Gain Staging in the Digital Domains

Ask questions and get answers about how to make music in any particular way. Hardware or songwriting or whatever.
Post Reply
User avatar
ken
Roosevelt
Posts: 3918
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 6:10 pm
Instruments: Guitar, bass, drums, keys
Recording Method: Audient Sono, MOTU 828x, Cubase
Submitting as: Ken's Super Duper Band 'n Stuff
Pronouns: he/him
Location: oakland, ca
Contact:

Gain Staging in the Digital Domains

Post by ken »

Some tips from an article in Electronic Musician:

1. Record signals to peak at no higher than -6 dB on the meters.

2. Start you mix with your faders set to an average position of half to two-thirds of the fader level.

3. Use groups. Once you've gotten a good balance of elements within a group, using a group master won't mess with that balance.

4. Use master faders in your sessions. When a master-fader meter clips, simply lower the fader until the clipping stops.

5. Watch out for clipping in plug-ins. Lower the plug-in's input level if necessary.

6. If a track-level fader is inconveniently high or low, insert a gain plug-in to adjust the level.
Ken's Super Duper Band 'n Stuff - Berkeley Social Scene - Tiny Robots - Seamus Collective - Semolina Pilchards - Cutie Pies - Explino! - Bravo Bros. - 2 from 14 - and more!

i would just like to remind everyone that Ken eats kittens - blue lang
User avatar
Mostess
Orwell
Posts: 806
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 5:49 am
Instruments: Vocal, guitar, keyboard, clarinet
Recording Method: Ardour 5, JACK, Ubuntu
Submitting as: Hostess Mostess
Pronouns: He/him
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

Post by Mostess »

I came to Help and How To to start a new thread asking for help with levels. And lo and behold! Thanks ken.

The 5+ year history of Hostess Mostess is sprinkled with periods of retreat followed by bursts of submissions. We're using our current retreat to reflect on why all our post-digital recordings are so overcompressed, and how to let our sound breathe a little more.

Our Oversleeping entry was an experiment in not using any compression at all. Except on the vocals (it's like an addiction!). Even then, I think I panicked and ran a softknee on the final mix to get the RMS higher. The result is just messy and weak sounding. I have a compression problem.

I feel like the solution lies in getting better recordings and maybe better speakers for mixing. I'll take these points to heart and work more with levels instead of inserting compressors everywhere.
"We don’t write songs about our own largely dull lives. We mostly rely on the time-tested gimmick of making shit up."
-John Linnell
jimtyrrell
Churchill
Posts: 2263
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 12:43 pm
Instruments: Guitar/bass/keys
Recording Method: Various. Mostly Garageband these days, actually.
Submitting as: Jim Tyrrell
Location: New Hampshire
Contact:

Post by jimtyrrell »

I've been following most of these points, but #3 is of particular interest to me. I don't think my setup has the capacity to 'group' tracks, but I could always bounce them to an open track once I'm satisfied with their sound. I'm looking forward to putting this method to test.
User avatar
Reist
Roosevelt
Posts: 3066
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 2:26 pm
Instruments: Drums, Guitar
Recording Method: Yamaha AW1600, Reaper
Submitting as: Therman
Location: Calgary
Contact:

Post by Reist »

That's cool. There's too much compression in this world. I still like using it in moderation (mostly to get the typical snare sound that everyone wants), but this could help a lot.
User avatar
Billy's Little Trip
Odie
Posts: 12090
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 2:56 pm
Instruments: Guitar, Bass, Vocals, Drums, Skin Flute
Recording Method: analog to digital via Presonus FireBox, Cubase and a porn machine
Submitting as: Billy's Little Trip, Billy and the Psychotics
Location: Cali fucking ornia

Post by Billy's Little Trip »

Like Jim, #3 caught my eye also. I have been doing something similar if I understand it right. I have gotten to where I don't like touching the fader of a track once I found the sweet spot. BUT, as the song builds, say, 34 tracks later, I'm forced to start changing the first 10 track levels that were perfect together, so I just link the 10 tracks so that I move them together. I will quite often have groups of 8 to 12 tracks so that I only move 3 or 4 faders. Then when everything is recorded the way I like it, I unlock all the groups and regroup by instruments, then export them as wave files, IE: Drums = kick, snare, hat, toms, over head mics, room mics and separate crashes. Just the drums can be as many as 7 tracks, so it's nice to bounce them to one stereo track. Then I will export 1 or 2 copies of the snare and kick that will get EQd to bring out the sounds I like in each. Nothing worse than a song with the drums buried by the rest of the tracks.
My files are:
#1. Recording tracks = 32 to 34 tracks average
which are bounced down to:
#2. Mixing tracks = 10 to 12 tracks average
which again are grouped into instrumental tracks, vocal tracks, including back ups and ahhhs/ohhhs, lead guitar tracks and sound FX if there are any.
User avatar
Billy's Little Trip
Odie
Posts: 12090
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 2:56 pm
Instruments: Guitar, Bass, Vocals, Drums, Skin Flute
Recording Method: analog to digital via Presonus FireBox, Cubase and a porn machine
Submitting as: Billy's Little Trip, Billy and the Psychotics
Location: Cali fucking ornia

Post by Billy's Little Trip »

Also, 5. Watch out for clipping in plug-ins. Lower the plug-in's input level if necessary.
This is something that I've just started to notice. In the past I thought I peaked the meter while recording and Id rerecord the part. Then one day after rerecording a part about three times and lowering my levels each time, I noticed I was not peaking on the recording, so I dug deeper and found it was a VST plug. I can not count how many times I have rerecorded parts that may have just been my plug in peaking.
User avatar
fluffy
Eisenhower
Posts: 11202
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:56 am
Instruments: sometimes
Recording Method: Logic Pro X
Submitting as: Sockpuppet
Pronouns: she/they
Location: Seattle-ish
Contact:

Post by fluffy »

#3 is something I keep meaning to try.

Many audio environments refer to them as "buses" rather than "groups," in case that's what's throwing people off. (Okay, technically buses and groups are different things but that's how you do group-mixing functionality in Logic or Cubase or whatever. Once you find a good mix within a group of tracks, you change their output to a particular bus, and from then on you can just change the mixing of the bus.)
User avatar
Billy's Little Trip
Odie
Posts: 12090
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 2:56 pm
Instruments: Guitar, Bass, Vocals, Drums, Skin Flute
Recording Method: analog to digital via Presonus FireBox, Cubase and a porn machine
Submitting as: Billy's Little Trip, Billy and the Psychotics
Location: Cali fucking ornia

Post by Billy's Little Trip »

I'm embarrassed to say, I still haven't taken the time to figure out how to use the buses. I'm sure when the need is there, I will. It's just as easy to just link the track once I get the levels the way I like them. But then again, I won't truly know what's easier until I start using buses.

Right know my over all concern is keeping my separation of the instruments in the final production. My wonderful little tid bits seem to be getting blended with other parts so much that the dynamics of the songs are being lost a bit.
So that's my next big step in the studio recording/mixing process.
Post Reply