Telephone Game
- Reist
- Roosevelt
- Posts: 3066
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 2:26 pm
- Instruments: Drums, Guitar
- Recording Method: Yamaha AW1600, Reaper
- Submitting as: Therman
- Location: Calgary
- Contact:
Telephone Game
Has songfight ever had a telephone-game style sidefight? I think that would be kind of cool ... someone could start with a song, then send the tracks to someone else, then they work on it and send it on ... etc etc etc. At the end the song would be pretty strange, but awesome. I don't know how awesome you guys think this is, but I think it sounds kind of interesting.
- Plat
- Attlee
- Posts: 441
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 5:54 pm
- Instruments: teeth and other bones
- Recording Method: cubase, native instruments, waves, izotope, ears
- Submitting as: The Cow Exchange, Eat It 'n' Mattress
- Location: Green Bay, WI
- Contact:
I don't know if anyone's done it already, but I've been interested in participating.
I remember a while back when someone's Web site collected a bunch of sounds from 'fighters based on other random sounds that were submitted. I don't remember the URL or the result of that though.
Are you thinking that the first person in the chain would write a full song, or rather a track or two, or just lyrics (no recording) before passing to the next person?
Also, would the next person in the chain be re-recording parts (essentially covering/reinterpreting and embellishing the previous track), or rather be able to use some subset of the previous source track(s)?
Disclaimer/plea: whatever happens, let's please make the rules clear and in one spot, if/when it's ready to bake.
I remember a while back when someone's Web site collected a bunch of sounds from 'fighters based on other random sounds that were submitted. I don't remember the URL or the result of that though.
Are you thinking that the first person in the chain would write a full song, or rather a track or two, or just lyrics (no recording) before passing to the next person?
Also, would the next person in the chain be re-recording parts (essentially covering/reinterpreting and embellishing the previous track), or rather be able to use some subset of the previous source track(s)?
Disclaimer/plea: whatever happens, let's please make the rules clear and in one spot, if/when it's ready to bake.

- Reist
- Roosevelt
- Posts: 3066
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 2:26 pm
- Instruments: Drums, Guitar
- Recording Method: Yamaha AW1600, Reaper
- Submitting as: Therman
- Location: Calgary
- Contact:
I think we can try and figure out the rules in this thread and change the details of it all as time goes on. I think it would be cool if there was about two sections you do, then you send it on. The next person can't alter the first one, but they can add to the second one and add a section if they like. Then it's sent on, and it continues. They could embellish, and rerecord stuff I guess. Another idea could be that someone could make a full song, then send it to the next person and the next could rerecord their own interpretation of the song - change lyrics, rerecord the whole song, just add tracks or whatever and send it on. I don't know ... what kind of rules were you thinking of?Plat wrote:Are you thinking that the first person in the chain would write a full song, or rather a track or two, or just lyrics (no recording) before passing to the next person?
Also, would the next person in the chain be re-recording parts (essentially covering/reinterpreting and embellishing the previous track), or rather be able to use some subset of the previous source track(s)?
Disclaimer/plea: whatever happens, let's please make the rules clear and in one spot, if/when it's ready to bake.
Re: Telephone Game
http://www.songfight.org/artistpage.php ... _the_tempsjolly roger wrote:Has songfight ever had ... someone ... start with a song, then send the tracks to someone else, then they work on it and send it on ... etc etc etc.
- Reist
- Roosevelt
- Posts: 3066
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 2:26 pm
- Instruments: Drums, Guitar
- Recording Method: Yamaha AW1600, Reaper
- Submitting as: Therman
- Location: Calgary
- Contact:
Re: Telephone Game
If that's the only one, I think it might be worth doing.tviyh wrote:http://www.songfight.org/artistpage.php ... _the_tempsjolly roger wrote:Has songfight ever had ... someone ... start with a song, then send the tracks to someone else, then they work on it and send it on ... etc etc etc.
- Plat
- Attlee
- Posts: 441
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 5:54 pm
- Instruments: teeth and other bones
- Recording Method: cubase, native instruments, waves, izotope, ears
- Submitting as: The Cow Exchange, Eat It 'n' Mattress
- Location: Green Bay, WI
- Contact:
I don't know what I'm thinking
.
If using previous-generation tracks is fair game, we'd probably see less change; the 5th person in line might still hear the 1st-generation guitars. And maybe that's just as fine/interesting, but it's not exactly like the telephone game. In telephone, the message is relayed only by the previous person in the line -- no earlier recordings are played.
Hopefully it won't be required to reuse all previous tracks, if old tracks ARE used at all; just a few generations in, and the mix will get very cluttered (which, yes, I can achieve using only my tracks too
). If tracks are reused at all, I propose setting a limit to this.
It'd be cute, though hard to enforce, to limit how much the previous message could be studied. For example, if you give me a track and I can study it for N days, I can probably cover it reasonably well. But if you only let me listen to it for, say, a half hour -- or just twice -- you can bet I won't catch all the lyrics, or melody, or chord structure, etc, and the next person is going to hear something very different.
Maybe a quick turnaround due-date (i.e. a chain of Songskirmishes) would be a good way to force the spontenaity and give some wiggle room for liberal reinterpretation/lyric-mushing, but the production values on each submission would probably be worse.
I wonder if there's any DRM technology that would (more or less) let us unlock the source file for 30 minutes of study, then prevent playback.
</rambling>

If using previous-generation tracks is fair game, we'd probably see less change; the 5th person in line might still hear the 1st-generation guitars. And maybe that's just as fine/interesting, but it's not exactly like the telephone game. In telephone, the message is relayed only by the previous person in the line -- no earlier recordings are played.
Hopefully it won't be required to reuse all previous tracks, if old tracks ARE used at all; just a few generations in, and the mix will get very cluttered (which, yes, I can achieve using only my tracks too

It'd be cute, though hard to enforce, to limit how much the previous message could be studied. For example, if you give me a track and I can study it for N days, I can probably cover it reasonably well. But if you only let me listen to it for, say, a half hour -- or just twice -- you can bet I won't catch all the lyrics, or melody, or chord structure, etc, and the next person is going to hear something very different.
Maybe a quick turnaround due-date (i.e. a chain of Songskirmishes) would be a good way to force the spontenaity and give some wiggle room for liberal reinterpretation/lyric-mushing, but the production values on each submission would probably be worse.
I wonder if there's any DRM technology that would (more or less) let us unlock the source file for 30 minutes of study, then prevent playback.
</rambling>
Last edited by Plat on Sat Apr 22, 2006 11:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Ibárruri
- Posts: 5374
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:33 am
- Instruments: Bass, keyboards, singin', guitar
- Submitting as: Johnny Cashpoint
- Location: London, Engerllaaannnddd
- Contact:
It ws Fluffy's 'Project' I think part one got finished, but he wasn't that happy with the outcome of Part Two, and didn't finish it.Plat wrote: I remember a while back when someone's Web site collected a bunch of sounds from 'fighters based on other random sounds that were submitted. I don't remember the URL or the result of that though.
http://beesbuzz.biz/music/project/two.phpj$ wrote:I think ... he wasn't that happy with the outcome of Part Two, and didn't finish it.
- Plat
- Attlee
- Posts: 441
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 5:54 pm
- Instruments: teeth and other bones
- Recording Method: cubase, native instruments, waves, izotope, ears
- Submitting as: The Cow Exchange, Eat It 'n' Mattress
- Location: Green Bay, WI
- Contact:
Yes! This is what I was thinking of. Thanks to you both.tviyh wrote:http://beesbuzz.biz/music/project/two.php
- Niveous
- Ibárruri
- Posts: 7273
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 6:45 am
- Instruments: vocals, songwriting, guitar
- Submitting as: Lucky Witch and the Righteous Ghost
- Pronouns: He/him
- Location: Staten Island, NY
- Contact:
I believe that was the aforementioned W2 and the Temps. I think you played on "I Want To Get Better" (which I would link to if I could find online....or my CD of the song)feldspar wrote:We did something like this a long time ago. I think JoS organized it? I don't remember. But I played the harmonica. It was cool.
"I'd like to see 1984 redubbed with this in the soundtrack."- Furrypedro.
NUR EIN!
X-Tokyo
Lucky Witch and the Righteous Ghost
NUR EIN!
X-Tokyo
Lucky Witch and the Righteous Ghost
- jack
- Roosevelt
- Posts: 3854
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:41 am
- Recording Method: ProTools, Logic, Garageband
- Submitting as: brody, Jack Shite, Johnny in the Corner, Bloody Hams, lots more
- Location: santa cruz, ca.
w2 and the temps was a JoS inspired bit where i think jim split up the responsibilities, and the track was passed around in a particular order within one weeks time. someone wrote the lyrics, someone wrote the arrangement, each instrument was someone different, etc. i played bass. i remember roy castle sang it, and motherfunker played guitar i think. and jim played on it. i can't remember who else. "lizard wizard". i thought it came out pretty good all things considered.
- Niveous
- Ibárruri
- Posts: 7273
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 6:45 am
- Instruments: vocals, songwriting, guitar
- Submitting as: Lucky Witch and the Righteous Ghost
- Pronouns: He/him
- Location: Staten Island, NY
- Contact:
I really dug "I want to get better". Jon Eric helped on that. So did Jute Gyte and Humbert.
"I'd like to see 1984 redubbed with this in the soundtrack."- Furrypedro.
NUR EIN!
X-Tokyo
Lucky Witch and the Righteous Ghost
NUR EIN!
X-Tokyo
Lucky Witch and the Righteous Ghost
- Reist
- Roosevelt
- Posts: 3066
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 2:26 pm
- Instruments: Drums, Guitar
- Recording Method: Yamaha AW1600, Reaper
- Submitting as: Therman
- Location: Calgary
- Contact:
If anyone wants to actually do this, then just post a reply saying you call this round. I figure I might as well get this thing rolling and anyone that wants to do this can jump on board. Here's the rules.
1. Song is posted
2. Random person posts on the board that they call this round, then they cover the song that is posted, changing any things they dislike (music and lyrics), adding sections, and overall making their own version of the song. Original tracks can be used but don't have to be.
3. New version song is posted.
4. The next person claims the round, etc etc. Things go on as long as we want them to, but once you've done it, you can't do it again.
I just did a cover of a Rone song, and since it wasn't a hxaro, I figured we could use it.
Here's the first song. Whoever claims it first covers it. If you want to do it, call it quick.
1. Song is posted
2. Random person posts on the board that they call this round, then they cover the song that is posted, changing any things they dislike (music and lyrics), adding sections, and overall making their own version of the song. Original tracks can be used but don't have to be.
3. New version song is posted.
4. The next person claims the round, etc etc. Things go on as long as we want them to, but once you've done it, you can't do it again.
I just did a cover of a Rone song, and since it wasn't a hxaro, I figured we could use it.
Here's the first song. Whoever claims it first covers it. If you want to do it, call it quick.
- Jim of Seattle
- Niemöller
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:33 am
- Instruments: Keyboards
- Recording Method: Cakewalk, EastWest Play, Adobe Audition, Windows
- Submitting as: Jim of Seattle, Ants (Invisible), Madi Singer/Songwriter, Restless Events
- Contact:
Yeah, it was an interesting experiment. But not one I'd be interested in doing again.
Here's my record label page thingie with stuff about me if you are so interested: https://greenmonkeyrecords.com/jim-of-seattle/
- the idiot king
- Attlee
- Posts: 416
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 1:28 pm
- Instruments: Guitar, Bass, Keys, Programming, Drums, Percussion
- Recording Method: Logic Pro 11, Arturia Audiofuse 16Rig
- Submitting as: The Idiot Kings
- Pronouns: He/Him
- Location: Peabody, MA USA
- Contact:
count me in.
“It’s amazing how quickly we get used to weirdness when it’s our own weirdness.”
-Scott Meyer
The Difference Engine | Passive Witnesses | Ochmoneks
-Scott Meyer
The Difference Engine | Passive Witnesses | Ochmoneks
- Treachjuris
- de Gaulle
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:43 am
- Instruments: piano, guitar (acoustic/lectrc), violin (acoustic/lectrc) clarinet; whatever generates sound
- Recording Method: ibanez, rhodes, tascam, m-audio, darla, cubase, magix, noteworthy, mixcraft
- Submitting as: Fish Sausage, Scrotean Hydra, Yummy Bug
- Location: Detroit, MI
- Contact: