Page 4 of 5

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:17 am
by Phillip Wilcher
Billy's Little Trip wrote:When I get in the zone, I've been told that I look empty or gone. The time thing, totally! And yes, it takes me a few to get back.

I may never meet the needs of its moment,
prolonged dysphoria,
physical decline.
Youth delays with time aplenty to spare,
time to trust.
Every abstraction is of itself immortal,
imperishable....
I am immortal only when misunderstood.
Free of form, carve a form to corrode another:
anatomize its embryo,
cut, divide and isolate.
Disinfect and freeze it.
Like sand struck by lightning,
its solidification is an exaggeration of character,
a crystal region and curiosity defining ecstacy
where each engenders the other until ends fuse
to erase the boundaries of time
and flesh becomes word.

(PW)

Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:54 pm
by Billy's Little Trip
I must have missed this last post. You certainly are a poet Phillip. :wink:

Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:59 pm
by Niveous
Okay, PW. This has been a pretty elaborate introduction. Question is- are you going to jump into the fight?

Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 2:49 pm
by Phillip Wilcher
Billy's Little Trip wrote:I must have missed this last post. You certainly are a poet Phillip. :wink:
Thanks BLT, but I'm not really a poet - maybe I just pretend to be. Everything said here is pretty much after the fact - and once you verbalize something it changes. Creating is the thing. I'm enjoying the interaction here. How's your songwriting? I've been reworking some pieces for flute, cello and piano.....

Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 3:05 pm
by Phillip Wilcher
Niveous wrote:Okay, PW. This has been a pretty elaborate introduction. Question is- are you going to jump into the fight?
Hi Niveous,

Originally I was searching the web for art song forums and Song Fight came up. I posted my introduction with my website address without really knowing what Song Fight was. I tend just to write music for myself and then let it go to live a life of its own, hopefully. I'm totally out of my era - I sit at a piano with a blank sheet of manuscript paper and pencil and hope for the best, mostly. I don't even own any recording devices! But I'm bowled over that something so positive as Song Fight exists out there for creative folk - it must be wonderfully motivating. So no, I doubt I'll enter the arena. But I would like to stay in touch - if that's OK - I like the interaction and creative kindred spirit. It's nice to contribute in some way.... and I'm ever curious about what motivates people and how they do what they do.....cheers!

Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 3:07 pm
by Phillip Wilcher
Billy's Little Trip wrote:I must have missed this last post. You certainly are a poet Phillip. :wink:
Maybe it's all a variation on a theme and the theme is .....

Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 9:54 pm
by erik
Weed?

Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:25 pm
by Phillip Wilcher
erik wrote:Weed?
Cute!! The photo I mean! Cheers Eric.....

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:27 am
by spinlock
Your poem is really interesting and powerful. I like the contrasts between beauty and decay, creation and entropy. I was trying to imagine how music for it would sound, and I think it would be beyond my skills to create something musically that would reflect the magnitude of the words effectively. I hear snatches, for a few words or a phrase, but the following lines require a different mood.

However, I disagree with the premise that abstractions are immortal.
What is beauty if no-one is around to see it? What is emotion if nothing is left that can feel it. What is truth if there are no facts? Justice if there is no right or wrong? How can we define emptiness if everything is a void?
Abstractions allow us to deal with groups of things, and if none of those things exist, then they cannot be abstracted.

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:43 am
by Phillip Wilcher
Phillip Wilcher wrote:
erik wrote:Weed?
Cute!! The photo I mean! Cheers Eric.....
Hey Eric - you changed the photo!

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:55 am
by Phillip Wilcher
spinlock wrote:Your poem is really interesting and powerful. I like the contrasts between beauty and decay, creation and entropy. I was trying to imagine how music for it would sound, and I think it would be beyond my skills to create something musically that would reflect the magnitude of the words effectively. I hear snatches, for a few words or a phrase, but the following lines require a different mood.

However, I disagree with the premise that abstractions are immortal.
What is beauty if no-one is around to see it? What is emotion if nothing is left that can feel it. What is truth if there are no facts? Justice if there is no right or wrong? How can we define emptiness if everything is a void?
Abstractions allow us to deal with groups of things, and if none of those things exist, then they cannot be abstracted.
Thank you Spinlock for responding to my post. It's sometime since I've been here. I actually used the poem in a setting for spoken voice with cello and piano. The French have a term "depouillement" which literally means to strip away to what is essential - to the essence - and perhaps it is that that which we cannot see is eternal - truth and beauty, it has been said, belong as complements, for one exists for the wise and the other for the susceptible heart. Perhaps it all has to do with being part of some bigger picture. Every abstraction of itself........but as powerful as my poem maybe, it's also a tad clever, and that, like cleverness in all Art is perhaps its weakness.............[/b]

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:20 am
by spinlock
I don't suppose you have a recording of that available? I would be very interested to hear your musical interpretation of the words.
The idea of there being a pure essence of something, reminds me of platonic idealism - although there it is argued that everything that exists here is merely a flawed instantiation of a perfect ideal version of that object that exists in our imaginations but cannot be in this imperfect world.

Why do you see cleverness as a weakness? Perhaps because it can be challenged and reasoned with, and so distracts from the emotion and expression of the art? But without cleverness, in the composition and in the reader, the art could not be so concisely expressed, and would lose a great deal of its power.

In any case, thank you very much for posting here, I have found the discussion you have created to be very thought provoking.

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:23 am
by Billy's Little Trip
Hey Phillip, nice to see you still stop by. :wink:

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:25 pm
by Phillip Wilcher
Billy's Little Trip wrote:Hey Phillip, nice to see you still stop by. :wink:
Hey there BLT - I've wondered about you from time to time (and everyone) and how you are going with your songwriting........glad to hear from you.

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:57 pm
by Phillip Wilcher
spinlock wrote:I don't suppose you have a recording of that available? I would be very interested to hear your musical interpretation of the words.
The idea of there being a pure essence of something, reminds me of platonic idealism - although there it is argued that everything that exists here is merely a flawed instantiation of a perfect ideal version of that object that exists in our imaginations but cannot be in this imperfect world.

Why do you see cleverness as a weakness? Perhaps because it can be challenged and reasoned with, and so distracts from the emotion and expression of the art? But without cleverness, in the composition and in the reader, the art could not be so concisely expressed, and would lose a great deal of its power.

In any case, thank you very much for posting here, I have found the discussion you have created to be very thought provoking.

Thank you for sharing further thoughts with me...... and to everyone who does......
I'm afraid there's no recording, although the score is availbale from AMC. If you'd care to email me through my website (http://www.phillipwilcher.com) a postal address, I can look into having one sent you. My pleasure. I'm presently reading a fascinating book by Peter Kivy titled "The Possessor And The Possessed" - it's underlying thread seems to be the idea that "genius" (whatever that is) is either as Longinus viewed it, something you can possess, or Platonic - something that "happens" to you. It's a comparative look, I suppose, between Handel (Longinusian, I think or a combination of both), Mozart (Platonic) and Beethoven (Longinusian) etc etc.....

"A flawed instantiation of a perfect ideal" ?? I wonder what perfection is? What about that almost fatal flaw - that very thing that more often than not gives to something its perfection. Beauty, after all , limps. I can learn more about a piece of music through a flawed performance than one hammered to perfection, most definitely, I'd say......but then, if we achieved perfection, why would there be a need to go on. For myself, I've always struggled (now and then) with the the fact that I can't be my work and perhaps that is how it is for all of us. Way leads on to way - we keep chipping away at what we do never to actually outdo what we will come to do. That's the absolute joy of it though - that we always have something to look forward to, as frustrating as it can sometimes be, but how good is that!

From T S Elliot:

We shall not cease from exploration
And the end of all our exploring
will be to arrive where we started
And know the place for the first time.

A while ago I shared some thoughts with my friend "Billy's Little Trip" about plateauing. Delacroix said something similar to T S Elliot - although he was writing in his journal about revolution - that everything must return to its natural point of departure in order to progress. Over time I have come to realize this and it helps my "process" of creativity. It helps to be able to recognize it......

Why do I think cleverness is a weakness? Perhaps not entirely, but sometimes I feel it covers up for a lack of natural ability - that phenomenon Plato believed "happens" to you - and getting back to Peter Kivy's brainy book - perhaps cleverness is part of the Longinusian idea - if an idea fails you, get out your building blocks. I'm probably not making much sense here, but when the idea of a thing and the thing itself happens simultaneously, you strike gold. You can also pan for that gold, if you are clever enough, but then the trick is to make that gold sound innate and spontaneous. Cleverness can also be a disguise, I daresay, and although it's definitely a part of craftsmanship, so too it can simply be just "click" to impress. I like sincerity, and most certainly truth in all things. I would rather something be well crafted than clever. I see cleverness as being perhaps a tad superficial or overly calculated - but this is just an interpretation and my thoughts only. I think cleverness becomes a weakness when it's used as a gimmick. But then, gimmicky things have their place too. Still, all this comes after the fact......

I'm touched you have thanked me for posting. It's lovely to share thoughts with people and it's been lovely to spend some time in thought with you.

It's great to touch base with everyone again!

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 2:51 am
by Phillip Wilcher
erik wrote:Weed?
Either I've been watching too much Buffy or you're gettin' spooky kid!

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 6:12 pm
by jb
weirdest. troll. ever.

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 6:39 pm
by anti-m
jb wrote:weirdest. troll. ever.
Oh man, I'm so glad I was not alone in this sentiment. I was feeling like biggest curmudgeon ever.

No offense, Phil, you seem like a very nice guy. I'm pretty weird myself.

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 7:26 pm
by Billy's Little Trip
Both of you are curmudgeons. :P

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:14 pm
by Phillip Wilcher
Billy's Little Trip wrote:Both of you are curmudgeons. :P
What's a curmudgeon??

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:38 pm
by Phillip Wilcher
anti-m wrote:
jb wrote:weirdest. troll. ever.
Oh man, I'm so glad I was not alone in this sentiment. I was feeling like biggest curmudgeon ever.

No offense, Phil, you seem like a very nice guy. I'm pretty weird myself.
I just looked up "curmudgeon" - a churlish and miserly fellow. But then I had to look up "churlish"....... I was kind of hoping a curmudgeon was something fluffy and cute a la Buffy! Oh well.......cheers for now :D

Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 4:40 am
by Phillip Wilcher
anti-m wrote:
jb wrote:weirdest. troll. ever.
Oh man, I'm so glad I was not alone in this sentiment. I was feeling like biggest curmudgeon ever.

No offense, Phil, you seem like a very nice guy. I'm pretty weird myself.
Just keep on peddling - that's all you've got to do - you'll get there! :D