Page 4 of 4

Re: Frenzies Live On!!

Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 9:42 am
by JonPorobil
Indeed. But let's say, for the sake of argument, that Reist would prefer to divert all that traffic to his own website. That's a somewhat understandable goal.

"Get to You" had two participants and one vote. Short of bringing the Frenzies to the Songfight forum, how could Reist increase participation and votes?

Re: Frenzies Live On!!

Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:54 am
by ujnhunter
Sex.

Re: Frenzies Live On!!

Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 11:29 am
by Eric Y.
Cash or other valuable prizes

Re: Frenzies Live On!!

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 12:58 am
by Ross
My guess is that by now Andrew has an idea of who has participated and/or expressed interest in the past - getting some e-mail addresees and sending an e-mail might help, rather than counting on people finding it on the forums at the right time.

Re: Frenzies Live On!!

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:35 am
by Eric Y.
Ah, but with the much-discussed 'subscribe' feature of the forums, an e-mail is already sent to anyone who wants one -- whenever a new event is posted in the forum.

Re: Frenzies Live On!!

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:53 am
by JonPorobil
Well, that "subscribe" feature only tells you when a Frenzy has been scheduled. If a frenzy has been scheduled for a time that I can't participate, then it's not likely to occur to me to check ummband.com for the songs when they go up... unless someone prods me to do so once they're there.

I think (and this holds true to Songfight as well) that listening/reviewing/voting is just going to be very low among non-participants. Still, we ought to be able to muster more than one vote.

Re: Frenzies Live On!!

Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 6:30 am
by supremeedible
Hey guys.

The skirmishes of yesteryear had a decent turnout by the looks of it. Maybe you can take a leaf out of that book re: timing and length of warning and means of information dissemination? I, of course, was not around then so I have no idea how they actually worked.

Re: Frenzies Live On!!

Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:18 pm
by JonPorobil
supremeedible wrote:Maybe you can take a leaf out of that book re: timing and length of warning and means of information dissemination? I, of course, was not around then so I have no idea how they actually worked.
Reist is doing it almost exactly the same, except that the Skirmishes didn't have their own message board, so all of the notification and voting was done here on the Songfight.net BB. I think that explains the higher voter turnout, but if you want to get more entrants, then I don't know.

Re: Frenzies Live On!!

Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:26 pm
by Reist
Generic wrote:
supremeedible wrote:Maybe you can take a leaf out of that book re: timing and length of warning and means of information dissemination? I, of course, was not around then so I have no idea how they actually worked.
Reist is doing it almost exactly the same, except that the Skirmishes didn't have their own message board, so all of the notification and voting was done here on the Songfight.net BB. I think that explains the higher voter turnout, but if you want to get more entrants, then I don't know.
I'm getting this feeling that having a separate forum for frenzies is a poor idea. However, I don't want the sidefight section to get flooded with annoying threads that are like 3 posts long. But yeah, moving frenzies to SF would be a decent idea, I think.

Re: Frenzies Live On!!

Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:47 pm
by Rabid Garfunkel
Petition the powers that be for a sub-topic (or whatever it's called) like the Nur Ein one up there at the top of the Sidefights section. Eh?

Re: Frenzies Live On!!

Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:51 pm
by irwin
Rabid Garfunkel wrote:Petition the powers that be for a sub-topic (or whatever it's called) like the Nur Ein one up there at the top of the Sidefights section. Eh?
This.

Re: Frenzies Live On!!

Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 6:17 am
by ujnhunter
irwin wrote:
Rabid Garfunkel wrote:Petition the powers that be for a sub-topic (or whatever it's called) like the Nur Ein one up there at the top of the Sidefights section. Eh?
This.
That.

Re: Frenzies Live On!!

Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 1:17 am
by Eric Y.
also: the other thing.

Re: Frenzies Live On!!

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:53 am
by jimtyrrell
et cetera.

Also: Frenzy!

Re: Frenzies Live On!!

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 12:05 pm
by irwin
Oh! One more thing...

</columbo>

Re: Frenzies Live On!!

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:09 pm
by ujnhunter
Reist, you have a SPAMbot on your site... LadyROOT

I keep getting PM's on my 125 Minute Frenzies account.

Re: Frenzies Live On!!

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:30 pm
by Ross
ME too.

Re: Frenzies Live On!!

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:39 pm
by jast
Perhaps the forum should just disappear... it hasn't been used for ages anyway.

Re: Frenzies Live On!!

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:38 pm
by Reist
jast wrote:Perhaps the forum should just disappear... it hasn't been used for ages anyway.
It's not really your problem.

I baleeted the spambot. Should frenzies recommence? On this board perhaps? If we run it here, then we can self-host our own songs. Then frenzies can happen a lot faster.

Re: Frenzies Live On!!

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:59 pm
by JonPorobil
Reïst wrote:
jast wrote:Perhaps the forum should just disappear... it hasn't been used for ages anyway.
It's not really your problem.

I baleeted the spambot. Should frenzies recommence? On this board perhaps? If we run it here, then we can self-host our own songs. Then frenzies can happen a lot faster.
I'm down with that.

Re: Frenzies Live On!!

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:14 pm
by Ross
I like frenzies given enough leadtime and notification!

Re: Frenzies Live On!!

Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:01 am
by jast
Reïst wrote:It's not really your problem.
Sure isn't. Unless the spam bots keep coming, of course. ;)