstantial but I like it
Brevity is nice
Were you the one talking about how you don't like namedropping the title because it feels corny? Because if it was, I'm with you here- it works without the words "via Sunderland" ever coming up

Vote: maybe? Probably.


Community payback
I like the tone. Kinda reminds me of the end of the Wilco track "less than you think" but it's not as headache-inducing. Have you listened to spiritualized? It's a bit like their "pure phase" tracks.
I keep having to turn down the volume, though.
Oh, YOU'RE the guy who didn't like dropping the title of the song! Hey, this definitely evokes "via sunderland" to me. It would definitely not fit "cakes" or "staring at the sea" (though staring at the sea marginally better, I suppose).
Evokes bomb sirens, air raid horns, very nice.

Vote: probably

CHADtheDAD
I like the shambling intro and atonalness
Ah, Tom Waits
Lyrics work with the song, but don't quite do it for me
Instrumental could use a little variation- it's a little too static, especially since you can hear the abrupt loop cut

Vote: maybe? I dunno

Shamanizer
I like the sonic texture, but it would work better as an intro- doesn't quite come together
I like the screechy solo
It's got a bit of a Gorillaz feel to it
Kinda dig it

Vote? God, i don't know!

Naked philosophy 
Nice old school punk sound
Voices, production, drums, guitar seem not quite raw enough to really work in this context
I like the chorus- maybe catchiest so far
And short, too! I like this trend! (this makes me a huge hypocrite, with my 6 minute song.)

Vote: probably not, but maybe?

BBABM
Haha only song to use the title as a person's name
I love it- great groove, brief, fun

Vote: yes

Bobby davros
Nice rockin feel
Pretty good delivery
"shot a 12 year old" a little jarring but I guess it's about a criminal
I like it but it doesn't quite do it for me
I feel like some high "woo woo"s in the end of the song might have made it for me

Vote: probably not

Paco del stinko

Great intro
When the song comes in it's not quite as good but it rocks thoroughly
Messiah line a bit obvious feeling
Yeah it rocks
Almost wish it were a bit longer

Vote: yah, I think so


The Voices (me & roommate)
Is my voice a little too loud?
I think it rocks. My casio is awesome, though I did want to vary the drumbeat during chorus
I really like the unintentional chorus3 breakdown
If it's any consolation, the music at the end could have been about a minute longer- I edited it down
Not sure if the cymbal at the end adds to the atmosphere or hurts it
I gotta say, I like the ending- it loses direction for a second, but ends so nicely. Very pretty.
I kind of wanted to put some more of the end at the beginning, as a sort of mellow intro, but looks like Paco del Stinko beat me to it 
I've gotten critique on the vocals, I think their occasional off-keyness is made up for by the evocative delivery, especially by the backup.
I have gotten used to my vocals being an acquired taste, and would love more time to refine them further (this was another optional challenge -don't plan ahead) - I would also have liked the freedom to really belt out the chorus as I heard it in my head but didn't want to wake the neighbors.


Good fight, stop arguing about the damn instrumental- happens every time someone has one. It's not prohibited, just use common sense. 
"completely tramples any established production conventions." -Humbert
"I really have to curb my enthusiasm for flowery hyperbole" -Humbert

myspace.com/iqballers (it's pronounced "Ick-Ballers")
User avatar
jonthecomposer
A New Player
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:53 pm
Instruments: BASS
Recording Method: 80s Realistic mixer, Radio Shack Mic, & SONAR
Submitting as: Jon Wilson
Location: BFE (No really, it's in Southern Illinois. Look up "Little Egypt." Yeah. I live THERE)

Re: How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Post by jonthecomposer »

bdog5778 wrote: I enjoyed the music on your RN website, but "via Sunderland" is a cut above. This is why I keep coming back to SF 8) You never know when an odd title is going to spur your creativity to new heights.
Thanks..... and might I just add HOLY FARKING SCHNIT!!!

Your attachment f'ing rocked!!!

See, I usually write funk. Metal is not my forte. Actually, the main riff (at the end of the chorus over "Via Sunderland") was the very first "metal" riff I'd ever written. It was written in 1987 on a MANDOLIN of all things, lol. I just never got around to putting it on anything until now.
User avatar
jonthecomposer
A New Player
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:53 pm
Instruments: BASS
Recording Method: 80s Realistic mixer, Radio Shack Mic, & SONAR
Submitting as: Jon Wilson
Location: BFE (No really, it's in Southern Illinois. Look up "Little Egypt." Yeah. I live THERE)

Re: How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Post by jonthecomposer »

historyman68 wrote: Jon Wilstein
Someone mentioned Rammstein- yes, definitely!
Great impression of them
I could tell exactly what the chorus was gonna do, but works
Nails the bombast and drama of Rammstein, but doesn't make a huge impression on me overall
Definitely skilled- I kept turning up my headphones many times while I was listening, which is a good sign

Vote: maybe?
 
Thanks :)
Ha ha, yeah. The chorus was part of my "study" in how they put their stuff together. It fit the war theme, so I went with it.

By the way, if you have headphones with really good bass response, listen for the hyper-low freq. pipe organ pedal notes during the chorus. They'll rattle your brain!!! lol
Stu
Karski
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:07 pm
Instruments: Guitar, Bass, Keyboards, Finale
Recording Method: Adobe Audition
Submitting as: Stu Jordan, Theophilus Monk, The 'Scow
Location: California
Contact:

Re: How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Post by Stu »

I haven't submitted in far too long. Right now, I'm visiting friends but they're at work and I have nothing else to do, so why not do some reviews?

Shamanizer – There doesn’t seem to be any rhyme or reason to this one. You may as well be mumbling and randomly hitting the hi-hat button.

Naked Philosophy – I love the guitar tone here, but doing the root-5th-root-5th thing in the bass during the chorus makes it sound more like a polka than I think you really want it to based on the rest of the song. Not doing it for me.

Bobby Davros – I’ve never been a fan of this shout/talk singing thing. It’s one of my least favorite things about the Sex Pistols, of which there are many. The whole tune just seems like it’s the same thing. I know there was a guitar solo in the middle there, but I felt nothing throughout.

CHADtheDAD – That’s an interesting chord progression you’ve got there. I was kinda expecting an instrumental before the vocals came in. I like what you’re doing with the lead guitar. The interesting chord progression loses its charm after it’s repeated so much with nothing of contrast. Would benefit with a B section at least.

Community Payback – Is that you, Brian Eno? Ambient music is the worst.

The Voices – The lead guitar goes out of key a few times, as well as the voice, but I’m sure you knew that. Pretty decent, pretty competent (The background vocals are nice), but overall the only musically interesting parts of it are the last four measures of the chorus. It also goes on too long. It could probably end about a minute and a half before it does, but the mish-mash of vocals near the end is nice, but once again, could’ve been cut way down. Keep at it, keep writing songs and learning how to put music together. I can see good thing in your future if you do.

Bad Boys At Bat Mitzvahs – Competent drumming. A catchy tune, but right where you ended it, I was expecting there to be a kick ass bridge of some sort and then back into another verse or just the chorus, but it wasn’t to be, apparently. I think the song would’ve benefited highly from that. I want to vote for it, but I just see how much better it could be if you had that third section and I can’t get over that.

Criminals – Lots of electronic-type music this week, and the second entry with more speak-singing than I care for. There’s really nothing to this song musically. Pretty boring.

The Dinnertime Boys – Continuing with the electronic sounds. At least this one is catchy. The harmony is good. I don’t think I’d listen to it regularly or anything, but it would make good music for a traveling montage or something, which is perhaps what you were going for. I’ll vote for it, but just barely.

Jon Wilson – Heavy stuff, my man. It’s nice to hear some heavy distortion because this fight has been almost entirely driven by electronic stuff. The B section is nice, almost regal when you start singing. Sounds pretty good. Everything is produced very well. The riff after the regal singing is very nice. Even though I don’t like the speak-singing during the verses, I’ll give this one a vote.

Na Style Jaa – Another electronic driven song. Your flow is nice, and at least you’re not going for the nerdcore thing. The beat is pretty good, but not great. The chorus melody is pretty catchy too. That toy piano sounding thing is a nice touch near the end too, but right at the end of the phrase, it goes off key which maybe you intended, but it just doesn’t sound great. Vibes sound nice too. Pretty decent overall, but not quite worthy of a vote.

Paco del Stinko – Nice production. Vocals are performed fine, everything is in tune and all. When the heavy stuff kicked in, I thought “Nice work holding out til then.” Not a very catchy tune, though. Proficient guitar as always, but unfortunately, that’s about all it has going for it.

I'll admit that I haven't listened to as many fights as lots of people on the site, but this was probably the weakest fight I've ever listened to in full. I didn't really like any of these entries, except for Bad Boys At Bat Mitzvahs which I couldn't bring myself to vote for because it's incomplete and needs more.

Top 3
#1: Jon Wilson
#2: The Dinnertime Boys
#3: Bad Boys At Bat Mitzvahs
User avatar
BBABM
Goldman
Posts: 666
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 11:34 pm
Instruments: Guitar, Voice, drums
Recording Method: Session, fruity loops
Submitting as: Bad Boys at Bat Mitzvahs, Fitzroy
Location: Charlottesville, Va

Re: How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Post by BBABM »

Stu wrote:
Bad Boys At Bat Mitzvahs – Competent drumming. A catchy tune, but right where you ended it, I was expecting there to be a kick ass bridge of some sort and then back into another verse or just the chorus, but it wasn’t to be, apparently. I think the song would’ve benefited highly from that. I want to vote for it, but I just see how much better it could be if you had that third section and I can’t get over that.
I agree, and had I more time, I would have come up with more... And it would have been way better. The drumming, unfortunately, is a midi loop that I messed with a bit, so I can't take credit in any way for their competency.
I've continued working on a few of my song fight songs, and a "kick ass bridge" may be what turns this song into an awesome song. Thanks for listening!
historyman68
Karski
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 7:52 pm
Submitting as: Iqballers (it's pronounced Ick-ballers!)
Location: Providence, RI
Contact:

Re: How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Post by historyman68 »

Jon: I've had the chorus of your song stuck in my head for the past few days, so I think I'm probably gonna have to put in a vote for you, too. And I just listened to every song once, so by that dubious logic, yours is the catchiest of all!
"completely tramples any established production conventions." -Humbert
"I really have to curb my enthusiasm for flowery hyperbole" -Humbert

myspace.com/iqballers (it's pronounced "Ick-Ballers")
User avatar
jonthecomposer
A New Player
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:53 pm
Instruments: BASS
Recording Method: 80s Realistic mixer, Radio Shack Mic, & SONAR
Submitting as: Jon Wilson
Location: BFE (No really, it's in Southern Illinois. Look up "Little Egypt." Yeah. I live THERE)

Re: How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Post by jonthecomposer »

Stu wrote: Jon Wilson – Heavy stuff, my man. It’s nice to hear some heavy distortion because this fight has been almost entirely driven by electronic stuff. The B section is nice, almost regal when you start singing. Sounds pretty good. Everything is produced very well. The riff after the regal singing is very nice. Even though I don’t like the speak-singing during the verses, I’ll give this one a vote.
Thanks, Stu! I was going for that sound during the chorus. Picture two soldiers (possibly English or Irish) walking through a tunnel harmonizing a "patriotic tune" with each other.
historyman68 wrote:Jon: I've had the chorus of your song stuck in my head for the past few days, so I think I'm probably gonna have to put in a vote for you, too. And I just listened to every song once, so by that dubious logic, yours is the catchiest of all!
Thanks, Historyman! As I remember, I did like what you did this songfight better than last time as well. Not to say I am saying anything against your creativity. But I should be giving my review today.... not that it means anything. I just think feedback from many different sources helps everyone to hone their skills.
User avatar
Paco Del Stinko
Roosevelt
Posts: 3548
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 11:20 am
Instruments: Basic rock, at a basic level.
Recording Method: Roland 2480
Submitting as: Paco del Stinko
Location: Massachusetts. God save the Commonwealth!

Re: How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Post by Paco Del Stinko »

Hastily written last minute reviews. Holler if you want further clarification. I agree that this isn't the strongest fight around although every song had at least something good to offer.

Bad Boys at Bat Mitzvahs - Good catchy fun. I like a song that makes you want to hear it again and this does that for both catchiness and needing a little more flesh on its bones. As short as it is however, a simple vocal harmony on the second verse would've sent it to under your skin infection land.

Bobby Davros - Scruffy punky goodness here. Bass driven, really, which is good as that's a nice and nasty bass tone. Ending kind of stalls but that doesn't matter, it's a nice little ride.

CHADtheDAD - A slow spiral into gloom and doom, I think. Nice! Wonderfully moody, musically, anyway. I'm not smart enough to understand the lyrical message, but it can't be cheery. A little scatch-paddish, still good.

Community Payback
- It gets your attention, thinking that something will happen, but it doesn't. Nice moody intro to 'chill music' or whatever that would be called, I suppose. An instrumental inspired by the title might conjure up, say, a subway car, typically, but perhaps this is a spcaeship coming home? Let's say it is.

Criminals - Suspenseful music and vocals that suffer from dynamics. Or lack thereof, rather. Yes, this works quiet and should'nt blast out of the speakers, but it's still a strain to understand both lyrics and music. Music is almost incidental or soundtrackish. Right ideas anyway and I like the subtle train-like rhythm.

The Dinnertime Boys - Sinds like music from a Sims game or the like. Artificial voices might sound nice on top of this. Almost theme music but lacks a strong melody.

Jon Wilson - Very well done amd elaborate. We have one thing in common this week: we both did vocals from a German soldier perspective. Of course, this blows mine out of the water, pathetic pun intended. Makes me want a throat lozenge though. Very well done all around.

Naked Philosophy - That intro chord progression shuldn't work but somehow it does. Yay! The vocals get way too monotone here, especially at the acoustic section and the oh-oh-ohs could be less in your face. A good little tune if incomplete feeling at the end.

Na Style Jaa - Some of the delivery feels stiff, just making it in time. More practice would fix that, I suppose. The chorus is dark and has a bit of catch to it. Nice to hear simple layers come in later on for a splash of needed color. Fits in with the well layered later part of the song.

Paco del Stinko - Yeah, I agree with the reviews here. This was rushed and shoe-horned for sure. An all guitar intro, John Bonham drums. Weak 'story' is about a U-Boat crew surfacing to face a Sunderland airplane that sinks submarines. Thanks Wiki!

shamanizer
- I might like this Ween-o-rama better if I could understand it a bit more besides SF! title writing nods. The echo guitar loops are nice and the mic feedback is good far off in the distance like seagulls.

The Voices - The chord progression is pretty good, as is the ambiant keyboard layers. The chorus idea is good if not executed very well. Drums might have been better off having been used as a guide and then tossed. Good structure, weak performance.
Bringin' the stink since 2006.
User avatar
jonthecomposer
A New Player
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:53 pm
Instruments: BASS
Recording Method: 80s Realistic mixer, Radio Shack Mic, & SONAR
Submitting as: Jon Wilson
Location: BFE (No really, it's in Southern Illinois. Look up "Little Egypt." Yeah. I live THERE)

Re: How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Post by jonthecomposer »

Paco Del Stinko wrote: Jon Wilson - Very well done amd elaborate. We have one thing in common this week: we both did vocals from a German soldier perspective. Of course, this blows mine out of the water, pathetic pun intended. Makes me want a throat lozenge though. Very well done all around.
Thank you, Paco! But your tune was my favorite! I would give yourself more credit, good pun, though :D lol
User avatar
jonthecomposer
A New Player
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:53 pm
Instruments: BASS
Recording Method: 80s Realistic mixer, Radio Shack Mic, & SONAR
Submitting as: Jon Wilson
Location: BFE (No really, it's in Southern Illinois. Look up "Little Egypt." Yeah. I live THERE)

Re: How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Post by jonthecomposer »

Bad Boys at Bat Mitzvahs:
This is great. Good concept, too. I would have never thought of "Via Sunderland" as a name, lol. And although the production isn't stellar, it's definitely not hard on the ears. You seem to do so much in so little time. There's a lot to be said for that!

Bobby Davros:
I love the punk vibe of this tune. I can't even say anything against the production having heard my fair share of bands like the Sex Pistols, lol. As far as a vibe and sound is concerned, you nailed it. I like the tube-driven bass sound as well. My only beef with this tune is the ending. I would have said "keep still and fire" really loudly and irreverently - possibly letting an old-school echo fade out and distort on "fire." But that's not necessarily a point against you :D

CHADtheDAD:
I like how this starts. It reminds me of something Primus (one of my favorite bands) would do. I hear almost a "boom chick" kinda groove behind this, though. In other words, I think it could have went a better place with the groove. But then again, I'm usually not so much for the "ambient" feel as compared to something with a solid drum part - which is ironic considering how my very first entry here was! Overall, I like the vocals and idea. I like the guitar part as well. It's what drives the song forward. Not too shabby, my man.

Community Payback:

Hmmm. I like the beginning, lol. But seriously, as far as experimental music is concerned, there's nothing fundamentally "wrong" with it. I just find it lacks a definite direction. I would save part of what you are doing to use as a beginning to a future tune. Personally, I think that would be killer. If I was reeeeeeeeeally high, this would be some cool background music for sure. I don't think it "fits" in this setting very much, though. Speaking of an "appropriate setting," I do have a friend who does a thing called "video pizza" that is an experimental comedy video of just a rotating pizza from different angles. It parodies the video "yule log" as well as those crappy 80s film strips that we all watched in school (along with the bad 80s filmstrip sound quality). I think he'd probably really like this and maybe even want to put something like that on his next installment. Let me know if you are interested and I'll send you to his page.

Criminals:
Nice atmosphere! I keep looking for a nice, hard-hitting, chorus, though. I like this, but I feel it is simply incomplete. The beginning, verses, and ending are great.

The Dinnertime Boys:
Ha! This is one of my favorites. You probably heard my earlier rant about how instrumentals are valid as well. All I can say is there is good production here and a good melody. I wish it was about twice as long with a good bridge. That would have put it over the top for me. But it is what it is. Good effects. I would have liked to hear more bass even if it were a root-playing synth on the chords somewhere.

Naked Philosophy:
Nice arrangement. I really only have a problem with production on this. And it all has to do with the punk vibe. When the guitar first comes in, in my opinion, it needs to sound nastier - not necessarily more driven or distorted. I mean playing-wise, it should be less precise. (Imagine ME saying THAT! lol) The drums, synthesized I'm sure, should still be more "in your face" and the whole song should be less compressed. Not only that, but the vocals really just need to sound like someone just pissed you off. Other than that, the song itself is very sound.

NaSty leJaa:
I like the vibe of this musically speaking. I like the attitude as well. With this, it's like "f*ck you, I'm taking Sunderland to me," instead of bringing yourself to Sunderland. With that being said, however, this just feels totally out of place. I'm not convinced you have ever been to Sunderland, much less ever been in love in Sunderland. And I do have a BIG problem with the chord interpretation ove the last chorus. The progression here is Dm, F, C, G. And the melody that plays behind the vocals goes to F# over the D chord when it comes back around. No offense, but this is annoying as hell. That F# effectively makes the D a major, BUT you still have a F natural (Dm) going on in your accompaniment part! Now, you could have either changed both parts to F# as to reflect this harmonic change, or you could have taken some cues from people like Hendrix, SRV, and Henry Mancini (composer of Peter Gunn among other things) and used the F natural to make a 7#9 (Hendrix) chord. But with the way it is voiced, it does nothing but sound wrong. Voicing the D as a 7#9 would be way more effective if done something like D, A, F#, C, F with the F natural on top in the melody and the F# and C in the accompanyment part. This is exactly why I've learned to use music theory, not because it "limits" you, but because it gives you tools to communicate ideas with. Sorry this is so harsh, nothing personal.

Paco del Stinko:
Great beginning and riffs. Great "hooks" as well. I have no problems with this whatsoever except that I think it eneded too abruptly. Great synthetic scalar tonality. Good solo that follows it, too! So, did you write it about war too??? lol

shamanizer:
Again, I have no problems with the experimental sound. But I really think this is incomplete. In my opinion, a lot more could have been done with it. It could have some drums kick in with some nice guitar latering. But as it stands, it just sits there in my opinion. Good chord progression, though.

Voices:
I really like the concept behind this. You actually get a vibe going through all of this, too. Bravo. But I just gotta say, this is so "loose" that it takes away from what you are going for. I think had the vocals been more in tune and had it been mixed just a tad more uniformly, it would have been a favorite of mine. The parts of the tune itself are very well arranged, and that gets uber respect from me. But the length (just like my tune "Cakes") could have been shortened. Overall, the song itself is pretty good. The performance and length is about a D in my opinion.

Jon Wilson:
Geeze, dude. Bombs and machine guns starting out? Who the hell do you think you are trying to be? It's certainly heavy and the chorus is catchy, but you gotta remix that bass, homes. It does end with a "bang," gotta give you that, though. lol This is pretty good in my opinion, but I'd never vote for it. Just sayin'.

That's my two centavos.
User avatar
BBABM
Goldman
Posts: 666
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 11:34 pm
Instruments: Guitar, Voice, drums
Recording Method: Session, fruity loops
Submitting as: Bad Boys at Bat Mitzvahs, Fitzroy
Location: Charlottesville, Va

Re: How long will it take to write reviews (via Sunderland)?

Post by BBABM »

jonthecomposer wrote:Bad Boys at Bat Mitzvahs:
This is great. Good concept, too. I would have never thought of "Via Sunderland" as a name, lol. And although the production isn't stellar, it's definitely not hard on the ears. You seem to do so much in so little time. There's a lot to be said for that!
Thank you for the kind words. I'm glad that you don't mind the brevity. My production consists of a mic, and a crappy music editing software that allows me basically nothing to really make it sound professional. This combined with my limited musical ability, and training melds together to form the 50 sec songs you've heard the past few weeks. Basically I try to write punk bluegrass songs, both styles have a lot of movement in a short amount of time, and is something that I enjoy.
Post Reply