
-bill
Me too. And how Hoblit was about 1000 times better with his criticism than that other tosser.BoffoYux wrote:I was thinking of Sammy as well!Billy's Little Trip wrote:I was reading the reviews and thought, cool, Negative Reinforcement! Sammy Kablam would be so proud of you, lol.Hoblit wrote:J U S T K I D D I N G !
Real reviews below!![]()
Yes, the 80s sounding drums are on purpose. Over the years I've become somewhat good at programming different styles of drums. I even break out the real set every once and a while, but I'm extremely limited there. However, this week I specifically programmed the drums just about as simple as I could with the most lame 80s sounding samples I could find.rick.mealey wrote:Bearing in mind that these are MP3s I'm hearing, and that I'm listening on headphones so as not to disturb my roommates, here's a start on the reviews.
Hoblit — Ah, there's the drums. Production-wise I kind of wish the chorus felt louder than the verse, because it's very striking. Wish the verse melody had more shape to it to go with the lyrics, which are the best I've heard thus far.
I'm not sure if you read my previous comments in this thread or not, but you are spot on about the air raid siren guitar. That is exactly what I was going for. I originally had it in the whole chorus but later decided that it was more effective in rejuvenating the chorus, half way through.AJOwens wrote:These reviews were written in fits and starts over several days, and reflect changing moods, and possibly mood-altering substances. YMMV. Hope I don't piss anybody off, but remember, don't take it personally. I'm just some jerk on the Internet.
----
Hoblit - I like the thick, heavy sound. The chorus comes at just the right time, modulates interestingly, accelerates the chord changes, builds well, develops an exciting sound (great air raid siren guitar). Second verse emerges quietly, with the vocal an octave higher (and some minor changes in the guitar, if I'm not mistaken). Gentle outro sums up. In other words, a very well-crafted song. Tune is likeable too. Clean, well-balanced recording. A solid entry.
Are you subtly trying to tell me you don't like my singing? (doubling comment)g_rock wrote: Hoblit- like the guitar sound. Vocals feel right on with mood. like the build. and the bring back. nice octave vocal for increased energy. could double the vocal on the verse. nice back to the quiet verse. I like it.
You are very kind. Ya know, that cymbal advice is so simple yet so huge. I am obviously not a drummer, but I will be incorporating that technique soon as I never thought to do it! During NUR EIN! this summer I was admiring Carlo Bruno's washy ride and saying "how does he do that?" Duh! Thanks for the advice!G_rock wrote: have to say you are consistently my favorite artist here. I cant suggest much to improve cause it is put together very well. If I gotta come up with something; try the edge of the ride with the shoulder of the stick for a crashier sound or for a little variation on the ride. that’s all I got.
Yeah I dont like tea either.EvelBist wrote:grock
Its well done but not my cup of tea. Nirvana didnt float my boat.
Thanks for the kind review. Learning something new everyday in Protools. Glad I traded the looper for Protools.foobar93 wrote:You're dangerous with digital tools. This is great all around. I really love the repeating motif and the bass groove. Vocal parts are great, could be a tad louder, as they get a bit washed out as the track gets louder. Love the contrasting sections. Very menacing vibe. Good separation between the guitar parts, too. Love it, worth a second listen. Hope you'll post lyrics.
What are you talking about? It sounds NOTHING like them. No just kidding, sounds like I taped them off the radio but never heard of them till now. They seem AWESOMEGlennCase wrote:grock: Verse music sounds a lot like a slowed down version of "Is Chicago, Is Not Chicago" by Soul Coughing.
Thanks bro.Paco Del Stinko wrote: I like this a lot, it's one of my faves of the fight. Not perfect, but on target.
Thanks for reviewing everyone that was a shit ton of songs.Hoblit wrote:But after cranking it, this is an excellent tune.
Hey, thanks! I try to keep it interesting, and useful if I can think of anything.Paco Del Stinko wrote:Also, I really dig Mr. Owens review style although they help make me feel dumb(er).
I always start off slowly, but speed up as I approach the finish (.....hello ladies)AJOwens wrote:Hey, thanks! I try to keep it interesting, and useful if I can think of anything.Paco Del Stinko wrote:Also, I really dig Mr. Owens review style although they help make me feel dumb(er).
P.S. Caravan Ray is still chipping away at his Page 1 reviews. I tried an estimated projection based on current rate, but my pencil ran off the end of the graph paper.
Oh, ok. That explains the "hi", and I know the "J$". Is "km" Ken?HeuristicsInc wrote:hij$km - this is us, a new collaboration. i like working with these two.
"the competitors write a brand new song inspired by one of these titles".HeuristicsInc wrote: grock - nice bassline. and that’s a good sounding vocal. i’m not sure you’re getting the idea of the site, if you are calling your song “dead and gone”. it’s supposed to be a song called “art bomb.” i would vote for this if it was art bomb, but as it is i can’t condone this sort of behavior.
yup, that's right.Caravan Ray wrote:Oh, ok. That explains the "hi", and I know the "J$". Is "km" Ken?HeuristicsInc wrote:hij$km - this is us, a new collaboration. i like working with these two.
I figured you'd say that. But I am free to hold you to a higher standard than you would hold yourself. In the end, I get to choose who I vote for and why. But most artists here call their songs what the title is.g_rock wrote: "the competitors write a brand new song inspired by one of these titles".
My song is about a conflicted artist. Thanks for the review.
Actually that would have moved you up one. You are immune to your own venom.Caravan Ray wrote:Very glad that I forgot to vote. Because I would have voted for BSS - dropping me back to third. (Though I probably would have voted for myself too - thus keeping things equal)
Caravan Ray wrote:3. MICHAH SOMMERSMITH: Great lyrics. Good song, good arrangement, good performance. Well done.
foobar93 wrote:Micah Sommersmith
I like the intro. Melancholy and direct. Well mixed, performed, and composed. I have nothing to add except I enjoyed it immensely.
Thanks very much for the kind reviews!g_rock wrote:Micah- nice melody and a pretty good piece.
Thanks! I added some reverb and EQ to the vocals, but I'm also still getting used to new recording equipment and software - so I wasn't intentionally going for a processed sound, but it may have happened by accident.EvelBist wrote:michah
A clever dirge. Were the vocals processed? Sounds like some buzzing going on there. Song is structurally sound.
GlennCase wrote:Micah Sommersmith: The story in the lyrics is oddly intriguing. I'm not wild about the arrangement, but I like the composition. A rare instance where I think the song could be just a big longer, as it feels like it ends too abruptly.
Paco Del Stinko wrote:Micah Sommersmith This is the theme I expected to hear a lot of. I like the musical mood of it, overall, if not all of the lyrics. The ending is kind of abrupt, but the song doesn't overstay its welcome, either.
I expected to get some comments about the abrupt ending and/or the shortness of my song - it's a tendency of mine to go short rather than long - especially if I feel like the song is trying to "make a point" like this one is - I'd rather tell the story briefly and then get out of the way to let the listener think about it than stretch it out or beat them over the head with it. But I can understand that it can be jarring if it's not what you're expecting.HeuristicsInc wrote:micah - i wasn’t sure if i was going to like this at first, but you convinced me. the drums propelled the music nicely. good use of that. um, it ended too quickly. that was abrupt, like you ran out of time to write any more lyrics. still, nice effort.
I can see where you're coming from about the mix. As I said above, I am still getting used to some new recording software, so hopefully I'll be getting better at this.AJOwens wrote:Micah Sommersmith - A very dark take on the title. Well-written lyrics and tune, with a quite musical arrangement. Good performance and recording. Short and wry. My only complaint, and it's a minor one, is that the various instruments seem to be in separate rooms, so to speak; somehow they don't mesh into a unified sound.
Thanks, this is very nice to hear. As for the intro, it's actually two different electric piano patches - the one was really thin in the bass, and the other had an annoying break in the range, right in the middle of the right hand melody. I would have liked to have used one instrument but it didn't work out.Hoblit wrote:Micah Sommersmith
THE LYRICAL CONTENT OF THIS SONG IS EXCELLENT. In fact, I honestly think this is the best take on the title. I really dig this and of course the simplicity of the whole thing is great. I can appreciate mixing the fake drums low but them still being there in order to carry the song from the intro to completion. I'm not crazy about the bass being in the intro with the piano. But that is some weird problem I have with bass guitar & piano only. Thats more on me. But your song is one of the best this week. I have to say that I'm impressed with the simple execution of some of the best lyrics I've heard this week. Excellent work and you are definitley getting my vote.