I'm trying to like the new Beatles album

Talk about how awesome the new _______ album is.
User avatar
fluffy
Eisenhower
Posts: 11196
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:56 am
Instruments: sometimes
Recording Method: Logic Pro X
Submitting as: Sockpuppet
Pronouns: she/they
Location: Seattle-ish
Contact:

I'm trying to like the new Beatles album

Post by fluffy »

Love is a great idea, and there are some truly great moments in it, but there are also some truly crappy problems with it.
  • The first half has a distinct lack of dynamic range
  • They overuse a few atmospheric sound effects (at least on the 5.1 DTS master, I don't know about the other masters, and actually I expect the 2.0 stereo master to be <em>better</em> in light of this)
  • The transitions between some of the songs are a bit too abrupt and forced
  • Some truly annoying reverb treatments (like the plate reverbs at the beginning of Strawberry Fields)
  • Sometimes they change the pitch of one song just to force it to fit with another (like Blackbird shoehorned into Yesterday)
But there's some truly brilliant moments too. Unfortunately, they make the brilliant moments last too long and kind of run them into the ground.

On the whole I think it's pretty good as a mashup, though I don't think it's really worth the $20 or the hype. Hank Handy did a <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2004/12/29/in ... html">much more impressive job</a>.

On the other hand, now I'm actually interested in getting Let It Be Naked, which is the completely opposite approach to revitalizing Beatles masters, and which I've heard many good things about.

Incidentally and somewhat related, I actually am VERY much digging Sean Lennon's latest album. It's very Elliot Smith meets Death Cab For Cutie with a great helping of what made his dad's band so great (though really I hear more of a McCartney influence in his music).
User avatar
Adam!
Niemöller
Posts: 1431
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:10 am
Instruments: Drum 'n' Bass (but not THAT Drum 'n' Bass)
Recording Method: Reaper + Stock Plugins
Submitting as: Max Bombast
Pronouns: he/him
Location: Victoria, BC, AwesomeLand
Contact:

Post by Adam! »

The dynamic range restriction is a huge problem for me. This A Day In The Life makes me sad, just because of the butchered crescendos.

As for the album on a whole, I still haven't listened to it enough to make up my mind.
j$
Ibárruri
Posts: 5374
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:33 am
Instruments: Bass, keyboards, singin', guitar
Submitting as: Johnny Cashpoint
Location: London, Engerllaaannnddd
Contact:

Post by j$ »

It's the Beatles - half of them are dead. Let the fuckers sleep, circus freaks.
User avatar
Märk
Churchill
Posts: 2048
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 8:35 pm
Instruments: Guitar, bass
Recording Method: Presonus Audiobox 44VSL, Cubase
Submitting as: ROTR, svenmullet, I forget what else
Pronouns: master
Location: Canada

Post by Märk »

j$ wrote:It's the Beatles - half of them are dead. Let the fuckers sleep, circus freaks.
I'm pretty sure Paul is at least brain-dead too.
* this is not a disclaimer
User avatar
fluffy
Eisenhower
Posts: 11196
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:56 am
Instruments: sometimes
Recording Method: Logic Pro X
Submitting as: Sockpuppet
Pronouns: she/they
Location: Seattle-ish
Contact:

Post by fluffy »

None of the original Beatles had anything to do with this project, except that permission was granted by their various estates and George Martin pointed his son in the right direction (though apparently not well enough).
User avatar
mkilly
Niemöller
Posts: 1227
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 10:22 am
Instruments: guitar
Location: Austin, Texas
Contact:

Post by mkilly »

George Martin and his son worked on it together, in fact. Here's an EW interview:
http://www.ew.com/ew/report/0,6115,1562172_4_0_,00.html
"It is really true what philosophy tells us, that life must be understood backwards. But with this, one forgets the second proposition, that it must be lived forwards." Søren Kierkegaard
User avatar
fluffy
Eisenhower
Posts: 11196
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:56 am
Instruments: sometimes
Recording Method: Logic Pro X
Submitting as: Sockpuppet
Pronouns: she/they
Location: Seattle-ish
Contact:

Post by fluffy »

That's how it's marketed but what I'd heard was it was the son who did most of the work. I guess that interview says otherwise though. Also, George Martin has been going progressively deaf for many years and I guess this wasn't really done as an album but as a soundtrack and those would all come together (heh) to explain the lack of dynamic range.

I should listen to the stereo mix though. It sounds like Giles put more work into it, and really the 5.1 mix seemed very gimmicky, so the stereo mix might turn out to be much better.
WeaselSlayer
Niemöller
Posts: 1592
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 5:13 pm
Instruments: Guitar, keyboard
Recording Method: Garageband, laptop mic
Submitting as: Luke Henley
Location: Tucson, AZ
Contact:

Post by WeaselSlayer »

Hahaha, I thought this was a joke and was like "Wow, a lot of people are playing along with this." And now I know what's what. Wow.
User avatar
fluffy
Eisenhower
Posts: 11196
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:56 am
Instruments: sometimes
Recording Method: Logic Pro X
Submitting as: Sockpuppet
Pronouns: she/they
Location: Seattle-ish
Contact:

Post by fluffy »

The stereo mix is MUCH better.
deshead
Orwell
Posts: 875
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 2:44 am
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Post by deshead »

User avatar
Jim of Seattle
Niemöller
Posts: 1361
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:33 am
Instruments: Keyboards
Recording Method: Cakewalk, EastWest Play, Adobe Audition, Windows
Submitting as: Jim of Seattle, Ants (Invisible), Madi Singer/Songwriter, Restless Events
Contact:

Post by Jim of Seattle »

I was very prepared to get mad at this CD, in kind of a "how dare they" way, but I gotta say, it's damn cool. My favorite bits are where they didn't touch the song much at all but just re-mixed the original tracks. It's like hearing the song anew again. The Guitar Gently Weeps strings are cool because they're so George Martin-y sounding, and the backwards Sun King is a minor revelation. Fluffy, I see what you mean about the key changing, but it didn't bother me. Strawberry Fields sounds like it was from a demo recording that was performed in another key anyway, and they just took the final version's tracks and transposed them. I ain't got a problem with that.

Also, they were making their own comments on the music just by virtue of the songs they chose to combine. For example by putting all that stuff at the end of Strawberry Fields they were saying "All these songs kind of did the same thing - here's montage of all the times they did this sort of thing". And I found it fun to make those connections. They did that a few times.

I found the opening "Because" kind of boring, as I did when I heard it in the Anthology ten years ago. I don't know, they sound great and all, but it doesn't feel like a whole song without the keyboard. And I always miss the opening chords to You Never Give Me Your Money right after.

But yeah, super duper.
Here's my record label page thingie with stuff about me if you are so interested: https://greenmonkeyrecords.com/jim-of-seattle/
User avatar
Spud
Roosevelt
Posts: 4781
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:25 am
Instruments: Bass, Keyboards, eHorn
Submitting as: Octothorpe
Pronouns: he/him
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Post by Spud »

Hey Jim. Your domain is dead.
"I only listen to good music. And Octothorpe." - Marcus Kellis
Song Fight! The Rockening
User avatar
fluffy
Eisenhower
Posts: 11196
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:56 am
Instruments: sometimes
Recording Method: Logic Pro X
Submitting as: Sockpuppet
Pronouns: she/they
Location: Seattle-ish
Contact:

Post by fluffy »

You mean he's NOT trying to help me meet up with Seattle singles and get info on Washington casinos? :(
User avatar
Jim of Seattle
Niemöller
Posts: 1361
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:33 am
Instruments: Keyboards
Recording Method: Cakewalk, EastWest Play, Adobe Audition, Windows
Submitting as: Jim of Seattle, Ants (Invisible), Madi Singer/Songwriter, Restless Events
Contact:

Post by Jim of Seattle »

Spud wrote:Hey Jim. Your domain is dead.
Thanks. But God how I know it. Trying to get these domain registration people to do a simple thing is like... well, like something that's really hard to do.
Here's my record label page thingie with stuff about me if you are so interested: https://greenmonkeyrecords.com/jim-of-seattle/
User avatar
fluffy
Eisenhower
Posts: 11196
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:56 am
Instruments: sometimes
Recording Method: Logic Pro X
Submitting as: Sockpuppet
Pronouns: she/they
Location: Seattle-ish
Contact:

Post by fluffy »

It looks like it's still registered to you, so why can't you just log in to the registrar and update your nameserver settings? Or did a squatter decide to usurp your contact info too?
User avatar
Jim of Seattle
Niemöller
Posts: 1361
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:33 am
Instruments: Keyboards
Recording Method: Cakewalk, EastWest Play, Adobe Audition, Windows
Submitting as: Jim of Seattle, Ants (Invisible), Madi Singer/Songwriter, Restless Events
Contact:

Post by Jim of Seattle »

They said the transfer was successful, they just needed 2-3 days to get some server or other updated. Is there something I can do? I know very little about this stuff. My ISP told me it should just start working as soon as they get it together.
Here's my record label page thingie with stuff about me if you are so interested: https://greenmonkeyrecords.com/jim-of-seattle/
User avatar
fluffy
Eisenhower
Posts: 11196
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:56 am
Instruments: sometimes
Recording Method: Logic Pro X
Submitting as: Sockpuppet
Pronouns: she/they
Location: Seattle-ish
Contact:

Post by fluffy »

And how long has it been? It does take 2-3 days to finish domain transfers between registrars.
User avatar
Jim of Seattle
Niemöller
Posts: 1361
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:33 am
Instruments: Keyboards
Recording Method: Cakewalk, EastWest Play, Adobe Audition, Windows
Submitting as: Jim of Seattle, Ants (Invisible), Madi Singer/Songwriter, Restless Events
Contact:

Post by Jim of Seattle »

Longer. Like a week or so.
Here's my record label page thingie with stuff about me if you are so interested: https://greenmonkeyrecords.com/jim-of-seattle/
User avatar
fluffy
Eisenhower
Posts: 11196
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:56 am
Instruments: sometimes
Recording Method: Logic Pro X
Submitting as: Sockpuppet
Pronouns: she/they
Location: Seattle-ish
Contact:

Post by fluffy »

It looks like the nameserver settings have gotten updated sometime since last night, so give it a day to propagate. It's working for me at work now, for example.
User avatar
Jim of Seattle
Niemöller
Posts: 1361
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:33 am
Instruments: Keyboards
Recording Method: Cakewalk, EastWest Play, Adobe Audition, Windows
Submitting as: Jim of Seattle, Ants (Invisible), Madi Singer/Songwriter, Restless Events
Contact:

Post by Jim of Seattle »

Oh really? Cool. Apparently it was the name server thing that was messed up. I hear it should all be up in a day or so. Just in time for hosting my GoM entry.
Here's my record label page thingie with stuff about me if you are so interested: https://greenmonkeyrecords.com/jim-of-seattle/
HeuristicsInc
Ibárruri
Posts: 5350
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 6:14 pm
Instruments: Synths
Recording Method: Windows computer, Acid, Synths etc.
Submitting as: Heuristics Inc. (duh) + collabs
Pronouns: he/him
Location: Maryland USA
Contact:

Post by HeuristicsInc »

So my aunt got me some stuff from what she thought was my wishlist at amazon, but it turned out to be somebody else's. they did want an interesting collection of stuff, since two of the four i already had, the other i might have bought, and only one was uninteresting. the one i might have bought was this album, and i decided to keep it and return the others to amazon. listened to it today. i think it's pretty interesting. it won't replace the original albums for me, obviously, but it's a nice alternate listen.
-bill
152612141617123326211316121416172329292119162316331829382412351416132117152332252921
http://heuristicsinc.com
Liner Notes
SF Lyric Ideas
Thornberry
Karski
Posts: 96
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:36 am
Instruments: Piano, Guitar, Bass, Drums, Recorder,, Vocals, Haromica
Recording Method: M-Powered Pro Tools 8 via Profire 2626
Submitting as: Thornberry
Location: San Diego, CA
Contact:

Post by Thornberry »

I know I am pretty darn late to this disscussion, but I dont check these parts of the boards very often.

I thought this album was fantastic personally! I knew the song were great (everyone did for 40 years now), so I was in this not only for that but very interested in the production decisions made.

When you have access to EVERY BEATLE master tape, there are litereally millions of production decisions, so there were times when I was listening for the first time, and I was making my own guesses as what would come next. And I have to say there were times I thought mine woulda been better (ha lil ol me), but I guess that is what happens when there is so much creative processes involved.

But hearing the remastered version alone was worth the price of the CD. I liked how they pitch shifted blackbird from the original G to the F that yesterday is in. I loved the Being for the benefiet of mr kite/Shes so heavy/Helter Skelter.

But I think who shines on this album more than anyone was George. He truly came through in such crystal clear ways that he was so underrated. his voice was awesome on this record.

There were a few song I didnt like so much. I understand a lot of this goes with the fact that is a soundtrack, not just an album. But I thought the including of Help!, Revolution, and back in the USSR, where pointless to the record. They sounded better quality-wise, but nothing different at all.

I dunno, I LOVEd it (hehe)
Post Reply